Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (6301)	12/18/2003 3:05:09 AM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 15987

The US has no business to unilaterally go into countries and impose their systems. This is not colonialism like the British did. Again I repeat, the US has no business in violating the sovereignity of other nations, going in there by force, arresting their men without due cause, etc. as they have done in Iraq. If they want to go after Saddam, get him and get out. If as a result there is civil war, so be it. There is civil war elsewhere such as in Rwanda, Sierra Leone etc. If the US does not intervene there, then it does not need to intervene in Iraq? Tell me why should it be different for Iraq.