SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (7929)12/21/2003 11:31:47 AM
From: Glenn Petersen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10965
 
The mechanics for conducting elections in the U.S. is often flawed. This is a problem that needs to be addressed at the state and local level. Approximately 7% of the votes in Chicago during the 2000 election were not counted. The last time I looked, Chicago was being run by the brother of Bill Daley.

High Number of Voting Irregularities Leads to Federal Lawsuit

Challenging Constitutionality of Illinois Election Process


216.239.37.104

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Thursday, January 11, 2001

CHICAGO -- The American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois today asked a federal judge to protect "the fundamental right to vote" for all persons, saying that inequalities, highlighted by the use of the error-ridden punch card voting system in many areas of the state, resulted in a disproportionate number of ballots from precincts with high racial minority populations going uncounted in the recent election.

"The right to vote is the most fundamental right in our democracy," said Harvey Grossman, Legal Director for the ACLU of Illinois. "Every other privilege of citizenship flows from that right."

Today's challenge to the Illinois election system for violating the Voting Rights Act, as well as the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, follows the release of official results in Chicago demonstrating that more than 70,000 (less than seven percent) legally cast ballots were not counted.

The lawsuit filed today on behalf of three African Americans who reside and vote in Chicago is directed against the State Board of Elections, the state body responsible for overseeing all elections in the State of Illinois, and the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners.

"The state has an obligation to insure that all voters are treated equally," Grossman said. "In Illinois, voters in punch card districts, and African Americans in particular, are subjected to a substantially higher risk than other voters of not having their vote counted. The system must be fixed."

The lawsuit asks the Chicago federal court to enter a permanent injunction prohibiting the State Board of Elections and the Chicago Board of Election from conducting future elections using the present punch card system and without ensuring that all counties have the authority to use - and implement - systems that notify voters of ballot errors while those errors can still be corrected.

In Illinois, the punch card voting systems operating in some voting districts - the subject of recent litigation in the states of Florida and Georgia - have substantially higher error rates in recording, counting and tabulating votes when compared to optical scanning voting systems.

The percentage of ballots cast and not counted is significantly higher in precincts predominantly populated by African Americans. An analysis of election results appearing in the December 27, 2000 edition of the Washington Post found that the racial composition of voting precincts in Chicago dramatically affected the percentage of votes disqualified.

The Washington Post analysis found that in those Cook County precincts where the population was comprised of less than 30 percent persons of color, the percentage of uncounted ballots averaged just 4.9 percent. In those precincts where racial minorities comprised more than 90 percent of the voting population, the percentage of uncounted ballots exceeds nine percent.

"It is not a mere coincidence that the rate of uncounted votes increases in minority communities," said Mr. Timuel Black, a Chicago resident and a lead plaintiff in the lawsuit. "It appears that persons of color and the poor are systematically disenfranchised under the current voting process."

Today's lawsuit also charges that the state legislature possesses the ability to correct the inequities in the state election law, but failed to take steps to ensure that African Americans have an equal right to vote.

State law allows counties that employ optically scanned ballots to use technology that notifies voters of a ballot error. These systems make certain that a vote is valid before the voter leaves a local polling location. If a problem occurs with the ballot, the voter can request a replacement and vote again before the ballot is submitted to election officials.

The use of these systems for notifying voters of ballot errors is highly effective, as proved in DeKalb and McHenry Counties, both of which use such systems to assist their voters. The ballot disqualification rate in those counties in the 2000 general election was less than one-half of one percent.

The punch card ballot systems used in Chicago and many other counties across the State of Illinois are technologically capable of notifying voters of errors. Current state law, however, does not allow this feature to be used on punch card systems, even while specifically allowing voter error notification with optical scanning voting systems.

Efforts to correct this disparity in law have been introduced in the Illinois General Assembly. The Illinois House twice approved the legislation allowing the use of such systems. City of Chicago officials already have purchased the necessary equipment and software to make it possible to notify voters of any ballot errors. However, the Illinois State Senate failed to hold a vote on the legislation on either occasion. Even after the results of the 2000 election became public, one state senate spokesperson suggested there was no "rush" to address the legislation.

"I cherish the right to vote," said Vinni Hall, the third named plaintiff in the lawsuit. "I always have viewed voting as the most important duty I perform as a citizen. Black people have struggled for the right to vote and it should not be denied whether by overt vices like poll taxes, or through less obvious devices like inaccurate voting systems or procedures allowing only some voters to correct errors in their ballots."

