SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: microhoogle! who wrote (513112)12/20/2003 8:12:28 AM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Well, for those who feel we SHOULDNT have gone into Iraq and taken out Saddam and his government, I would point out the SURPRISE ANNOUNCEMENT yesterday by Libya that they are going to give up their WMD and allow inspectors in. I feel that the pressure the USA has put on MiddleEastern potentates (sp?) has caused them to rethink the value of having WMD. Now, far as I am concerned our next target should by SYRIA. Perhaps it can be done diplomatically, but if not, we ought to eliminate THAT Terrorist nation once we have IRAQ on their feet. Libya looks as though it wants to reenter the world community, with Iraq and Syria I think that would pretty much wrap it up and cause the last remaining dangerous middle eastern nation (IRAN) to eliminate terrorists also. I am not including Saudi Arabia (although I realize that nation supports terrorists though their religious entities, as I actually believe the GOVERNMENT of SA is not themselves terroristic). jdn