Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: unclewest who wrote (20724)	12/21/2003 5:47:59 AM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 793684

The deceased former fuerher and Reich Chancellor": According to a column in The Sun (U.K.) (not exactly an impartial source, it seems, but I have no reason to doubt the factual allegations), BARMY BBC bosses have banned reporters from calling tyrant Saddam Hussein a former dictator. Instead, staff must refer to the barbaric mass murderer as “the deposed former President”. The astonishing edict was seized on by MPs last night as more proof of a Left-wing bias inside the BBC against the Iraqi war. . . . Labour MP Ann Clwyd, who chairs the Indict group which has dossiers on the crimes of Saddam, his sons and henchmen, was astounded at the BBC’s stance. She said: “It’s frankly ridiculous. Saddam Hussein is a despot, a murderer and a torturer. He will have to answer charges of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.” . . . The BBC said the email spelling out the instruction was sent to reporters on its online website, which serves a global audience. A spokeswoman said: “This was reiterating existing guidelines to remind BBC News Online journalists of the need to use neutral language.” Later she said the ban on calling Saddam a dictator did not apply to domestic services. Seriously, there really isn't that much of a difference between that and a mandate that journalists say "the deceased former fuerher and Reich Chancellor." I'm not fond of promiscuous comparisons to Nazism, but the analogy here seems quite apt. volokh.com

To: unclewest who wrote (20724)	12/21/2003 5:50:50 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793684

Polygamist Family Just Wants to Be Normal By Scott Ott The family sits around the Christmas tree. The grownups sip hot cocoa. The children giggle as they shake wrapped gifts trying to guess the contents. It's a Norman Rockwell, home and hearth, God-Bless-America moment. But when the Masterson family ventures into public, they're not treated like full citizens. Archaic laws, religious bigotry and misguided morality often leave them feeling shunned -- strangers in their own land. What they see as a loving family, the government calls criminal. That's because Bob Masterson is a polygamist. He shares his spacious suburban home with six wives, and their 23 children. The Mastersons are at the center of a court battle which they hope will grant polygamists the same rights that normal, heterosexual, monogamous married couples have. The Masterson's case comes as the eyes of the nation are on New Jersey, where seven homosexual couples are suing for the right to marry. "We are good citizens, we pay our taxes and we are caring parents — but we don't have the same equality as other Americans," Mr. Masterson said. "We're tired of having to explain our relationship." Although it may seem like a pipe dream, given America's primitive, provincial culture, the Mastersons yearn for the day when they can enjoy the little privileges other married people take for granted. "Someday," Mr. Masterson said, "I want to have my checks imprinted with 'Bob and Lorraine, Cindy, Jennifer, Lucy, Abigail and Barbara Masterson'. Is that too much to ask? I look forward to the day when I can check the 'Married, filing jointly' box on the IRS 1040, and there are enough signature lines for all of us. It's little things like that." Although it doesn't seem much to ask, Mr. Masterson knows that it will take a tectonic shift in American culture. "Like I keep telling the old ladies, it's going to take baby steps," he said. "It will start with the TV sitcoms, where you'll begin to see fun-loving polygamist characters. Then someone will do a show like 'Polygamist Eye for the Monogamous Guy'." Still, Mr. Masterson and his wives know that fully-legal polygamist marriage is a long way off. "Frankly," he said, "Right now, we'd settle for being treated under the law like ordinary Vermont lesbians." If you enjoyed this satire by Scott Ott, you can read more of his work at Scrappleface.