SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: goldworldnet who wrote (513378)12/20/2003 2:31:03 AM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769670
 
Time to put an end to BS conspiracy theories:

Yes Oswald did not act alone and RFK and ML King were probably murdered by somebody hiring wacko gunmen, but that aside let's all recognize reality instead of wild theories.

For instance, no Clinton never murdered anyone or anything nefarious like that. He just liked sex too much. So do a lot of guys. Otherwise he was a wildly successful president who brought hope and success to hundreds of millions.

No, Bush didn't know 9-11 was going to happen and allow it to. Though he was warned something might happen and did nothing.

Yes, the phony energy crisis was planned and colluded on by big energy forces who gave a lot of $$ to Bush but no GW himself didn't plan it, though who knows about Cheney? Never put anything past Cheney.

And no, Saddam was not even friends with Al Qaida, in fact he didn't get along with them at all.

"Conservatives nurture conspiracy theories of their own. The right-wing press ballyhooed a story in the Sunday Telegraph of London claiming that captured Iraqi documents proved Sept. 11 hijacker Mohamed Atta had visited Baghdad months before the attacks. This would vindicate the Bush administration's assertions of a longtime connection between Saddam and al-Qaeda. But Newsweek has posted an online story convincingly arguing that the documents cited by the British newspaper were almost certainly forgeries."

No Iraq was no an imminent threat but Bush did it anyway. Maybe some good will come from it, but at tremendous cost. It is simply the greatest un-planned gamble a president has ever made. It helps Bush sometimes politically but who knows what it will come to. Saddam was an easy boogey man but he still doesn't have anything to do with the war on terror except he's in the same neighborhood and was a menace with a lot of oil. Never forget the oil. The oil may be the only real reason for the invasion. No one will admit that of course. It is taboo to mention the #1 most obvious reason a Big Oil administration would choose Iraq to invade.