SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : HOWARD DEAN -THE NEXT PRESIDENT? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)12/19/2003 11:48:54 AM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3079
 
The New Electable Howard Dean
by Kareem Fahim
December 17 - 23, 2003

villagevoice.com

Howard Dean waxed magnanimous Sunday, reacting to the
broadly welcomed announcement of Saddam Hussein's arrest.
Progress in Iraq could be terrible news for a Democrat
running actively on the premise that the war there was wrong.
"This is . . . a great day for America," Dean said, adding that President
George W. Bush deserved a "day of celebration." Hussein's arrest, he said,
underscored the need to more quickly return sovereignty of Iraq to its people.
His Democratic opponents were not so generous, at least not to him.

Joseph Lieberman moved to inject some life into his wilting campaign with
a little domestic bellicosity, saying, "If Howard Dean had his way,
Saddam Hussein would still be in power today, not in prison."
The Connecticut senator, his hawkish confidence now restored,
also called for Hussein to stand trial in the United States,
so that he might face the death penalty. John Kerry joined Lieberman
in suggesting that their support for the war was now vindicated.

There were no signs, at press time, that much had changed in Iraq.
In the last two days car bombs killed 27 Iraqis. An American
soldier was killed Sunday while defusing a roadside bomb.
And the Lieberman and Kerry attacks suggest that
despite the dramatic capture of Hussein, the Democrats in this
primary season are still dealing with the other news-the emergence
of Dean as clear front-runner.


In the past few weeks, Dean has built a commanding lead over his rivals,
buoyed most forcefully by the endorsement from Al Gore. Gore's support carried
with it the imprimatur of the Democratic respectability that Dean badly needed.
Polls showed that after that announcement, Dean became the favorite
of Democratic voters nationwide, and importantly, the leader among those
in Iowa and New Hampshire.


This month, Dean's campaign has moved past the single issue that his critics said made him unelectable-his anti-war rhetoric. While his innovative and successful fundraising strategy and his healthy poll numbers have been tracked for some time, his policy proposals have been somehow obscured by the very passion that first attracted the crowds.

Officially, his campaign maintains it was never concerned that Dean was becoming too closely identified with his opposition to the invasion of Iraq. The war, said Jay Carson, a Dean spokesperson,"is just a metaphor for standing up for what you believe in." But any misunder-standing was largely Dean's fault. On a number of fronts-including foreign policy and the economy, the two areas that Dean has suggested are vital to a successful candidacy-the campaign had yet to offer a vision, save some very broad strokes. So in December, Dean looked to define himself, delivering major policy speeches on race, national security, and education. Later this week, he plans to talk about the economy.
Prior to Hussein's capture, and indeed before Gore's endorsement, Dean realized that to navigate the waters of 2004, he was going to need a bigger boat.

Dean's speech Monday in Los Angeles was his first serious foreign policy foray since September, when he wrote an editorial on national security in The Arizona Republic. "The capture of Saddam is a good thing, which I hope very much will keep our soldiers safer," he told the audience in L.A. "But the capture of Saddam has not made America safer."

Stressing that his position on the war had not changed, Dean moved
on to the matter that he surely hopes will move voters come election time:
national security, and the threats still posed by weapons
of mass destruction.


The former governor also devoted time to what one of his advisers called
"a foreign policy that brings hope and opportunity to people around the world,"
and included his global initiative on HIV/AIDS, and debt relief for poor nations.

Taken together, it was a radical revision of Bush Abroad, carefully structured
to include all the relevant vocabulary. Dean knows that WMDs and terrorism
are threats that scare Americans;
instead of ignoring this, he sought to prove that he could be tough, too.
"I will call on the most powerful armed forces
the world has ever known to ensure the security of this nation," he said.

He rolled out his "kitchen cabinet," a mix of Clinton-era diplomats,
former generals, and other think tank types, including the Brookings Institution's Ivo Daalder. The names will hearten moderates, and assuage the Democratic leadership, worried that the presumptive nominee was a bit on the crunchy side.

In an interview on Saturday with The Washington Post, Dean offered other details,
promising shifts of U.S. policy towards North Korea, Palestine, and Iraq. He
advocated bilateral talks with the regime of Kim Jong Il, and embraced the
Geneva Accord as a basis for peace between Israelis and Palestinians.
He also called for immediate elections in Iraq to replace the U.S.-appointed
Iraqi Governing Council there.


His thoughts on Iraq were most anticipated, and not just because of recent events. Candidates like Clark and Kerry have flaunted their experience, both as soldiers and participants in a number of international conflicts. Dean has no real foreign policy experience, and has displayed a lack of depth when answering questions about post-war Iraq.
It's not clear if his policies will go far enough to satisfy some of Dean's early supporters, and progressives that have rallied to his side. Many will note that the more controversial proposals did not make it to the body of his speech.
Franklin Kramer, a former official in the Clinton administration and one of Dean's advisers, called the candidate a "centrist."

"He is not in any way opposed to the use of force," he said. "And he believes
in the approach that has worked for the U.S. for many years," a mix of military
pressure, diplomacy, "and activities that go beyond that-generating coalitions and partnerships."


A week before Sunday's news from Iraq, Dean tackled America's racial politics,
trying to go beyond the conventional appeal to just say no to Bush.
He traveled to Reverend Joiquim Barnes's small church in Columbia, South Carolina, where he was joined on the dais by another big draw-Congressman Jesse Jackson Jr. At ease and popular in this setting, Jackson would speak first and introduce Dean, who is still finding his way in front of black audiences.
Oddly, the church wasn't nearly full.

The day before, Dean had thrown out "the red meat"-the nickname for his stump speech-to the party faithful at the Florida Democratic Convention, a hyped-up, placard-waving throng in the ballroom at a Disney World hotel. When he was done, he strolled out of the giant hall, sucking out all the life he had stirred, and a lot of the people too. Poor Dennis Kucinich was left appealing for courage and change to a half-full room.

But the ground under this church at the intersection of Ridgewood and Wildsmere
in Columbia was less familiar, and possibly more important.
Dean has to prove to his doubters that he can compete for votes,
both black and white, in the South. His campaign hopes that after his stops here,
the excitement will follow him, eventually leaving competitors like Dick Gephardt,
Wesley Clark, and John Edwards nothing but half-full rooms. For the moment, though, polls show that Dean still trails all of those men in conservative South Carolina. And while black voters are strongly anti-war, and a majority of them oppose Bush, they are far from decided that Dean represents the best alternative.

Congressman Jackson
took the stage, filling the church hollows with a highly charged sermon. Reminding parishioners of his family's deep roots in South Carolina, he recounted the biblical tale of General Naaman, the Syrian leper who, despite his record of great military service, could not shake the stigma of his disease.
"Christ did not die on this altar between these two candles," he continued, his arms outstretched and his hands now quivering.

"He died on Calvary between two thieves. Between-two pimps, if you will. Between two pushers."
This was allegory. The sick in America deserve health care, Jackson reasoned. "Between-two health care thieves," he exclaimed. Millions of children expected higher-quality education, the congressman thundered. "Between-two education thieves!"

Murmurs of broad agreement floated up from the congregation, hit the low roof of the church, and journeyed toward Jackson, who by now was running very hot. "The Christ that we serve, died engaged in the process for change," he said. The congregation now had Jesus on its side, a reason to shout.
"You've gotta believe that we can beat George Bush."


Howard Dean weighed the speech, smiled, and surely wondered how on earth he would top it.
At least Jackson had played to Dean's strengths, citing issues he hopes will define
his campaign: health care, jobs, and education. Taking his turn at the pulpit, he spoke
slowly and softly. "I have to follow Reverend Barnes," he said, smiling. "I have to follow
Congressman Jackson. I have to follow the choir?" He looked around, soaking up
a bit of sympathetic laughter.
"I am grateful to be here," he began.

Two days later, Dean was indisputably the man to beat.
This was a collision of happy accidents, the fruits of a shrewd campaign,
or maybe parts of both. But on December 9, two days after the trip to South Carolina,
Al Gore endorsed Dean, ending, in the minds of many pundits, the Democratic nomination race.
There was wide speculation on why it had happened and what it meant. To some,
the endorsement heralded the start of a new, powerful faction of the Democratic Party.
A ragtag guerrilla movement mobilized on the Internet, united in opposition to the war in Iraq,
and made powerful by liberal groups like MoveOn.org, Meetup.com, and the myriad
activist groups thriving under the Dean campaign umbrella.

Much hay was also made of Gore's personal motivations. Perhaps this was a parry
of the Clintons' support for General Clark. Or simply recognition that whatever the
Democratic Party stood for when Gore ruled the roost, it needed an overhaul,
and Dean was the man to do it.

Gore, speaking in Harlem, called Howard Dean the only candidate "who has
been able to inspire [voters] at the grassroots level."
The former vice president
all but called on the rest of the Democratic hopefuls to drop out of the race.
"Democracy is a team sport," he warned. "We can't afford to be divided amongst ourselves."
On the strength of the endorsement, Dean was able to raise almost $700,000.
"Eight months ago, Howard Dean was no one with nothing from nowhere," said Phil Noble, head of South Carolina's Democratic Leadership Council. "Now it's over, except for the countin' and the shoutin'."
To viewers just tuning in to the Dean show, Gore's surprising stamp of approval was a windfall. But to some who had been watching, the doctor's horse was simply winning, and Gore wanted part of it.

