SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Support the French! Viva Democracy! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (4134)12/18/2003 9:12:15 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7834
 
Child soldiers: Easy to train, willing to kill
By Sudha Ramachandran

BANGALORE - The recruitment of children and adolescents as combatants, while common among militant groups, is also practiced by some governments, since many children and young people are easily lured to a life of adventure, danger and patriotic duty and easily conditioned to follow orders.

The United Nations and its Convention on the Rights of the Child define children as those under 18 unless national lawa defines majority earlier. According to that definition, the United States, the United Kingdom and other nations routinely recruit volunteer children into the ranks of their armed forces and civil defense organizations.

The issue of child soldiers, however, tends center on armed insurgent groups in developing countries, though not exclusively so.

In South Asia, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) is perhaps the most notorious recruiter of children as combatants in the conflict in Sri Lanka. And this recruitment is said to be continuing, despite LTTE having pledged to halt the practice. In October alone, truce monitors received around 80 complaints, yet it was in October that the LTTE and the United Nations opened a joint rehabilitation center for former child soldiers.

For many years, the LTTE denied recruiting children. Later, it claimed that children were not sent to the battlefront and did not wield weapons. They were, the Tigers insisted, only put on guard duty, administrative and political work.

However, it is well-known that the Tigers deploy children in combat operations, even in suicide missions. This correspondent met several adolescent Tigers in the LTTE-controlled areas in the Jaffna peninsula in Sri Lanka’s Northern Province and the eastern district of Batticaloa. Both boys and girls were heavily armed.

In 1998, the LTTE promised the UN Secretary General's special representative for children and armed conflict, Olara Otunnu, that it would stop recruiting children. A ceasefire has been in place in Sri Lanka for almost two years, but the LTTE seems to have continued to recruit children throughout this period -- an act the government considers hostile. The LTTE routinely denies recruitment of children.

There are no figures to indicate how many children are in the Tiger ranks. Data on captured Tigers suggest that 40 percent of its fighting force consists of children between nine and 15. This high percentage could be the result of children getting captured more easily than adult fighters.

Children recruited in protracted conflicts
Although children are more susceptible to capture, militant groups all over the world are not averse to using them as fighters. This is especially so when the pool of adult males for recruitment starts dwindling, as often happens in areas where conflicts have been protracted.

Militant groups find children useful as spies and couriers as well as frontline fighters. "They are less likely to be suspected of being militants," a former fighter of the Hizbul Mujahideen, a militant group active in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir, told this correspondent.

Explaining the reasons for the growing number of child soldiers, Rory Mungoven, co-ordinator of the London-based Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers, told this correspondent, "The widespread availability of modern lightweight weapons and small arms means that even the smallest child can become an efficient killer in combat." Besides, children are often recruited because of "their very qualities as children - they can be cheap, expendable and easier to condition into fearless killing and unthinking obedience."

In Jammu and Kashmir, where Muslim insurgents seek independence from India, children were involved in militancy right from its inception in 1989-90. On instructions from adult militants, children would throw grenades at the Indian security forces. Over the years, the number of children joining the militant ranks has increased. According to police sources, about a hundred boys below the age of 18 crossed into Pakistan for training last year. That number is said to have quadrupled since January this year.

In the early years of the militancy in Kashmir, adolescent boys joined up voluntarily, attracted by the romance of risk and adventure that life as a militant promised. Today, most of the boys in militant groups here are said to have been kidnapped or coerced into picking up arms. Poverty too pushes many into the career option of militancy where life may be more materially rewarding.

According to an Indian intelligence source in Srinagar, schools, playgrounds and mosques are favorite hunting grounds. It was in a mosque that 17-year-old Afaq Ahmed Shah, the first suicide bomber in Kashmir, was recruited for his deadly mission. Afaq was depressed as he had failed his school examinations twice. He started spending a lot of time in the local mosque. Unbeknownst to his parents, jihadis were indoctrinating Afaq, convincing him to do something meaningful with his life - like carry out a suicide mission. On April 19, 2000, the teenager drove a car filled with explosives into the gates of the heavily guarded Indian Army headquarters in Srinagar.

Orphans especially susceptible
Orphanages and schools have been important recruiting and training grounds for the Tigers. Amnesty International cites the case of a mother who had left her child to be brought up in an LTTE-sponsored orphanage. Three years later, she received the remains of the 13-year old in a sealed coffin.

Children, especially adolescents, are easily indoctrinated and are more willing than adults to carry out risky missions. The thrill of wielding weapons and the power that flows from being armed draws many into the militant groups. Orphans are easily recruited because militant groups provide them with food and a sense of belonging, a family.

