Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (20611)	12/20/2003 11:30:33 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793817

KH< By the way, does anyone find the lefts pre-occupation with the denial of rights to Jose Padilla(dirty bomber), kind of silly in light of FDR's concentration camps for Japanese Americans of which 99.9% were loyal american citizens. Ashcraft you bastard but FDR is still God. By the way, in spite of horror of the detention, i understand FDR's decision, particularly the notion that the racist, anti-asian sentiment particularly in California would have put them at risk to the local populations. I also am not going to cry for the 100 padillas detained, because one is wrongly jailed. This isnt an issue of crime--it is an issue of War. Mike

To: Lane3 who wrote (20611)	12/20/2003 1:15:03 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793817

I noticed that the two responses to my post seemed to doubt my veracity in reporting the incident. Sorry, that was not my intent at all. In the process, he reported that he was a liberal Democrat who had been selected by Bush to head the program. Yes, that does explain the unusual use of the words "liberal Democrat". A truly convincing, non-biased use of the label would be if Peter Jennings invited commentary from someone and described his political stance as "liberal Democrat", in the way he often describes the odd Republican commentator as "conservative Republican".