SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (43624)12/18/2003 8:40:22 PM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
<<China Cancels Africa's Debts>> While the west is not looking they encroach in there. Nice tactic!!!



To: TobagoJack who wrote (43624)12/19/2003 6:51:52 AM
From: smolejv@gmx.net  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hi Jay - I love one-liners. And I love substance. And nothing - space left? yes - nothing can beat the combination. DJ



To: TobagoJack who wrote (43624)12/19/2003 2:50:01 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
<<<China Cancels Africa's Debts>> ... for goodwill and access to resources, without lectures and double-speak ;0)>

China has US$. They have rembi thingy. They can use a LOT of resources and add a LOT of value and sell them for a LOT more US$.

Africa [whoever Africa is, but going with the stereotype] owes them a bunch of money, rembis or US$. Say it's US$ [probably is]. China says, "Forget about that money you owe us. Sell us 10 years of copper, coal, coffee, cobalt, chromium, [or whatever it is that Africa has], and we'll pay you such and such a price."

The price will be cheaper than what it'll be in two years. So China is buying a forward contract, knowing that their consumption will drive the prices up. It is a bet against the US$ and in favour of commodity prices [which they control because they are the ones with demand, which they control and intend to increase].

They get a deal on the resources now in exchange for correcting an excessively low price a couple of years ago, which is expressed in a debt which "Africa" can only pay when they sell more stuff.

So it's not really 'goodwill', though that comes with the trading. It's just eons-old buying, selling, colonization and empire in the initial stages.

The USA will observe the obverse of global trade, with themselves in reverse. The USA would do well from a NUN. Far better than a PNAC. The USA is to the NUN as Taiwan is to China and New Zealand is to Australia.

That's my theory for the day Jay.

Mqurice

PS: Lectures and double-speak will come later, inevitably.