It was in the madrassas (religious schools) in Pakistan that the Taliban was born. While not all madrassas are nurseries that produce terrorists, it is from these schools that boys continue to be recruited into terror organizations like the Lashkar-e-Toiba, the Jaish-e-Mohammed and others. Poverty forces many parents to send their sons to madrassas for schooling. The boys end up being sent across the border into India and Afghanistan. There are reports that senior jihadis sometimes sexually abuse the young recruits.

Leftist insurgents in South Asia too are recruiting children. These groups claim to be fighting economic and social exploitation, and are theoretically opposed to child labor, as it is the result of poverty. Yet, they do not hesitate to exploit children themselves. According to the Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers, as many as 30 percent of Nepal’s Maoist fighters are below 18.

Indian leftist insurgent groups also use children. The Peoples War Group (PWG), which is active in the states of Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Orissa, as well as the Maoist Community Center (MCC), which is active in Bihar and Jharkhand, have several children working for them as couriers, cooks and spies, sometimes even as combatants. At one time, the PWG had as many as 800 children in its ranks.

Guns empower poor children
For children from the socially or economically disadvantaged sections of society, carrying guns and being able to use them is hugely empowering. They and their families have suffered because of the caste system or at the hands of landlords. They are impressed by the way gun-toting boys and girls from socio-economic backgrounds similar to their own, can command and punish the local landlords. They see life in the insurgent groups as an escape from poverty and a path to empowerment.

Governments publicize the recruitment of children by militant groups in an effort to discredit them. However, governments worldwide also recruit "as volunteers" under-age boys and girls into the armed forces, civilian defense forces and other groups.

In Sri Lanka, for instance, other Tamil militant groups and paramilitaries assisting the armed forces in fighting the LTTE have children, some as young as 13 years of age, among their ranks. These young fighters belonging to groups like the Peoples Liberation Organization of Tamil Eelam and the Eelam Peoples Revolutionary Liberation Front (Raseeq Group) are paid by the Sri Lankan government. A teenage fighter this correspondent met in a camp near Batticaloa town admitted he had participated in combat operations but quickly added that he hadn’t killed anyone yet.

Both India and Pakistan recruit volunteers at 16 but claim they do not deploy them in military operations before they turn 18. But recruiting child soldiers is not exclusive to developing countries. "The UK and the US are in the company of Myanmar, Sudan and Afghanistan when it comes to deploying under-18s into combat," observed Mungoven.

"The UK recruits even 16-year-olds and routinely sends 17-year-olds into combat. The US has deployed under-age troops in the Gulf War, in Somalia and in the Balkans." A survey of the Organization for Security Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in 2000 found that more than half of all OSCE member states accept under-18s into their forces.

For many youngsters who opt for life as combatants because of idealism, patriotism or the excitement that comes with living on the edge, the romance fades soon enough. It is near impossible to opt out of a militia, as seniors will not let them quit and the security forces treat them like they would an adult militant. With exit routes blocked, their dreams simply die young.



To: epicure who wrote (4134)12/18/2003 11:51:41 AM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 7834
 
After a quick scan, one (major) issue missing is calling in some UN officials, the one who planted some (non-factual) documents in the UNSCOM pile of confidential documents, just to test how fast and where they would be leaked, proving that somebody had planted spies in UNSCOM.

But there will surely be a lot of issues on permissable and non-permissable questions, closed door stuff, and at worst .. some hand-picked guys quickly both re-instating the deathpenalty and making a decision (and another martyr has been born)

And then there is the question of the style of execution?? Will that too be a transparent internet-happening, like in Florida?? (additionally considering the difference between cultures where death is happening in the family, with the family, with or without war, or is handled by professionals)

<Pepe is always worth reading:>

agree, difficult to find media which can publish facts these days, asia is maybe best, until somebody sets up a server on the south pole.

Ilmarinen

PS Interesting legal dilemma, illegal occupying force and legal courts, and then the other victims, Iranians and Kuwaitis,etc.. (but actually no americans, they are just needed to testify)



To: epicure who wrote (4134)12/19/2003 9:47:55 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7834
 
THE ROVING EYE
THE RAT TRAP
Part 2: Why the resistance will increase
By Pepe Escobar

Part 1: How Saddam may still nail Bush

BAKU - Former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) asset Saddam Hussein is - already was - totally beside the point. Only in the past few months have we learned the extent to which the Saddam system sub-contracted a great deal of decision-making to different Iraqi elite - from tribal sheikhs to businessmen and Sunni and Wahhabi religious leaders. They may originally have been cajoled by Saddam with carrots and sticks to be incorporated into the Ba'athist regime. But now they are totally free to command their own agendas.

To top it all, they really have a common agenda for the first time in their lives: a war against American occupation. The resistance will persist because Saddam was never its political, religious, spiritual or moral guide. The mukawama - resistance against foreign occupation - is now a full-blown nationalist, religious movement. The most popular political party on the sprawling campus of Baghdad University is not the widely-despised Ahmad Chalabi's neo-conservative-backed Iraqi National Congress. It is the Iraq Islamist Party.