That day in South Carolina, Dean delivered a serious speech on race,
not at Joiquim's church but before a mostly white crowd in a hotel conference room.
He charged that Republicans since the Nixon administration had been running
their Southern campaigns based on "guns, God, and gays." He reminded the group
that phrases like "racial quotas" and "welfare queens" were code, signals to white
America that "minorities were to blame for all of America's problems."
Dean's speech emphasized a commonality of concerns, irrespective of race.
"There is nothing black or white about having to live from one paycheck to another,"
he told the crowd. "Jobs, health care, education, democracy, and opportunity.
These are the issues that can unite America."
Dean has spoken on these issues before, but never in as much detail.
And he did it in the South, with Jesse Jackson Jr. at his side.


"He came and delivered a message," said Phil Noble, who watched the speech. "That's unusual for a politician, and vital in South Carolina." Noble also noticed how white the room was, and he blamed the Internet. While online organizing has been Dean's great strength, many blacks don't have access to computers, fueling the charge that the campaign is indifferent to black voters.

"If you sat down and designed a candidate to be maximally attractive to Southern voters,
it wouldn't be Howard Dean," said Noble. "But that doesn't mean we won't accept him.
He talks a little funny, but our ears will get attuned." Southerners,
Noble pointed out, are "disproportionately without health care, insecure about jobs,
and grossly disproportionately concerned with poor education in schools."
"Besides," said Noble, "Southerners like feisty people. And Dean is a Yankee redneck."

At the end of Dean's remarks, he and Jackson performed a kind of duet.
After Jackson called up voters who might not be registered-because they had changed their names or were about to turn 18-Dean shook their hands. Jackson, like his father, prides himself on his voter registration work.
The congressman was effusive after the speech, telling reporters how impressed he was with the outreach message and pledging to work "this entire state on behalf of Governor Dean." But when questioned about Dean's contention that there are only "human concerns"-and not, perhaps, issues that just affect blacks-Jackson seemed to hesitate.

"I think he understands this issue enough, and he will grow beyond this point," he said.
By week's end, Representatives Jesse Jackson Jr., Robert Scott, and Elijah Cummings
had all endorsed Dean. The Black Commentator, a widely read progressive online journal,
called his speech "the most important statement on race in American politics by
a mainstream white politician in nearly 40 years."


Last month, a reporter spotted a printout tacked to a wall in Dean's New York campaign headquarters. It was a posting from the Note, ABC News' website on politics. Entries on a long list of observations about the Dean campaign included: "What doesn't kill Howard Dean only makes him stronger";
and "Howard Dean Doesn't Have Cable TV."
Observation #16 was more serious, if not a little wordy.
"Dean can theoretically win a general election race against President Bush,
but not without growing significantly as a candidate and a person, including
and especially in rhetorical and symbolic relationship to faith, family, freedom, and national security."
Eric Schmeltzer, the campaign's New York press secretary, admitted he hadn't even noticed the entry.
The list was on the wall, he said, because of observation #18, which claimed that Dean
staffers have more fun than those who work for other campaigns.

But #16 seems to have been internalized, and in December-despite the
Dean campaign's attempts to deny the change-a transformation
seemed to be under way. So Dean stood at the pulpit that
Sunday in South Carolina, anxious to make new friends.
He had listened to Jackson, his host in the South,
and had perhaps considered articulating a little faith, freedom, and values.
"I'm reminded that Jesus saw the woman at the well," he said.
"I'm reminded that Jesus threw the money changers out of the temple.
I'm reminded that Jesus rebuked the Pharisees for they had everything
and gave nothing to those who were in need." This was more Jesus than
anyone could remember from the former governor. All the allegory needed
was a little direction.

"We need jobs in this country," said Dr. Dean. Then he threw out the red meat.



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)12/26/2003 8:14:37 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 3079
 
New Year's Resolutions
The New York Times

December 26, 2003

By PAUL KRUGMAN

During the 2000 election, many journalists deluded themselves and
their audience into believing that there weren't many policy differences
between the major candidates, and focused on personalities
(or, rather, perceptions of personalities) instead. This time there can be no
illusions: President Bush has turned this country sharply to the right,
and this election will determine whether the right's takeover is complete.


But will the coverage of the election reflect its seriousness? Toward that end,
I hereby propose some rules for 2004 political reporting.

o Don't talk about clothes.
Al Gore's endorsement of Howard Dean
was a momentous event: the man who won the popular vote in 2000 threw his
support to a candidate who accuses the president of wrongfully taking the nation to war.
So what did some prominent commentators write about?
Why, the fact that both men wore blue suits.


This was not, alas, unusual. I don't know why some journalists seem
so concerned about politicians' clothes as opposed to, say, their policy
proposals. But unless you're a fashion reporter, obsessing about clothes
is an insult to your readers' intelligence.

o Actually look at the candidates' policy proposals.
One key proposal
in the State of the Union address will, we hear, be the creation of new types of
tax-exempt savings accounts. The proposal will come wrapped in fine phrases
about an "ownership society." But serious journalists should tell us
how the plan would work, who would benefit and who would lose.


An early version of the plan was floated almost a year ago, and carefully
analyzed in the journal Tax Notes. So there's no excuse for failing to report
that the plan would probably reduce, not increase, national savings;
that it would have large long-run budget costs; and that its benefits would go
mainly to the wealthiest few percent of the population.

o Beware of personal anecdotes.
Anecdotes that supposedly reveal
a candidate's character are a staple of political reporting, but they should carry
warning labels.

For one thing, there are lots of anecdotes, and it's much too easy to report
only those that reinforce the reporter's prejudices. The approved story
line about Mr. Bush is that he's a bluff, honest, plain-spoken guy,
and anecdotes that fit that story get reported. But if the
conventional wisdom were instead that he's a phony,
a silver-spoon baby who pretends to be a cowboy,
journalists would have plenty of material to work with.


If a reporter must use anecdotes, they'd better be true.
After the Dean endorsement, innumerable reporters cracked jokes
about Al Gore's inventing the Internet. Guys, he never said that:
it's a malicious distortion of a true statement,
and no self-respecting journalist would repeat it.

o Look at the candidates' records.
A close look at Mr. Bush's record
as governor would have revealed that, the approved story line notwithstanding,
he was no moderate. A close look at Mr. Dean's record in Vermont reveals
that, the emerging story line notwithstanding, he is no radical: he was a
fiscally conservative leader whose biggest policy achievement - nearly
universal health insurance for children - was the result of incremental
steps.


o Don't fall for political histrionics.
I couldn't believe
how much ink was spilled after the Gore-Dean event
over Joe Lieberman's hurt feelings. Folks,
we're talking about war, peace and the future
of U.S. democracy - not about who takes whom to the prom.

Political operatives have become experts at manufacturing
the appearance of outrage. In the last few weeks the usual
suspects have been trying to paint Howard Dean's obviously
heartfelt comments about his brother's death in Laos as
some sort of insult to the military. We owe it to our readers
not to fall for these tricks.


o It's not about you.
We learn from
The Washington Post that reporters covering
Mr. Dean are surprised - and,
it's implied, miffed - that "he never
asks a single question about them." The mind reels.

I don't really expect my journalistic colleagues to follow these rules.
No doubt I myself, in moments of weakness, will break one or more of them.
But history will not forgive us if we allow laziness and personal pettiness
to shape this crucial election.

Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company
nytimes.com



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)12/30/2003 12:46:18 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 3079
 
CHALLENGING BUSH

From Patrician Roots, Dean Set Path of Prickly Independence
The New York Times
December 28, 2003
Message 19637735



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)12/30/2003 12:49:32 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 3079
 
Dean Wants to Put $100B to Create Jobs
Message 19637719



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)12/30/2003 1:11:25 PM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3079
 

Rules of supply/demand prove dangerous with flu


" More disturbing still is the apparent lack of coordination at the federal level to
quickly address the flu vaccine shortage. Neither the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration nor the Department of Health and
Human Services has yet mounted an adequate response.

Because flu vaccines are not nearly as profitable as some other drugs, the
pharmaceutical industry has little incentive to produce more than it expects to sell.
This year, the industry didn't make enough. The shameful truth is that shady
operators have been allowed to fill that gap by peddling lifesaving drugs to the
highest bidder."


ajc.com

Message 19639244



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)12/30/2003 1:46:53 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 3079
 

Democrats will fight back in 2004


sfgate.com

E.J. Dionne Jr., Washington Post Writers Group

Tuesday, December 30, 2003

Middletown, R.I. -- EVERY ACTION, said the
political pundit Sir Isaac Newton, produces an equal
and opposite reaction.

The year 2003 will be remembered as the time when
Democrats decided to fight back against George W.
Bush after coddling and even embracing him in 2002.
This whiplash will mean some surprising things for
2004.


It's hard to think of any other president who has gone
so quickly from being so unifying to so divisive. There
was hardly a soul this side of Noam Chomsky who
didn't support Bush for some time after the attacks of
9/11 and didn't support the war on the Taliban in
Afghanistan. Even Democrats who never conceded
that Bush had legitimately won the 2000 election
wanted to give Bush a chance to lead the country out
of crisis.

