SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E who wrote (20702)12/20/2003 10:05:13 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794413
 
You don't seem to be able to make your point and let things go. Very necessary here. We are not going to change anybody's mind. I want viewpoints from the left. I just don't want them provoked into angry arguments. So relax and have fun. Speaking of having fun, this site will provide it. I expect one like it on the right once the final candidate is picked.

December 21, 2003 - New York Times
On the Web, an Amateur Audience Creates Anti-Bush Ads
By PHOEBE EATON

When the Web-based political group MoveOn.org announced a contest in October for homemade commercials challenging the Bush administration (the winner to be shown on television during the week of the State of the Union address) grass-roots America proved a willing and eager advertising agency.

Thirty-second spots poured in by the hundreds in e-mail attachments to MoveOn.org, which has already shown that the Internet can be a battering ram for political activism by organizing protests against the invasion of Iraq. Last week, the group posted 1,017 of the amateur commercials on a Web site bushin30seconds.org asking viewers to pick their favorites.

In the first hour of polling on Wednesday, more than 5,700 votes were logged. So many people visited the site that MoveOn, experiencing bandwidth problems, limited the curious to 20 ads a day.

Next month the top vote-getters will be shown to a panel of left-leaning celebrity judges including Moby, Michael Moore, Janeane Garofalo, Margaret Cho and Gus Van Sant, with one or more winning entries to be broadcast as paid advertisements in Washington, D.C., in potential swing states or perhaps nationally.

What the cascade of entries demonstrates is that the home-movie revolution made possible by inexpensive digital camcorders and off-the-shelf software has elevated the United States from merely being a nation of wedding videographers.

Even so, the production values of many spots are a bit shaky, and the content often overheated. "Bush Cheney Auto World," a typical entry, from Tracy Spaight, a high-school history teacher in Houston, posits an oily salesman whose motto is: "Where we always say what you want to hear." But a number of the ads are unexpectedly professional-looking, at least on a par with the burnished style and hard-hitting messages of political ads made by Madison Avenue pros or K Street consultants in untucked shirttails.

The amateur ad makers of the left are charged up about the country's dependence on fossil fuels, the plight of education and the $87.5 billion spending package for Iraq. They tabulate Mr. Bush's perceived deceptions. He is "Bushoccio," an inflatable Hot Air President Doll whose box bears the product warning: "Not designed for poor people. Not actually elected."

Contributors to the contest include recent graduates of the Kennedy School of Government, a teacher from Detroit, stand-up comics, amateur impressionists, a D.J. and more than a few self-styled rappers.

Sets and props have a quaintly home-grown provenance. Pies and cakes are used to illustrate budget and tax cuts. A pot on the verge of boiling over is Iraq. Water gurgling down a drain is "American Credibility." A toilet flushes away "Our Children's Future," played in another ad by a fragile U.S. Grade A egg.

Movies and TV shows are the ad makers' grist. "I'm concerned, George, I'm concerned about how you've dealt with the economy," drones a computer in a spot titled "2004: A Political Odyssey."

Christopher Fink, an independent filmmaker in California, used his ranch-style house in the San Fernando Valley as a set and recruited his sister as cinematographer after she made an accomplished video of his wife's baby shower.

In the spot titled "If Parents Acted Like Bush," Mr. Fink plays the president as a cad who beds down with special interests. His car pulls away from the house in the morning, leaving his teenage daughter (Mr. Fink's niece) to find her own way to school. He buys a motorcycle and tells the Terminator-face biker that his daughter will pay for it.

Then she walks in on him in his bedroom, snuggling with a blonde who isn't her mother. "It's O.K.," he cries, "she's rich!"

And how much did the spot cost? "Including catering? That was most of the budget — the doughnuts," Mr. Fink said. "It couldn't have cost me more than 50 bucks."

Donnie Deutsch, a prominent New York advertising executive who worked on the campaign of Bill Clinton in 1992, looked at a sample of the MoveOn ads last week and was impressed. "I thought some of it was very fresh and interesting — obviously amateurish in some of its creative license — but certainly very creative in its thinking," he said.

However, Mike Murphy, a Republican strategist who worked on Arnold Schwarzenegger's campaign for governor of California, was more dismissive. "I'd say a lot of this looks like MoveOn self-promotion," he said in a message sent, appropriately enough, by e-mail over his BlackBerry. "Having an insult-the-president home-movie contest is not smart politics."

Through its Voter Fund, which solicits donations online, in part from Web surfers who must register to view the anti-Bush ads, MoveOn aims to raise about $15 million for advertising in battleground states to unseat Mr. Bush, said Eli Pariser, who oversees the group's fund-raising.

In addition to the amateur ads, MoveOn has a professional agency on retainer. But Mr. Pariser said he was so pleased with the ads that have rolled in that MoveOn may approach its 1.7 million members in this country and say, "Here are 10 great ads, and we want to run all of them."

It would not be the first time the group has proven the power of the Internet for political activism. Founded five years ago to oppose the impeachment of President Bill Clinton, MoveOn.org became a catalyst for demonstrations earlier this year, and subsequently raised more than $7 million from 133,000 donors to oppose Mr. Bush's policies. Last month two billionaire philanthropists, George Soros and Peter B. Lewis, announced they would match contributions to the group up to $5 million between them.

The content of the MoveOn ads is circumscribed by the campaign finance reforms of the McCain-Feingold Law, upheld earlier this month by the Supreme Court. While prohibiting soft-money donations to political parties, the law allows donations to flow to independent groups like MoveOn as long they run only informational ads and do not specifically endorse a candidate.

