SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (7769)12/18/2003 2:00:29 AM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 10965
 
Of course Bush lied, but remember, Clinton lied about sex too and left office with 60% approvals. He would have won re-election despite the lies. In 2004 we need a candidate who stands tall. Above Bush. Bush has this macho leadershp thing going which is real. We need someone who can neutralize that without being leftwing about it.



To: stockman_scott who wrote (7769)12/18/2003 3:32:56 AM
From: ChinuSFO  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10965
 
Bush is not a liar. It is just that he doesn't know what is going on around him.

He sends Uncle Baker to Europe to negotiate Iraq's debt while at the same time telling France and Germany that they cannot bid on Iraqi contracts. Surely that is not a lie, is it. Isn't there a term for that? Incompetent. Or ineffective. Take your pick.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News