So what went wrong?
Unrequited bipartisanship.
Implicitly, the Democrats expected that the new
situation would produce a new Bush, less partisan
and less ideological. For a few months after the
attacks, that was the Bush who showed up to work
every day. He and the Democrats did a lot of
business together, and the country seemed happy.

It could not last because Bush didn't want to be
Dwight D. Eisenhower, a nonpartisan leader who
unified the country without being much help to his
party. Ticket splitting began in a big way during the
1950s when millions of Democrats went for Ike but
stuck with their party on the rest of the ballot. Bush
wanted to realign the country and create a
Republican majority for bold conservative policies at
home and abroad.

And so, even as he was shoveling money out the
door for national defense and new engagements
abroad, Bush went for more tax cuts for the wealthy.
He moved from Afghanistan to Iraq and ridiculed
Democrats who held off on full endorsement of the
war against Saddam pending strong United Nations
support. In September of 2002, shortly before the
midterm elections, Bush mocked such Democrats as
saying, according to Bush: "Oh, by the way, on a
matter of national security, I'm going to wait for
somebody else to act."

And just before the elections, Bush went after
Democrats for their stand on the homeland security
bill, turning the very ground on which bipartisanship
had been built into an electoral battlefield.

Republicans won in 2002, but Bush lost most
Democrats forever. Conservative critics of "Bush
hatred" like to argue that opposition to the president
is a weird psychological affliction. It is nothing of the
sort. It is a rational response to getting burned. They
are, as a friend once put it, biting the hand that had
slapped them in the face.

No one understood this sense of betrayal better or
earlier than Howard Dean. Dean's candidacy took off
because many in the Democratic rank and file were
furious that Washington Democrats allowed
themselves to be taken to the cleaners. Many of
Dean's current loyalists had been just as supportive
of Bush after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks
because they, too, felt that doing so was patriotic.
So Dean also spoke to their personal sense of
aggrievement.


Here's what's interesting for 2004: The conventional
wisdom, fed by shrewd Republican operatives and
commentators, is that Democrats, so out there in
their antipathy for Bush, will push their party into an
extremist wonderland and lose white men, security
moms and anybody else who does not share their
desire for revenge.

The opposite is true. Democrats will not have to
spend inordinate time or money in this election year
"uniting their base." Opposition to Bush has already
done that.

In the 2000 election, Bush had an advantage over Al
Gore because Republican rank-and-filers so hated
Bill Clinton -- and so wanted to win -- that they gave
Bush ample room to sound as moderate as John
Breaux or Olympia Snowe. Bush's 2000 Republican
National Convention hid the base behind the
appealing face of inclusiveness and outreach. Gore,
in the meantime, had to claw back the votes of
liberals and lefties who had strayed to Ralph Nader.

This time, the Democrats will have most of the
election year to appeal to swing voters. Democrats
are so hungry to beat Bush that they will let their
nominee do just about anything, even be pragmatic
and shrewd.

That's why 2004 will be very different from 2003.
Democrats who loved Dean's attacks on Bush this
year now want Dean to prove he can beat him.
Dean's opponents know this, which is why their core
case is that Dean can't win. And watch for the
appearance of the new, pragmatic Howard Dean, the
doctor with an unerring sense of his party's pulse.



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)12/30/2003 5:27:21 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 3079
 

Dean Labels Bush 'Reckless'
Candidate Launches Broad Criticisms Tied to U.S. Security


By Ceci Connolly
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, December 30, 2003; Page A04

DETROIT, Dec. 29 -- From Iraq to homeland security to public
health, President Bush's "reckless" habit of placing "ideology over
facts" has resulted in "the most dangerous administration in my
lifetime," Democrat Howard Dean charged over the past two days.

In Midwest campaign stops
and an interview, the
former Vermont governor
said developments both
abroad and at home give
credence to his assertion
two weeks ago that the
United States is "no safer"
with the capture of former
Iraqi leader Saddam
Hussein.

"If we are safer, how come
we lost 10 more troops and
raised the safety alert" to
the orange level, Dean said Sunday night in Ankeny, Iowa.

"All the other Democrats pounced on me and beat me up and said
how ignorant I was about foreign affairs," he said. "I think most
people in America agree with me today and it's only two weeks
later."

Dean has rocketed to the top of the Democratic presidential field
with his sharp attacks on Bush, especially on the war in Iraq. Far
from backing off his earlier comment about Hussein, Dean has
broadened the critique, adding mad cow disease, the national
deficit, HIV-AIDS and homeland security to the list of safety failures
during Bush's tenure.

"National security and economic security are the touchstones of the
election," he said in the interview after a rally Monday in Green
Bay, Wis. "I think the president has been fairly reckless in just
about every area I can think of."


Dean accused Bush of taking "enormous risks" by refusing to
negotiate with North Korea, permitting "warlords" to control much of
Afghanistan and failing to address the most serious threats to
homeland security.


"We've made progress" on strengthening defenses at home, he said.
"The problem is, on the things that are enormously important to us
we have apparently made no progress. That is the ultimate
nightmare of the so-called dirty bomb or a terrorist nuclear attack
on the United States."

As president, Dean said he would initiate bilateral negotiations
with North Korea, purchase the entire uranium stockpile held by
the former Soviet Union and shift more money into security
programs such as cargo ship inspections. "Why aren't these things
being done now?" he said. "Why have we dillydallied for 15 months?"

Dean, leading in many polls in early nominating states such as New
Hampshire and Iowa, is also on the verge of setting a Democratic
fundraising record of $40 million. Aides announced Monday that the
campaign had raised more than $14 million for the final quarter of
the year from 280,000 contributors. The total is likely to climb by at
least $400,000 before the official closing date with more than 1,300
fundraising house parties scheduled for Tuesday night.

Wesley K. Clark is the only candidate who will come close to Dean
this quarter -- aides said Monday the retired general will top $10
million. Sen. John F. Kerry (Mass.) is tapping his own fortune to
keep pace with Dean.

Dean received glowing praise Monday from Wisconsin Gov. Jim
Doyle and the endorsement of Rep. John Conyers Jr. (Mich.), the
dean of the Congressional Black Caucus.

"I am proud to state and stand with the man that's ahead of
everybody else, that is raising money from the little guys to the
shock of everybody who thought it should always be the big fat cats,"
Conyers said at a Detroit rally Monday afternoon.


As he traveled across the Midwest, Dean hit familiar themes but
with the fresh twist that they fall under the broader rubric of safety
and security.

On domestic policy, Dean said the current $500 billion deficit and
losses of nearly 3 million jobs have created widespread economic
insecurity. If elected, he promised to raise the national minimum
wage to $7 per hour, up from $5.15.

"Our philosophy is give the working people a little more money and
they might be able to go down and spend something on Main
Street," he told the audience of labor and African American activists
here in Detroit.

Rising deficits and a large national debt mean people cannot find
jobs,
Dean said, and undermine U.S. authority overseas by forcing
the government to look to nations such as China and Saudi Arabia
for loans.

More than once, Dean drew direct connections between Bush's
10-year, $3 trillion tax cuts and critical security investments. "If
you think tax cuts are more important than homeland security,
then I think you've made a mistake as president, and clearly that
puts us in greater danger," he said in the interview.

A physician, Dean also accused the administration of stubbornly
ignoring warnings about mad cow disease and blindly promoting an
abstinence-only sex education program that "is not a good solution
at all for teens who have decided to have sex."

It may not be fair to blame the president for the recent mad cow
case, Dean told Iowa audiences, but Bush is responsible for failing
to enact broader cattle testing requirements, he said.

"Ordinary farmers in Iowa can't sell their calves right now because
the president of the United States did not take the precautions that
we could have easily predicted," he said. By choosing "ideology over
facts," he added, the Republican administration is "not only a
failure, but the most dangerous administration in my lifetime."

washingtonpost.com
© 2003 The Washington Post Company



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)1/3/2004 2:09:57 AM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3079
 
Who's Nader Now?
The New York Times

January 2, 2004

OP-ED COLUMNIST

By PAUL KRUGMAN

In the 2000 election, in a campaign that seemed driven more by vanity
than by any realistic political vision, Ralph Nader did all he could to
undermine Al Gore - even though Mr. Gore, however unsatisfying
to the Naderites, was clearly a better choice than the current occupant of the
White House.

Now the Democratic Party has its own internal spoilers:
candidates lagging far behind in the race for the nomination
who seem more interested in
tearing down Howard Dean than in defeating George Bush.


The truth - which one hopes voters will remember, whoever gets
the nomination - is that the leading Democratic contenders share a lot of
common ground. Their domestic policy proposals are similar,
and very different from those of Mr. Bush.

Even on foreign policy, the differences are less stark than they
may appear. Wesley Clark's critiques of the Iraq war are every bit as stinging as Mr.
Dean's. And looking forward, I don't believe that even the pro-war
candidates would pursue the neocon vision of two, three, many Iraq-style wars.
Mr. Bush, who has made preemptive war the core of his foreign policy doctrine, might do just that.

