SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bruno Cipolla who wrote (24375)12/19/2003 5:12:14 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Respond to of 60323
 
Bruno, you make a good argument that comparing write speeds may not necessarily be a valid indicator of whether one card is better or more suitable than another. However, Aus does have a point, and it is worth questioning why SNDK SD cards seem to be slower than others in the comparison.

I recall that older comparisons of compact flash cards showed that SanDisk cards also were slower, but more reliable in terms of total number of error free write and read operations. If a high speed card tends to lose some of its sectors faster than a slower card, many users will still choose the slower card.

Art



To: Bruno Cipolla who wrote (24375)12/19/2003 6:13:40 PM
From: Howard R. Hansen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60323
 
Just to make sure I understand your message are you using the convention that Mb means megabits and MB means megabytes?



To: Bruno Cipolla who wrote (24375)12/19/2003 6:55:08 PM
From: Ausdauer  Respond to of 60323
 
Bruno, I can't argue with your logic.

The proof will be card performance. If you get a wait light or a card error reading
then it will be certain that there is some kind of performance issue.

The Lexar COO stated a while back that some cards yielded errors when used in
certain digital cameras with higher resolution video capabilities. This
was due to an inability to keep up with data transfer rates.

You may be right. Perhaps this is all hype.

Aus