Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Heinz Blasnik- Views You Can Use -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fedhead who wrote (3874)	12/18/2003 8:39:06 PM
From: Wyätt Gwyön	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 4905

How reliable is this Elliott wave stuff anyway it is extremely reliable in hindsight--history is written by the victors, after all. take ten analysts that have ten different interpretations of what this or that wave is. wait a couple years and see which one was right. that's the accurate monkey. the other nine monkeys will have complex variations on "the dog ate my homework" which excuse their inaccuracies. the only problem is that there's no persistence to this accuracy/inaccuracy. accuracy is just luck which is randomly distributed to the monkeys. imo one would have better luck tracking the Poisson distribution of Slothrop's conquests to predict future market movements. the fact that Prechter failed miserably in his earlier predictions may mean he's on the money now. after all, he's due for some random success. if he were ALWAYS wrong, he would be just as valuable as someone who is always right. such is to say i would not dismiss his current contentions out of hand. one thing he has going for him is that almost nobody else believes what he says can happen. five sigma events are unlikely to be a crowded trade. if people had true persistence with these systems, they'd have a "money machine". as such, they would guard their secrets and make free money instead of selling their pearls for a few kopeks to all comers.

To: fedhead who wrote (3874)	12/18/2003 8:41:17 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Respond to of 4905

Message 19611543 Not that I agree with Prechter at all, but he may be right on deflation (eventually).

To: fedhead who wrote (3874)	12/18/2003 8:53:30 PM
From: loantech	Respond to of 4905

< I have seen this wave guys always rationalize their mistakes with an alternate wave count. Interesting theory but not tradeable IMO.> They have more counts than the English gentry!

To: fedhead who wrote (3874)	12/18/2003 9:17:20 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4905

he's notorious for bad timing. but his fundimental arguement is worth noting.