Yet some of Mr. Dean's rivals have launched vitriolic attacks
that might as well have been scripted by Karl Rove.
And I don't buy the excuse that it's
all about ensuring that the party chooses an electable candidate.

It's true that if Mr. Dean gets the nomination,
the Republicans will attack him as a wild-eyed liberal
who is weak on national security. But they
would do the same to any Democrat - even Joseph Lieberman.
Facts, or the lack thereof, will prove no obstacle: remember the successful attacks
on the patriotism of Max Cleland, who lost three limbs in Vietnam, or the Saddam-Daschle ads.

Mr. Dean's character will also come under attack.
But this, too, will happen to any Democrat. If we've learned anything in this past decade, it's
that the right-wing scandal machine will find a way to smear anyone,
and that a lot of the media will play along. A year ago, when John Kerry was
the presumptive front-runner, he came under
assault - I am not making this up - over the supposed price of his haircuts.
Sure enough, a CNN
host solemnly declared him in "denial mode."

That's not to say that a candidate's qualifications don't
matter: it would be nice if Mr. Dean were a decorated war hero.
But there's nothing in the polling data suggesting that Mr. Dean
is less electable than his Democratic rivals, with the possible
exception of General Clark. Mr. Dean's rivals
may well believe that he will lose the election if he is nominated.
But it's inexcusable when they try to turn that belief into a self-fulfilling
prophecy.

Let me suggest a couple of ground rules. First, while it's
O.K. for a candidate to say he's more electable than his rival,
someone who really cares about ousting Mr. Bush shouldn't pre-emptively
surrender the cause by claiming that his rival has no chance.
Yet Mr. Lieberman and Mr. Kerry
have done just that. To be fair, Mr. Dean's warning that his ardent
supporters might not vote for a "conventional Washington politician" was a bit
close to the line, but it appeared to be a careless rather than a vindictive remark.

More important, a Democrat shouldn't say anything that
could be construed as a statement that Mr. Bush is preferable to his rival.
Yet after Mr. Dean declared that Saddam's capture hadn't made us
safer - a statement that seems more justified with
each passing day - Mr. Lieberman and,
to a lesser extent, Mr. Kerry launched attacks that could,
and quite possibly will, be used verbatim in Bush campaign ads. (Mr. Lieberman's remark
about Mr. Dean's "spider hole" was completely beyond the pale.)

The irony is that by seeking to undermine the election prospects
of a man who may well be their party's nominee, Mr. Lieberman and Mr. Kerry
have reminded us of why their once-promising campaigns imploded.
Most Democrats feel, with justification, that we're facing a national crisis -
that the right, ruthlessly exploiting 9/11, is making a grab for
total political dominance. The party's rank and file want a candidate who is running,
as the Dean slogan puts it, to take our country back.
This is no time for a candidate who is running just because he thinks he deserves to be
president.

Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
nytimes.com



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)1/3/2004 2:15:15 AM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 3079
 
Message 19648578



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)1/4/2004 1:05:33 AM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 3079
 
Dean Now Willing to Discuss His Faith
Campaign Changed Him, Candidate Says


By Jim VandeHei
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, January 4, 2004; Page A01

STORM LAKE, Iowa, Jan. 3 -- Howard Dean, after practicing a
quiet Christianity throughout his political career, said he is
talking more about his faith because the presidential race has
awakened him to the importance of religious expression,
especially to southerners.

"I am not used to wearing
religion on my sleeve and
being open about it," the
former Vermont governor
told reporters aboard his
campaign plane late
Friday night. "I am
gradually getting more
comfortable to talk about
religion in ways I did not
talk about it before."

Dean said frequent trips
to South Carolina, where
evangelical Christianity flourishes often in public ways, are
prompting him to more candidly discuss his faith. "It does not
make me more religious or less religious than before. It just
means I am more comfortable talking about it in different ways,"
he said.

He cited the Gospels -- Matthew, Mark, Luke and John -- as a
strong influence. The Gospels tell the story of the life and
teachings of Jesus Christ. "As I have gotten older I have thought
about what it means to be a Christian and what the role of
religion is in my life," Dean said

Dean's comments about Christianity provide a rare, if obscured,
look at the Democrat who is leading in the polls. He has seldom
talked about his family, feelings or religion when campaigning,
unlike other candidates who discuss such issues to connect with
voters on a personal level.

"The campaign has changed the way I am willing to talk about
religion. It has not changed my religious beliefs," Dean reiterated
Saturday.

In some ways, Dean is coming to acknowledge a reality of
American politics: Voters, particularly in the South, want to hear
more about faith and morality from national leaders. This
phenomenon has hurt Democrats and helped President Bush,
according to strategists from both parties. A recent poll showed
63 percent of voters who regularly attend church back Bush,
while a similar percentage of those who rarely or never attend
lean toward Democrats. A small shift in support of religious
voters could provide a big boost to the Democratic nominee.

Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (Conn.), an orthodox Jew, and Al
Sharpton, a minister, are the two Democratic presidential
candidates who have given their faith and God a role in their
campaign rhetoric. Retired Gen. Wesley K. Clark recently said
faith will become a centerpiece of his campaign message, too.
Dean is still wrestling with how prominent a place faith should
take in his campaign. The more he talks about it, though, the
more comfortable he feels, an aide said.

"I am still learning a lot about faith and the South and how
important it is," said Dean, a Congregationalist. The
Congregationalist Church is a Christian denomination that
preaches a personal relationship with God without a strong
hierarchal structure guiding it. Dean was reared an
Episcopalian, but left the church 25 years ago in a dispute with a
local Vermont church over efforts to build a bike path. Dean's
wife is Jewish, as are their two children.

"Faith is important in a lot of places, but it is really important in
the South -- I think I did not understand fully how comfortably
religion fits in with daily life -- for both black and white
populations in the South," he said. Dean has visited South
Carolina, which holds its presidential primary Feb. 3, nine times
since the beginning of the campaign. "The people there are
pretty openly religious, and it plays an ingrained role in people's
daily lives," he said.

Dean's decision reflects the evolution of a candidate who earlier
in the campaign said it was the New England tradition to practice
religion quietly. Still, Dean's remarks about his faith have been
mostly confined to discussions with reporters and campaign
stops at African American churches in South Carolina. At the
same time, he tells Democratic audiences to move elections away
from "guns, God and gays."

"What I have not done is figured out is how to talk about [my
faith] publicly," he said.

The Democratic front-runner probably will not have much time
to elaborate until the presidential race heads South on Feb. 3,
an aide said Saturday. But if he wins the nomination, polls show
voters want to hear more about faith from political leaders. The
general election campaign is when Dean might open up more,
the aide said.

The last two Democrats to win the White House -- Bill Clinton
and Jimmy Carter -- evoked God and their faith. Both are
Christians. Some Democrats have said that Dean may be
perceived as too secular because of his affiliation with civil
unions for gays, which many Christians oppose.

President Bush, a born-again Christian, is one of the most
openly religious presidents in generations and enjoys very
strong backing in the South, according to recent polls. In 2000,
he won every state in the Bible Belt. It would be tough, though
not impossible, for a Democrat to defeat Bush without making
inroads in the South, strategists from both parties say.

Dean said he prays daily and has read the Bible from cover to
cover. "If there was one experience that deepened my religious
faith," Dean said Saturday, "it was the capture of my brother [in
Laos] almost 30 years ago."


He rarely attends church services, unless it is for a political
event. When he talks about Jesus, he usually focuses on
Christianity's teachings about helping the poor and less
fortunate.

When asked Friday night about his favorite book of the New
Testament, he cited Job, about a righteous man whose faith was
tested mightily by God through great suffering. After thinking
about the scripture, Dean pointed out an hour later that Job is
from the Old Testament. Dean said Job reinforces the
uncomfortable fact of life that "terrible things can happen to very
good people for no good reason."

"I think all human beings have to have an explanation for why
bad things happen to good people," which resonates with him, in
part, because the suffering he witnessed as a medical doctor,
Dean said.


At a breakfast here Saturday, Dean had an opportunity to
discuss his faith when an Iowan asked what sustains the
front-runner when his rivals are relentlessly criticizing him.
Instead, Dean shared a secular belief in the power of people to
change government.

A few minutes later, when discussing corporate greed, Dean
promised if elected president to call business leaders from
around the country into the White House to stress ethics and
responsibility. "Moral tone is a huge deal in the presidency," he
told the audience.

© 2004 The Washington Post Company
washingtonpost.com



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)1/9/2004 8:23:44 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 3079
 
"if the Bush "recovery" heats up much more, we wonder whether
anyone will have a job."


Editorial: The jobless 'recovery'

madison.com

An editorial
January 8, 2004

The United States Department of Labor announced
this week that, over the course of last year,
American businesses cut 1,236,426 jobs in 2003,
exposing the lie of President Bush's so-called
economic "recovery."

Far from easing up, the cuts increased as 2003 went
on - the final quarter of the year saw 364,346 job
cut announcements, making it the worst quarter for
such announcements in 2003.

"(It) is difficult to get too excited about a year in which more than 1.2 million people fell
victim to downsizing," says employment analyst John Challenger.

We agree. Indeed, if the Bush "recovery" heats up much more, we wonder whether
anyone will have a job.