A recent peaceful mass demonstration in the south-central city of Hilla brought down the local "collaborator" governor. People were shouting: "Free elections now!" Sources in Baghdad tell Asia Times Online that avalanches of people are just waiting for June 2004 to see what kind of government the Americans will allow, and if they are not satisfied, then they will join the resistance. But there are also many people - Sunni and Shi'ite - who fear that some Iraqi Governing Council (IGC) members may turn violent, afraid of losing power. Rival Kurdish chieftains Jalal Talabani and Masoud Barzani - both on the IGC - keep their strong peshmerga private armies. Chalabi has his own CIA-trained army, complete with American weapons. According to new Iraqi policemen who defected to Amman, Jordan, the bulk of the new Iraqi police is also inclined to join the resistance.

The increasingly sophisticated attacks in the Sunni triangle are being coordinated by the Committee of the Faith. They are Sunni, and most of all, they are Wahhabi - and they had the freedom to proselytize and act even under Saddam. As the relentless mukawama will expose day by day the fallacy of the Anglo-American mantra - according to which the attacks are perpetrated by "remnants of Saddam's regime" - expect from Washington another change in the screenplay: the blame will shift to "foreign" al-Qaeda or "Syrian-backed terrorists".

The Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) is making things even worse. According to Iraqi-Canadian journalist Firas al-Atraqchi, the CPA wants Kurdish peshmergas patrolling the explosive Sunni triangle and Mosul - which is predominantly Arab: "Sunni religious leaders have expressed outrage over the proposed deal and have warned, in no ambiguous terms, that the Sunni areas will not tolerate being patrolled or policed by Kurdish (or Shi'ite) militia. They warn that a civil war would be inevitable."

The non-aligned mujahideen
Meanwhile, in Europe, anti-terrorist specialists warn that the four bombings in Istanbul last month were also messages to the European Union - because some countries, like Britain, Italy and Spain, are collaborating with the Americans in Iraq, and also because they have dismantled jihadi cells in Europe. Experts at the European Strategic Intelligence and Security Center (ESISC) in Brussels are extremely worried of a fallout from Iraq and an imminent attack on one of the European Union countries.

European investigations are centered on Sheikh Abderrazak, an Algerian who was based in Milan and who is now under arrest in Hamburg, and who was a member of al-Tawhid, an organization directed by Abu Mussab al-Zarkawi, a Jordanian and an al-Qaeda planner who was identified before the Iraq war by US Secretary of State Colin Powell as the "missing link" between Saddam and Osama bin Laden. Nobody in Europe at the time - apart from Britain's Tony Blair, Italy's Silvio Berlusconi and Jose Aznar of Spain - was convinced of the link. Now, however, European investigators tell Asia Times Online that things have changed and Zarkawi "is indeed part of the Iraqi resistance. The Americans invaded Iraq as part of their 'war on terror', and ended up bringing terror to Iraq."

Zarkawi - loaded with German contacts - is suspected of recruiting "more than a thousand jihadis to Iraq": they are Arab-Afghans, jihad veterans, with European passports. August Hanning, president of the German security service (BND), told German television that most of these jihadis, and some extra volunteers, have already left to Iraq from Great Britain, Bosnia and Germany, infiltrating via Syria and Saudi Arabia. Hanning is convinced that Iraq is about to become "the crystallization point for extremist Islamists the world over".

Experts in Brussels have even a "top ten" list of countries most likely to be victims of a next wave of terror attacks: they are, from top to bottom, the US, Britain, Israel, Australia, France, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Germany and Poland. The experts are all assuming the working hypothesis that al-Qaeda cells which are not directly related to bin Laden anymore are using an "al-Qaeda trademark" to mobilize jihadis and increase the repercussion of their particular attacks.

The ESISC has thus detected the last word in the "war on terror": the emergence of the "non-aligned mujahideen". These people are skilled, totally isolated and practically undetectable. Alain Chouet, in a study from the French Institute of International Relations, stresses that since December 2001, only five attacks can be attributed with full certainty to al-Qaeda. Chouet stresses that al-Qaeda has definitely mutated into "a multitude of small entrepreneurs or local sub-contractors, with tortuous and indirect strategies".

Breakdown: The Iraqi resistance
The invasion of Iraq was widely perceived as an attack on the Arab world. That's why the resistance is turning pan-Arab. Once again: this is a nationalist and religious resistance movement.