Thus MoveOn's call for submissions was careful to solicit ads that would help voters "understand the truth about George Bush." No ads supporting the president's policies were sent in, contest organizers noted. They also disqualified about 100 submissions, including some for reasons of taste. A spot showing a frog dropped into boiling water, a metaphor for "how the administration is turning up the heat in this country," according to its director, was deemed unsuitable for television.

Still, plenty of the ads that made the cut exhibit the inflamed passions of street rallies. The scenarios are sometimes closer to angry guerrilla theater than witty "Saturday Night Live" spoofs. A man fills his gas tank, then shoots the cashier instead of paying. "If you wouldn't tolerate this from a normal citizen," the screen reads, "why would you from your president?"

"Follow the Leader" compares Mr. Bush to a schoolyard bully who shoots a schoolmate in the back. "Connect the Dots" maintains that Mr. Bush "has established links to known terrorist organizations." Still another commercial claims he has "ties to the Bin Laden family."

Larry McCarthy, a Republican strategist who in 1988 helped produce a notorious television ad using a convicted murderer, Willie Horton, to suggest that the Democratic nominee, Gov. Michael S. Dukakis, was soft on crime, has not seen the MoveOn ads, but he admired the idea.

"It's certainly proof of the march of technology, letting everybody and anybody be an ad maker," he said.

"As a fund-raiser gimmick, I think it's pretty good," he continued. "I wouldn't be surprised if somebody on the Republican side decided that there's just as much or more fodder on Howard Dean, so why don't you let those little Republicans with camcorders have a go at it too?"

nytimes.com



To: E who wrote (20702)12/20/2003 10:09:39 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794413
 
A case of retraction on the left. If we held people to their positions, nobody would ever get elected! :>)

December 21, 2003 New York Times
Dean Opposes Privatizing Public Services but Issue Is Thorny
By JODI WILGOREN

DUBUQUE, Iowa, Dec. 20 — Howard Dean has repeatedly declared his blanket opposition to privatization of public services during his campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination, though as governor of Vermont he at times went on record supporting privatization.

On Friday, when a voter asked his thoughts on private prisons, Dr. Dean volunteered a sweeping statement: "I oppose privatization of public services."

He told the woman, a corrections worker in Burlington, Iowa, that "private prisons do a worse job than public prisons."

Then he added, "The answer to your direct question is: I oppose privatization of public services."

But in a 1998 letter to a constituent concerned about the privatization of a government-run day care center, Dr. Dean wrote, "Over all, I have found that private contractors can perform the same service for less money while maintaining a high level of quality."

He wrote that he could not intervene in the case but added that Vermont "relies on the outsourcing of certain state functions in order to save taxpayers money."

Five years earlier, Dr. Dean wrote to Leon E. Panetta in the Clinton White House to lobby against the repeal of an executive order paving the way for government outsourcing. "Privatization, undertaken with fairness and carefully monitored, can deliver better public services at lower costs," he said in that letter.

Jay Carson, a campaign spokesman, said Dr. Dean told him on Saturday that the 1993 letter to Mr. Panetta and the 1998 constituent letter were written by aides and did not reflect his thinking. Mr. Carson said the former governor could not recall privatizing any jobs in Vermont.

But union leaders said contracting by the state increased when Dr. Dean, in 1995, capped the state workforce at 7,000 to keep the budget balanced. In 1999, as a commission appointed by Dr. Dean looked into the role of outsourcing in the state, his administration secretary, Kathleen Hoyt, was quoted by The Burlington Free Press as saying of contracting, "Sometimes it's the most sensible thing that can be done."

The comments on privatization during the 1990's jibe with Dr. Dean's fiscally conservative reign in Vermont, while the broad denunciation of privatization reflects the more liberal positions he has taken during the presidential campaign, in part to woo labor.

His answer in Burlington, Iowa, on Friday echoed a line from his announcement speech in June in Burlington, Vt.: "The tax cuts are designed to destroy Social Security, Medicare, our public schools and our public services through starvation and privatization."

Several of Dr. Dean's rivals for the Democratic nomination have asserted that he has moved to the left on issues like trade, government entitlements and tax policy to appeal to voters in primaries. Opponents tried to use the privatization issue against him during the fierce lobbying for union endorsements in the fall, particularly the endorsement by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, whose support Dr. Dean eventually won.

James P. Hoffa, the president of the Teamsters union and a supporter of a rival candidate, Representative Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri, wrote to the president of the federation, Gerald W. McEntee, two weeks ago, criticizing Dr. Dean's record on privatization.

On that same December day, the president of the Vermont State Employees Association wrote to his members asking them to vote for Dr. Dean for president. The letter acknowledged that the union had had disputes with him but cited his support for legislation limiting privatization.

In a November letter to Mr. McEntee, Dr. Dean pointed to the same bills, which allowed Vermont employees to present alternatives before state agencies could contract out, and said privatization had proved inefficient.

"Frequently, taxpayers end up paying more and getting less while private interests profit at public expense," he wrote. "My position is clear: I am opposed to the privatization of public services at the local, state and federal level."

The privatization question on Friday was typical of questions — about Medicare, trade, guns, even chiropractic — that Dr. Dean fielded in a two-day swing through Iowa, all stemming from negative advertisements or mailers about him circulated by other candidates and interest groups.

"To hear these guys talk, I'm against Nafta, I have an AK-47 under my pillow, I'm married to Osama bin Laden — oh, and I'm against Israel," he joked at a pancake breakfast on Saturday at a middle school in Clinton. "Do not believe this nonsense."

nytimes.com