Published: 6:22 AM 1/08/04



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)1/10/2004 10:30:19 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 3079
 
"Medical expenses are one of the leading causes of
bankruptcy in the U.S"


Article: Sick State Budgets, Sick Kids
Author: BOB HERBERT
Source: The New York Times
Date: January 9, 2004
Reference: nytimes.com

Full story: Message 19677830



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)1/13/2004 7:09:16 PM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3079
 

Stand Up Now with Howard Dean


deanforamerica.com

Excerpt from a message by Howard Dean

" In these final days before the Iowa caucuses they're going to
throw everything they can at us. We've seen it already. The
pundits are on TV focusing more on a horse race than on the
issues that face our country. And the establishment
candidates - instead of talking to voters about why they
supported the war or voted for President Bush's reckless tax
cuts - are spending their time trying to distort what it is we're
fighting for. Make no mistake - these attacks are meant to
keep Iowans from going to their caucus for Howard Dean.
They're designed to keep you from taking action to help us
win. They'll make incredible statements in these last few
days, banking that the election will be over before anyone
can challenge the truth of what they're saying. But you can
show them that the politics of the past are over by helping us
win Iowa."



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)1/15/2004 4:40:22 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 3079
 
Braun Quits Presidential Race,
Backs Dean


story.news.yahoo.com

By NEDRA PICKLER, Associated Press Writer

CARROLL, Iowa - Former Illinois Sen. Carol Moseley Braun (news -
web sites) quit the Democratic presidential race Thursday and endorsed
Howard Dean as the best choice to "renew our
country and restore our privacy, our liberty and our economic security."

"Gov. Dean has the energy to inspire the
American people, to break the cocoon of fear
that envelopes us and empowers President
Bush and his entourage
from the extreme right-wing," she said at a
joint appearance with the former Vermont
governor.


Braun's own campaign failed to generate
significant campaign funds or support in
national or state polls, and she conceded as
much. "The funding and organizational
disadvantages of a non-traditional campaign
could not be overcome," she said.

Dean, thanking Braun for her endorsement,
said he hoped it would hasten the day when a
woman or minority candidate could win the
White House. "I'm going to miss you at those
debates, stepping in and defending me from
those outrageous things people say," he
added. That was a reference to her remarks
last Sunday night, after Al Sharpton
had challenged Dean's
gubernatorial record on hiring minorities.

Whatever the long-term advantage to Dean, the immediate impact of
Braun's endorsement was likely to be minor. She polled less than one
percent support in one recent survey of likely Iowa caucus-goers, and
blacks account for roughly two percent of the state's population.

Braun, the only woman and one of two African-Americans in the race,
left the field four days ahead of the Iowa caucuses.

Her departure left eight men vying for the Democratic nomination to
challenge President Bush this fall. Another contender, Florida Sen. Bob
Graham, folded his campaign last year.

Dean's campaign manager, Joe Trippi, said before the announcement
that Braun approached the former Vermont governor after a recent
debate and told him she was considering leaving the race and backing
him. Braun is giving Dean her endorsement even as he has faced
questions about his record on race issues, including his lack of minority
Cabinet members during his five terms as Vermont governor.

Braun never broke out of single digits in national and state polls and
failed to qualify for several state ballots.

And though she had been endorsed by two influential women's groups -
the National Organization for Women (news - web sites) and the National
Women's Political Caucus - that support failed to translate into
financial support. Braun struggled to raise money while running up
thousands of dollars in debt. She also missed the deadline to file
paperwork for the initial round of federal campaign money, delaying for
several weeks the receipt of any federal matching funds, expected to
amount to several hundred thousand dollars.

Even her own campaign manager, Patricia Ireland, had said publicly that
there was no way Braun could win the nomination.

She leaves the race after having little impact on it, except for some bright
moments in debates. Braun often stressed during the campaign that she
was running for president because it was time to "take the 'Men Only'
sign off the White House door."

Rival Joe Lieberman (news - web sites) offered words of praise for Braun,
but little comment about her endorsement of Dean, calling her "an able
and eloquent person, an honorable person. When I'm president of the
United States, I'm going to convince Carol Moseley Braun to work in my
administration."

Dennis Kucinich (news - web sites) said, "I'll miss her," and expressed
the hope that she persuades Dean on a single-payer, universal health
care policy.

The run for president also may have helped Braun rehabilitate her image.
Elected to the Senate in 1992 during the "Year of the Woman," Braun
lost the seat after one term due to allegations about her ethics and
improper campaign spending.

Braun also was criticized for meeting in 1996 with Gen. Sani Abacha,
the late dictator of Nigeria who had been accused of myriad human
rights violations, during a trip to the country for a friend's memorial. She
did not tell the State Department in advance, which she later said she
regretted not doing.

After losing the Senate seat, President Clinton (news - web sites) named
her ambassador to New Zealand.

___

carolforpresident.com



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)1/24/2004 4:09:31 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 3079
 
Dean Alleges Dirty Attacks in Iowa

story.news.yahoo.com

By NEDRA PICKLER, Associated Press Writer

DOVER, N.H. - Howard Dean said Saturday the
was surprised by the "under the table" campaigning he faced during the
Iowa caucus and said the state needs to prevent such negative attacks if
it wants to keep the nation's leadoff presidential vote.

Dean said his rivals "had their folks really
beating up on the people who went in, trying
to get them to change their minds in
caucus."


"I think Iowa is going to have to change the
way it conducts its caucuses if it wants to
continue to be first," he told reporters in an
interview on his campaign bus in New
Hampshire.

Democratic National Committee rules prohibit any state from
holding a nominating caucus before Iowa's
caucus and New Hampshire's primary.
Officials from other states have protested
that the two state have such a
disproportionate influence on the
presidential election. But Iowa and New
Hampshire are fiercely protective of their
special status.

Dean came in a distant third in Iowa behind
Sens. John Kerry of
Massachusetts and John Edwards of North Carolina. He's looking for
a win in New Hampshire to help recover from
the disappointing showing.

Dean has blamed his Iowa loss on negative
attacks that he suffered as a one-time
front-runner in the race.
He said Saturday
that he would not start attacking Kerry in an
effort to bring him down.

But he did point out that he and Kerry had
taken different positions on both wars
against Iraq . Dean
supported the invasion under the first
President Bush while
Kerry voted against it. Dean opposed the
invasion of Iraq last year while Kerry voted
for the resolution authorizing the U.S.-led
war.

"Here is a gentleman who's running, who
votes no in 1991 when there are troops in Kuwait and the oil fields are on
fire, and then votes yes and there turns out not to be a threat," Dean
said. "I would be deeply concerned about that kind of judgment in the
White House. His voting record on Iraq is exactly the opposite of mine,
and I think my position has proven to be right twice."


Asked Saturday for specifics about the negative attacks, Dean pointed
to a book distributed by North Carolina Sen. John Edwards' campaign
that instructed supporters how to attack other candidates during the
caucuses. For example, it told campaign captains in Iowa to describe
Dean as an "elitist from Park Avenue in New York City."


"I never dreamed that would happen," Dean said. "And I don't think that's
a healthy thing for democracy. It's enough to have it go on for weeks and
weeks in the press, but when it goes on inside the caucus, I don't think
that's good," he said.

Edwards, who has credited his strong second-place showing in Iowa to
campaigning on a positive message, said he did not know about the
book until this week. He said he took full responsibility for it and
instructed his campaign never to let it happen again.

Dean came in a distant third in Iowa, while Sen. John Kerry of
Massachusetts won the state. Dean said the negative tactics are "a real
problem for Iowa."

"I mean, I like the Iowa caucuses a lot and I think they should be first,
but they've got to have a process that's good for democracy," he said.
"And the kind of stuff that's gone on - you know on the phone calls and
all that stuff under the table - is not particularly good for democracy."

After Dean's remarks, his spokesman, Doug Thornell, clarified that Dean
would protect Iowa's right to have the nation's first caucus.

"Governor Dean loves Iowa and when elected president, he will ensure
that Iowa retains its status as first in the nation," Thornell said.

Meanwhile, Dean has cut back his television advertising in states with
Feb. 3 contests to concentrate his spending on New Hampshire. He is
pouring in about $500,000 through Tuesday's primary and his ads in New
Mexico ended Wednesday. Commercials in South Carolina and Arizona
will stop running this weekend.

"Things are closing fast," he said Saturday in Somersworth, N.H. "We
can win this. What we are seeing in the last few days is that people who
went away from us after we lost Iowa are coming back."

"There are a lot of people who are going from other
candidates into the undecided column," Dean told a
rally of volunteers.

Jay Carson, a Dean spokesman, said the campaign has
not yet decided how many days it will be in the dark in
New Mexico, Arizona and South Carolina.

"We're assessing that right now. We still have strong
organizations in all of those places," he said. "But we're
focusing on New Hampshire right now in terms of our
advertising."