Asia Times Online has ascertained that at least 12 independent guerrilla organizations from different tribes are involved in the mukawama, all vaguely in touch with each other. This loose organization may be about to extend its reach nationwide. But the Iraqi guerrilla movement is extraordinarily complex. These in essence are the main actors:

The former army. The majority of the 400,000 Iraqi soldiers demobilized by US proconsul L Paul Bremer were nothing but victims of the Ba'athist regime. Humiliated and frustrated, they inevitably turned to the resistance - and they were not being financed by Saddam Hussein, as Asia Times Online reported from the Sunni triangle. At least 100,000 soldiers from the Republican Guard and Special Republican Guard didn't even receive a meager financial compensation from the Americans. Big mistake: they were the best trained, the best equipped, the best motivated, and now they are totally engaged in the resistance. They are nationalists demonstrating in practice how the whole thing is not about Saddam's return to power, but about getting rid of a foreign invader.

The tribes. An extremely complex tribal game is in play in Iraq. Saddam was a master in this business. An example: Ramadi and Fallujah, in the Sunni triangle, home to some of the most vicious anti-American attacks, are controlled by the huge Doulaiymi tribe - which always had a turbulent relationship with Saddam. The reason for the attacks were not $100 bills showered around by Saddam's henchmen, but repeated blunders and massacres of civilians by the 82nd Airborne Division. The Americans themselves fed the infernal cycle of violence with their string of arbitrary arrests and daily humiliations. Tha'ar (revenge) is the absolute norm for these extremely proud Bedouins. Meanwhile, local tribes around Kirkuk are attacking oil pipelines just as a means of finally getting paid for protecting them. The Americans then dissolved the so-called "oil police" and sub-contracted regional security to a South African private firm, which for its part sub-contracted security to - who else - the local tribes.

Remnants of Saddam's regime. They are reduced to nothing more than the fedayeen of Saddam - the private militia established by his late son Uday - the surveillance apparatchik and the tribes in Tikrit. It's fair to expect much accumulated rage to explode in the form of attacks now that Saddam is in captivity. These people are armed to the teeth - with weapons caches dispersed all over the country. It still remains to be discovered how they connect with and how they provide logistical assistance to the professional jihadis that Hanning says are coming from Syria and Saudi Arabia.

The jihadis. An elite among them comprise the instigators and perpetrators of the suicide bombings. There are a few dozen survivors of Ansar al-Islam who crossed to Iranian Kurdistan, fleeing American bombing last March: they don't make much of a difference. Most of all there may be a few thousand jihadis who came before, during and after the war. They are Yemenite, Lebanese, Sudanese, Syrian, Egyptian, Jordanian - the pan-Arab character of the resistance. They are loosely linked with local, small groups of salafis - an extremist interpretation of Sunni Islam.

American blunders only inflame the resistance. Samarra was a classic case. The Americans said that the guerrillas were Saddam fedayeen. Asia Times Online has been to Samarra: it's a very religious, conservative city which never bowed to Saddam. Sources say that the bulk of the local resistance was from a group called the Mujahideen of Mohammed. Residents insist that there are no fedayeen in the city and accuse the Americans of being the terrorists, massacring civilians.

A new resistance tactic is to join the Iraqi police - recruited and paid for by the Americans - earn some $50 a month, train with American-provided weapons and gather valuable intelligence on the foreign invader. Meanwhile, the American military are now performing an exact replay of the Israeli military occupying Palestine: they surround large tracts with barbed wire and ultra-intimidating security checks, bulldoze houses and round up all men for lengthy interrogations. Tha'ar will come.

The American tactic of now Iraqifying the war is nothing but a replay of "Vietnamization". Washington's push to make over a complex society in its own image will fail - as it failed in Vietnam. Iraqis, politically very sophisticated despite decades of dictatorship, detect crystal-clear the American plan, imposed at tank point, to privatize the whole country by selling its assets and fabulous natural resources to American - and a few European - corporations. This, most of all, is what is fueling the resistance. They know they cannot let people like Chalabi or Talabani in the IGC decide the future of the nation.

As author and commentator Tariq Ali has forcefully pointed out on the website Counterpunch, this is the "21st-century colonial model: Specialist companies are now encouraged to provide 'security'. They employ the mercenaries, and their profits are ensured by the state that hires them. They are backed up by the real army and, more importantly, by air power, to help defeat the enemy. But none of this will work if the population remains hostile. And large-scale repression only helps to unite the population against the occupiers. The fear in Washington is that the Iraqi resistance might attempt a sensational hit just before the next presidential election. The fear in the Arab east is that [President George W] Bush and [Vice President Dick] Cheney might escalate the conflict to retain the White House in 2004. Both fears may well be justified."

While Saddam awaits his trial, this is what the headlines will be about: a massive popular resistance movement fighting 21st-century colonization, while the new actors of jihad bet on a context of endless war. Saddam may be history, but it will be interesting to hear what he has to say. It ain't over till this desert "rat" sings.

(Copyright 2003 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)