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)1/26/2004 4:51:33 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 3079
 
Rivals Mine Kerry Senate Years for Material to Slow Him Down

"For example, at the end of the cold war, Mr. Kerry advocated
scaling back the Central Intelligence Agency, but after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, he
complained about a lack of intelligence capability. In the 1980's,
he opposed the death penalty for terrorists who killed Americans abroad, but he
now supports the death penalty for terrorist acts. In the 1990's,
he joined with Republican senators to sponsor proposals to end tenure for public
school teachers and allow direct grants to religion-based charities,
measures that many Democratic groups opposed. In 1997, he voted to require
elderly people with higher incomes to pay a larger share of Medicare premiums."

By TODD S. PURDUM
Source: The New York Times
Date: January 25, 2004
Reference: nytimes.com
Full story:
Message 19734574



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)1/27/2004 1:10:02 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 3079
 
Dean smokes opponents in cigar store's matchbox poll

portsmouthherald.com
By Rochelle Stewart
news@seacoastonline.com

PORTSMOUTH - The results are in for one New
Hampshire primary poll, and former Vermont Gov.
Howard Dean came out on top.

On Sunday, the Federal Cigar Store on Ladd
Street announced the results of its "matchbox
primary poll." Dean won the election, receiving 35
percent of the votes, and Rep. Dennis Kucinich
came in second with 14 percent of the votes.
Sen. John Kerry followed closely behind with 13
percent of the votes, while retired Gen. Wesley
Clark took 10 percent of the votes, as did
President George W. Bush. Sen. Joe Lieberman
took 5 percent of the votes, and the Rev. Al Sharpton, Rep. Dick Gephardt and
former Sen. Carol Mosley Braun all tied for last place with 2 percent of the votes
each. In total, 168 ballots were cast.

The "matchbox primary poll" is a 20-year-old local tradition where customers who
wish to participate are given a book of matches seven days before the election
and asked to drop it into the paper bag that displays the name of their preferred
candidate. Just last Tuesday, Dean stopped at the Federal Cigar store to cast
his own vote.

Leonard Seagren, owner of the store, was unavailable to comment on the results
Monday afternoon; however, a store clerk, who wished to remain anonymous,
said the election went well and they were happy with the results.



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)1/28/2004 8:53:40 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 3079
 
Howard Dean's Speech to Supporters in New Hampshire

January 27, 2004

TEXT

" The following is the text of Gov. Howard Dean's speech after the New Hampshire
Democratic primary, as recorded by The New York Times."


nytimes.com

GOV. HOWARD DEAN." Thank you. My goodness. Thank you. Wow.
Thank you. Well, that was - Michael - we really are going to win this
nomination, aren't we? You are amazing. You are amazing."

Full story:

Message 19744795



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)1/30/2004 12:43:20 AM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 3079
 
Howard Dean humanizes politics
seattlepi.nwsource.com
By CHI-DOOH LI
SPECIAL TO THE POST-INTELLIGENCER

Two weeks ago, Iowa's caucuses showed us that the shiny
crown previously placed on Howard Dean's noggin by
pollsters and the news media, emblematic of the
Democratic Party's anointed champion to oust George W.
Bush from the White House, turned out to be a Toys R Us
99-cent special.

Two days ago, New Hampshire voters confirmed that Dean's
supposed coronation, before any votes had been cast, was
indeed premature.

Thus the Democratic primary season promises us fun and
surprises by the boatload, which is the way it ought to be,
and the reason why presidential politics will always be a
fascinating subject.

I am grateful for Dean's frenzied outburst on the night of
the Iowa caucuses. He may have scared the living daylights
out of a whole lot of voters and done major damage to his
own campaign, but he did the American political system an
enormous favor.

Simply put, he brought the human element back into
politics.

Dean reminded us, in an age when technologically savvy
managers and handlers dictate to candidates how they
should think, what they should say and how they should
dress, that politics is still very much a human endeavor and
thus entirely unpredictable.

Political science is a misnomer and oxymoron if ever there
was one.

Politics is as far from being a science as I am from being
Albert Einstein.

For the past 40 years or so, beginning in the ivied halls of
academia, very bright and just as misguided men and
women have systematically attempted to steal the soul from
American politics.

Obsessed with making politics into something measurable,
they have steadily injected it with increasingly strong doses
of statistical methods and quantitative analysis. The holy
grail of this endeavor is to devise models that can predict
human political behavior and thereby convert politics into a
true science.

When politics becomes a science, practitioners will be able
to control what was previously uncontrollable. Nothing
need be left to chance.

Skilled professionals would call the shots, and run a
campaign (and a candidate) by precise formulas.

Polls and focus groups, census tract statistics and past
elections records will yield all the information needed to
formulate the exact plan of action needed to win an
election. Provided the money can be raised to implement
the plan, success is certifiable.

Forget about vision. Humbug on deep personal conviction.
Experience matters not a whit (see case study on Gov.
Arnold Schwarzenegger). When politics becomes a science,
you can take a warm body off the street, create a political
persona and produce a winning candidate.

If you're anything like me, and rebel against the increasing
technological control and manipulation of our lives, you will
find the notion repugnant that pseudo-scientists, armed
with signed integers and computer models, presume to
predict the choices you and I will make in the ballot box.

You will chafe, like I do, at high-priced campaign
consultants who remake a candidate into the image that
fits the computer model for a successful race.

Such efforts range from dressing a candidate in sweaters of
a certain color to "warm up" a naturally aloof demeanor, to
dictating a change in a candidate's position on issues to
come across more politically acceptable to a greater number
of voters.

Better to know the real person behind that expert-designed
façade during the campaign and not be in for an
unpleasant surprise after the candidate is elected.

Pundits, political writers and cartoonists mercilessly have
pounded on Dean for his Iowa post-caucus speech. Some
question whether he can recover from this supposed
mother of all gaffes. His own staff members even look on it
as a huge mistake.

Mine may be a lonely voice but I find it refreshing that
Dean cut loose and spoke his mind that night, much like
John McCain did four years ago. I appreciate that these
men show us what they're really made of. Whether either
would make a good president should have nothing to do
with something so thoroughly human as outbursts of
emotion and candor.

We ought to welcome more honesty and emotion in political
campaigns, not less. The candidates I fear, and will never
vote for, are the chameleons who always say what they
think I want to hear and whose exteriors are made of an
impenetrable veneer that will not show us what is inside.

Let's get off Howard Dean's back and praise him instead of
ridiculing him for showing us his real persona.

Let's welcome foibles, as well as strengths, back into
political campaigns.

Let's put the soul back into politics.

Chi-Dooh Li is a Seattle attorney. E- mail: cli@elmlaw.com



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)1/30/2004 3:41:08 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 3079
 
Democratic Contenders Attack Bush on Iraq, Terrorism,
Trade and Economy

The New York Times

January 30, 2004

By KATHARINE Q. SEELYE and DAVID M. HALBFINGER

The following are excerpts from the article:

GREENVILLE, S.C., Jan. 29 - The Democratic presidential contenders
attacked President Bush on Thursday for his handling of Iraq and
terrorism and for his stance on trade and the economy
and insisted that their party would be able to compete against him in the South.

Their exchanges, at a debate in one of the seven states with
nominating contests Tuesday, reflected the changed dynamics of the presidential race
since Senator John Kerry won the first two contests, in Iowa and New Hampshire.

Howard Dean, shifting easily to dart thrower from the target
he played in earlier debates, questioned Senator Kerry's record and effectiveness. Dr.
Dean's challenge came more than midway through a debate
that up until then had been largely civil, with the seven candidates focusing their fire
on Mr. Bush instead of on one another.

"Just to make this a little less mellow," Dr. Dean began,
setting up a suggestion that Mr. Kerry had little to show for his 19 years in Washington.
"When I was governor, I got everybody in my state who is under 18 health insurance.

"Now, Senator Kerry is the front-runner, and I mean him no insult,
but in 19 years in the Senate, Senator Kerry sponsored nine, 11 bills that had
anything to do with health care, and not one of them passed.
If you want a president who is going to get results, I suggest that you look at
somebody who did get results in my state."

Dr. Dean, subdued but seeming a bit prickly over his campaign's
sinking fortunes, also suggested that the other candidates had appropriated his
themes.

"Everybody on this stage, or a lot of people on this stage have now
embraced my message," he said. "They all talk about change. They all talk about
bringing people into the party. The truth is, I stood up for that message
when nobody else would."



Still the candidates generally focused on what they described
as President Bush's failures, faulting him for his conduct on national security and on
the economy…………………………………..

Senators Edwards and Kerry and Dr. Dean all called for an
independent commission to investigate the intelligence on which Mr. Bush relied to
argue that Saddam Hussein had unconventional weapons.

The candidates also seemed to want to impress Southern
voters here in the state seen as the gateway to the Southern primaries.

Dr. Dean
emphasized his good relations with the National Rifle Association,
saying he had worked with the gun lobby to set aside thousands of
acres for conservation and hunting………………………

The candidates also discussed the economy in a state that has
lost more jobs than at any time since the Great Depression, seen its manufacturing
base steadily disappear overseas and watched 65,000 jobs in the
textile industry alone vanish in the last 10 years.

Dr. Dean
said that the North American Free Trade Agreement ought
to be changed to extend labor and environmental protections to America's
trading partners.

"You've got to put the emphasis on fair trade, not free trade," he said.
"And what the problem has been that when the Clinton administration and
the Bush administration continued to push this, only half the job was done.
We forgot about the workers."………….

Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
nytimes.com



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)2/1/2004 8:03:01 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 3079
 
Fighting words from Dean stir faithful here

By David Postman
Seattle Times chief political reporter

Struggling presidential candidate
Howard Dean used a speech to a
yelling, stomping, liberal Seattle crowd
yesterday to paint fellow-Democrat
John Kerry and President Bush as twin
tools of special interests.

Dean railed against Kerry, the
Massachusetts senator who has
supplanted Dean as the front-runner in
the Democratic race, and said news
yesterday that Kerry took more lobbyist
money than any other member of the
Senate made him so mad he was
sputtering.

"This is the challenge for the
Democratic Party: Do we stand with
the special interests and the
Washington cozy crowd, or do we
stand with ordinary Americans who we
have claimed to represent?" Dean said to an overflow crowd at Seattle's
Town Hall.


Dean was in Seattle to win support in the state's Feb. 7 Democratic
caucuses. Underscoring the importance of a possible win here, which could
be his first, Dean told reporters he would be back once more before
Saturday's party gatherings.

Meanwhile, Kerry and the other Democrats running for the nomination
concentrated on the seven states that hold contests Tuesday.

Dean, the former governor of Vermont,
showed a different style from that of his
previous visits here. No longer the fall
front-runner or the insurgent of last
spring, he is trying to make a
comeback after losses in Iowa and New
Hampshire.

Town Hall was a familiar spot. He spoke
to another standing-room-only crowd
there last May when he was riding an
anti-war message to prominence in the
crowded Democratic race.

From his first lines yesterday, it was clear he was taking a different tack.

"When I came here the last time, the biggest issue was the war," Dean said
to more than 1,200 people. "It's still a big issue. But there's another issue,
and that's the issue of special interests running this government."

The crowd still roared at any anti-war talk. But Dean said in an interview
afterward that most Americans, although maybe not yet Seattle-area
Democrats, have other things on their minds today.

"I think the American public has moved
their attention," Dean said. "It's not as
important an issue. People are losing
their jobs. They are losing their health
insurance. People are losing hope in
the country. I think they are just
throwing up their hands, saying, 'My
God, what's happening here?' "

Dean lays most of the blame for those
problems on Bush. But in yesterday's
news, he found a way to loop Kerry into
it as well.

The Washington Post reported
yesterday that federal campaign fund-raising records show Kerry has raised
more money from paid lobbyists than any other senator over the past 15
years.


Kerry has made fighting Washington special interests a key of his
campaign. But Dean said the money from lobbyists shows a similarity
between Bush and Kerry.

"It seems to me sometimes there's a little of George Bush in John Kerry,"
Dean said in the interview. "George Bush says the most blatant things that
are just plain false.

" 'No Child Left Behind' leaves every child behind, which is something John
Kerry voted for," Dean said of the president's education plan. "How many
rationales has George Bush given us for the Iraq war? Well, how many
rationales has John Kerry given us for the Iraq war, which he also
supported?" ……….




" For Dean, Washington state has been a
good source of money and some of his
biggest and most enthusiastic crowds.

A rally at Westlake Center in August
drew more than 8,000 people. It was the
largest crowd Dean had drawn
anywhere to that date.

"It was just stunning to me to see out on a big plaza like that and see
people as far as you could go," Dean recalled yesterday. "It was the only
time I'd been nervous in the campaign. I just went, 'My God, I'm responsible
for all these people.' "

It was a relaxed Dean who sat for a 30-minute interview that covered:

o The resignation of his campaign manager, Joe Trippi. "I do not blame him
for one thing that went wrong with the campaign," Dean said. "You can put
the blame at my feet for anything that went wrong."

The candidate said he signed off on every important decision and every
expenditure in Iowa and New Hampshire. He did say that as he went out to
give his now-infamous speech after the Iowa caucuses, Trippi told him
something along the lines of "let it rip."

But Dean said his test of how well he
does in a speech is to watch it with the
sound turned off. "I give myself an A for
my speech in Iowa," he said. "I was
smiling. I was pumped up. I was having
a great time. I'd be the first to confess it
wasn't very presidential."


o The appearance of his wife, Judith
Steinberg Dean, on the campaign trail.
Much was made when Dean's wife
appeared in Iowa and then made a
national TV appearance with the
candidate because she had strenuously
avoided campaigning and Dean said he
would not use her as a prop. She may
do more, though.

Dean said when he talked to his wife
yesterday, on their wedding
anniversary, she surprised him by
saying, " 'I'll come out anytime you
want.' A woman who has spent 12
years avoiding public life? I couldn't
believe it."


In his speech yesterday, Dean
defended his idea to repeal all of the
Bush tax cuts and use the money to
reduce the deficit and provide universal
health insurance. The tax cuts have
come at the cost of higher
health-insurance premiums, college
tuition costs and property taxes, he
argued, adding up to "the largest
middle-class tax increase in the history
of the United States of America," a
claim largely difficult to verify.


Dean received one of his biggest
ovations after a heckler asked what he'd
do to reduce the abortion rate. He suggested universal health care for
children, sex education that isn't just abstinence-based, and finally, "We're
going to tell all those white boys who run the Republican Party to stay out of
our bedrooms."

Dean knows, though, that the screaming crowd is not representative of
voters across the country and volume does not equal delegates.

"You can be as enthusiastic as you want in here and hoot and holler, but if
you don't translate that into votes we're not going to make it," Dean said
before adding a more positive spin. "We're going to win sooner or later, but
I'd rather it be sooner than later."

David Postman: 360-943-9882 or dpostman@seattletimes.com

Staff reporter J. Patrick Coolican contributed to this story.

seattletimes.nwsource.com



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)2/2/2004 10:20:08 PM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3079
 
Profile of Presidential Candidate Howard Dean

Sun Feb 1,12:30 PM ET



WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Here are key facts about former
Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, a candidate for the
Democratic presidential nomination:

POSITIONS ON KEY ISSUES:

IRAQ - Vigorously opposes the war and
criticized other Democrats for failing to do
so.

ECONOMY - Would repeal all the $1.7
trillion in tax cuts won by President Bush
to use toward health
care, homeland security and job creation.

Supports continuing funding for Social
Security .

HEALTH CARE - Dean proposes to expand
health care coverage. His plan, estimated to
cost $88 billion a year, would widen federal
and state programs to provide coverage to
everyone up to age 25 and lower-income
adults. It would also allow higher-income
adults to buy into a plan similar to the plan
for federal employees, and provide tax
credits.

OTHER ISSUES - Would provide $100
billion over two years to states and localities
to be used for infrastructure investments and
hiring and training related to homeland
security. Supports gay rights (he signed the
nation's first civil unions law)

POLITICAL CAREER:

Member of the Vermont House of
Representatives from 1982 to 1986

Lieutenant governor in 1986

Governor from 1991 with the death of Gov. Richard Snelling, until 2002

PERSONAL DETAILS:

Born: Nov. 17, 1948, in New York City

Married to Dr. Judith Steinberg, two children

Yale University graduating in political science in 1971 Albert Einstein
College of Medicine in New York City with an M.D. in 1978

Dean is the son of Wall Street broker Howard Brush Dean III, and was
raised on New York's Upper East Side

ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL:

He propelled the use of the Internet as his primary
tool for capturing support for his presidential bid.

Dean became the first Democrat to enter the
presidential race on May 31, 2002, and the first to
announce he would not accept public financing, and its
accompanying $45 million spending limit.

story.news.yahoo.com



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)2/12/2004 6:52:26 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 3079
 


John Nichols: Report agrees media unfair to
Dean

madison.com
By John Nichols
February 12, 2004

Howard Dean's supporters think he has gotten a raw deal
from the media. And their candidate does not disagree.


Even before the former front-runner stumbled in primary
and caucus states, Dean says he started taking hits from
media insiders who he says feared handing the
Democratic presidential nomination to an outsider.

"I think I scared them. I think it goes back to when Al
Gore endorsed me, and AFSCME and the SEIU; people in
the establishment began to think I could win," Dean says,
recalling the heady days last fall when he accumulated
endorsements from top Democrats and labor unions.
"That scared the hell out of them because they knew I
didn't owe anybody. I didn't owe them a dime.
Eighty-nine percent of our money comes from small
donors. That's certainly not true of anybody else running
for president on either side."

The "them" Dean is referring to are the Washington-based political pundits, commentators and
reporters who shape the discussion of presidential politics on television and on the pages of
America's elite newspapers. "I think the media is part of the established group in Washington.
They have a little club there," says Dean. "If you don't go down to kiss the ring, they get upset
by that. I don't play the game. I pretty much say what I think. That makes a lot of people
uncomfortable."

Initially, Dean says, he felt he could take the hits. After all, media outlets that once dismissed
him as the "asterisk" candidate from Vermont helped to make him a national figure when they
featured him on magazine covers and news shows last fall.

But, after what he refers to as a "pep talk" to backers after his defeat in the Iowa caucuses
began airing around-the-clock on cable news programs as the "I Have a Scream" speech, Dean
says he began to fully understand how events can be warped by the media.

"ABC actually did a fairly sound retraction on that one," Dean says of a report by ABC News
that showed the "scream" in Des Moines was dramatically amplified in television and cable
reports. "But that's one network, and one report. Most of the networks failed to offer any
perspective."

Dean does not suggest that he has run an error-free campaign. He admits to plenty of
mistakes. But his complaint that he has not gotten fair coverage is echoed in a report from the
Center for Media and Public Affairs. The center's study of 187 CBS, NBC and ABC evening news
reports found that only 49 percent of all on-air evaluations of Dean in 2003 were positive. The
other Democratic contenders collectively received 78 percent favorable coverage during the
period.

In the week after the Iowa caucuses, the center found that only 39 percent of the coverage of
Dean on network evening news programs was positive; in contrast, 86 percent of the coverage
of North Carolina Sen. John Edwards was positive, as was 71 percent of the coverage of
Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, the new front-runner.


Even CNN's general manager now admits that the cable networks overplayed the "scream" -
which was aired 633 times on national networks in the four days after Iowa voted on Jan. 19.

Yet, even as he tries to resurrect his campaign with a make-or-break push toward Wisconsin's
primary on Feb. 17, Dean does not talk much about media coverage of his campaign. Why?
"It's not central to the stump speech. If I were leading the polls by 20 percent, I could say
anything I wanted about the media," he explains. "But what I've discovered is that, if you
complain about the media, they write that you're whiny and complaining. So I don't complain
about the media."

That does not mean, however, that Dean does not think about how he would handle media
issues if elected. "I figure I'll win, and then I'll really complain about the media," he says.

What does Dean mean by that?

"I think democracy fails under a variety of conditions and one of the conditions occurs when
people don't have the ability to get the kind of information they need to make up their mind.
Ideologically, I don't care much for Fox News. But the truth is that, as long as there are
countervailing points of view available on the spectrum, it doesn't matter," says Dean, who
began speaking last year about the need to reduce the power of big media companies.

"Now, the last time I saw a statistic on this, I think that 90 percent of the American people got
their news from a handful of corporations," he adds. "That's not very good for democracy, and
that's not very good for America. If I become president of the United States, I'm going to
appoint a whole lot of different people to the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) so
that we start to make the media more diffuse, more responsible. I'd also like public airwaves
devoted to some public services - so that every single station serves the community where it is
located."

Dean dismisses the notion that proposals to break the grip of media conglomerates are radical.
"That's not radical at all," he says. "That's what we used to have. The right-wingers have
undone that over the last 15 or 20 years, and we need to go back to what we had to have a
sound democracy."

Dean also dismisses the notion that it would be difficult to get the American people to support a
challenge to big media. "I think the public would love what I was doing," he says of a
presidential assault on media monopolies. "The public doesn't particularly like the media, which
works in my favor."

Published: 6:34 AM 2/12/04



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)2/13/2004 6:26:07 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 3079
 
Combative Dean has yet to win, but he's not at a loss

Fri Feb 13, 6:21 AM ET

story.news.yahoo.com

As he unapologetically confronts what could be the last weeks of his
political career, Howard Dean has not mellowed. The
former Vermont governor and defrocked Democratic front-runner still
refuses, for the most part, to resort to the insincere platitudes that help
other candidates survive their campaign days without uttering an
unexpected syllable.


Near the end of a question-and-answer
session Thursday morning with voters at the
19th-century Oshkosh Opera House, a man
in the balcony tossed a softball in Dean's
direction. Identifying himself as a disgruntled
2000 Bush voter, the questioner lamented
the president's failure to lessen partisan
enmity in Washington and asked Dean what
he would do to end gridlock on Capitol Hill.

The standard political answer would have
been to piously vow to recreate the Era of
Good Feeling in Washington, despite
provocations from the opposition party. But
such gooey prattle about fostering
bipartisanship simply does not fit Dean's
nature.

Squinting at his questioner through the glare
of the TV lights, Dean said bluntly, "I haven't
promised to go to Washington and unify
everybody. And there's a reason for my not
making that promise. I think it's important to
stand up for what you believe in."

Then Dean uttered a few combative lines
that encapsulated the strengths and
weaknesses of his boom-or-bust campaign:
"I'm not going to Washington to be a nice
guy. I'm going to Washington to kick the
right wing out."

Now, in all likelihood, Dean will not be going
to Washington except as a tourist. That's
what happens to presidential dreams when
you lose 14 states in a row. There is a
reason top staffers at his Burlington, Vt.,
headquarters made a pilgrimage
Wednesday night to the local opening of the
Olympic hockey movie Miracle.

In an interview after his appearance in
Oshkosh, Dean said, "I shocked myself by
my answer" to the question about changing
the tone in Washington. OK, you would
think after all the controversy that has
swirled around Dean's public statements
that he would be a difficult guy to shock.
And while there was a self-congratulatory
tone to Dean's emphasis of his own candor,
he also expressed an underlying truth about
how he differs from John Kerry (news - web
sites), now the favorite for the nomination.

Dean, for all his flurry of now worthless endorsements by the likes of Al
Gore (news - web sites), has always been an outsider and a political
loner. Kerry represents a different political style, even though his views
on many policy issues are similar to those of Dean. Despite the
smile-button approach that the Democratic contenders are now
supposed to follow with one another, there is nothing wrong with Dean
continuing to fault Kerry for his go-along-with-Bush votes for the Iraq
(news - web sites) war resolution and the "No Child Left Behind"
education bill.

But in Oshkosh, as he has in the past, Dean pushed his rhetoric further
than a literal rendering of the facts would warrant. In his speech, Dean
emphasized that the $87 billion Congress provided for postwar military
activities and reconstruction would also cover the yearly cost of his
health care program. That's certainly a valid argument. But the way Dean
expressed it was to assert that the $87 billion was "the same amount
that this president - and that my competitors in the Democratic primary -
voted to spend on the Iraq war."

There was one big problem: Kerry and John Edwards (news - web sites),
the only other serious candidates still in the race, opposed the $87
billion measure. When I pressed Dean about this discrepancy, he said,
"They voted against it on the floor, I know, but they voted for the war that
made these expenditures inevitable." Since Edwards and Kerry had both
backed the 2002 Iraq war resolution, there was maybe a glimmer of
justification for Dean's argument. But it remains baffling why Dean, even
now when he is running in part to salvage his political legacy, insists on
playing transparent games with the facts.

Yet, even now, Dean brings to the fray unique virtues as a candidate. As
a doctor-politician, he displays a level of confidence and insight in talking
about the Democratic dream of universal health care that is difficult for
his rivals to match. Kerry and Edwards also have detailed plans to
provide medical coverage for the uninsured, but neither would dare advise
audiences, as Dean does, what over-the-counter remedy is virtually
identical to the pricey prescription drug Nexium.

But perhaps the most amazing thing about Dean is that he is still
smiling. Here is a candidate who was expected to romp to the
nomination little more than a month ago and is now battling to survive
beyond Tuesday's Wisconsin primary.

Dean insists that has gotten through what he calls "the difficult times" by
applying a stoical outlook that he absorbed from hockey, a sport he
loves and his teenage son plays. "Maybe you got a bad call from the
referee? So what?" the former front-runner asked rhetorically. "That's the
way it is. The game's over. I don't see the point in sitting around
complaining that if the media hadn't done this, if my opponents hadn't
said that."

For Dean, such regrets go under the heading of "woulda, coulda,
shoulda." Of course, it is different when the subject of the "shoulda" is
the presidency and not a game played on ice.

Walter Shapiro's column appears Monday, Wednesday and Friday during
the race for the Democratic presidential nomination. E-mail him at
wshapiro@usatoday.com



To: Mephisto who wrote (1090)2/16/2004 11:08:38 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 3079
 
Excerpt from Howard Dean Letter

As Governor of Vermont, I provided 99
percent of children and 92 percent of adults with health care,
and expanded prescription coverage for seniors. I will stand up to George Bush and say,
"I've provided Americans with health care. Why haven't you?"

As Governor, my educational policies lowered child abuse rates
and raised graduation rates. Teen pregnancy declined by 49%; childhood immunization went up
to 97%. I will stand up to George Bush and say,
"I've provided Americans with education. Why haven't you?"

When President Bush's unilateral war in Iraq was in the hands of Washington Democrats,
they went along with the polls and gave George W. Bush a blank
check. Next fall, I will stand up to George W. Bush and say,
"I knew that we shouldn't go to war with Iraq because it
was not an imminent threat to the United
States. Why didn't you?"


As Governor, I balanced eleven budgets in a row, because I know that
getting our fiscal house in order is needed for a strong economy. I will stand up to George
Bush and say, "I've balanced budgets. Why haven't you?"

As Governor, I cut unemployment in half. In the campaign next fall I will
stand up to George Bush and say,
"I've created new jobs. Why haven't you?"

Together, we have revolutionized political fundraising and changed the face
of American politics forever. Because of your support, I am the only one who can
stand up to George Bush and sincerely say, "My only special interests
are the American people. Who are yours?"


Mine is a record of getting things done, not just talking about getting things done.

The way to beat George W. Bush is with a candidate who has already stood
up to him - when it mattered, on issues that matter - like health care, investing in our
children, the Iraq war, the national debt, and jobs.

deanforamerica.com

Sincerely,
Gov. Howard Dean, M.D.