Attorneys for the plaintiffs include Harvey Grossman, Pamela Sumners and Adam Schwartz of the ACLU of Illinois, Laughlin McDonald of the National American Civil Liberties Union Voting Rights Project, William T. Barker of the Chicago law firm Sonneschein, Nath and Rosenthal and Ellen Douglass of Chicago.

To view releases on litigation from the 2000 presidential election in the states of Georgia and Florida, where the inadequacy of punch card voting systems is also being challenged, go to archive.aclu.org/news/2001/n010501a.html and archive.aclu.org/news/2001/n011001b.html.

The legal complaint is online at archive.aclu.org



To: American Spirit who wrote (7929)12/21/2003 11:56:20 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 10965
 
Clark finally making headway

boston.com

By Scot Lehigh
The Boston Globe
12/19/2003

CONCORD, N.H.

DURING A WEEK that was everything a Republican president could hope for, it was the kind of day that, of the Democrats, only Wesley Clark could have.


With the capture of Saddam Hussein pushing George W. Bush's polling numbers up (at least temporarily) from competitive to formidable, the former supreme allied commander returned from testifying at the war-crimes trial of Slobodan Milosevic, the man whose forces he ran out of Kosovo, to spend Wednesday laying out his ideas for trying the deposed Iraqi dictator.

Talk of your transition from testimony to testimonials.

First human-rights advocate Samantha Power praised Clark for helping reverse a long history of US inaction in the face of genocide. "That changed in the mid-1990s, and it changed in large measure because General Clark rose through the ranks of the American military," she told the audience at the Franklin Pierce Law Center.

Then Edita Tahiri, an Albanian Kosovar, offered her own stunning encomium. "General Clark," she said, "is the savior of my nation, the Albanians of Kosovo. He is the savior of my personal life."

All that underscored the central message of Clark's campaign: In the general, Democrats have a man who has actually conducted the sort of effective, multilateral foreign policy their party celebrates.

But just in case anyone missed that message, Clark drove the point home. Predicting that Bush would question the national-security credentials and resolution of the Democrats, he said: "Let me tell you what happens if he tries to do that. I'll put my 34 years of defending the United States of America and the results that I and my teammates in the United States Armed Forces achieved against his three years of failed policies, any day."

To be sure, there were awkward moments; the capture of Saddam presents both the Democratic candidates and the Republican president with uncomfortable incongruities in their own positions. Would Bush have invaded Iraq if he had known that months of searching would turn up none of the predicted weapons of mass destruction? Asked, in an ABC interview that aired Tuesday, about the failure to find WMD, the president took shelter in a repeated -- and animated -- insistence that Saddam had presented a threat to the United States.

For antiwar Democrats, the parallel question is this: Under their policies, wouldn't the murderous dictator be in power today rather than in prison? Post-capture politics have already occasioned another stumble by Democratic front-runner Howard Dean, who asserted that apprehending Saddam hasn't made America safer, a conclusion roundly criticized by his primary rivals.

For his part, the general tried to avoid a misstep with a sidestep. When a reporter asked whether, given Clark's opposition to the war, Saddam would still be in power if the general were president, Clark said he "would have gone after Saddam Hussein in a different way and with different priorities," and with UN aprroval. In an interview afterward, Clark told the Globe that the options could have ranged from more robust inspections to human-rights monitors to multilateral military action.

"We could have encroached on Saddam bit by bit, then we could have brought him down, at a different time in a different way," he said. "We could have put human-rights inspectors in there. We could have demanded that they reform their practices."

That seems unlikely, but such are the feints and evasions of presidential politics.

Still, despite that tap-dance, what is clear is that Clark, after an awkward entrance into the race, has found his footing.

He discusses foreign affairs with a confidence and fluidity that only US Senator John Kerry matches, offering up a stream of thoughtful proposals. Nor does he seem out of his element talking about domestic policy.

As the campaign heads into the holiday season, Clark can look forward to the strong possibility of a Granite State showing that enhances his candidacy. And, after that, a route to more promising ground in the Feb. 3 round of primaries in the South and West. Meanwhile, his campaign aides predict fourth-quarter fund-raising of $10 million, which, if realized, would underscore how serious his effort has become.

It's no wonder, then, that in a week when a cloud of depression has overspread the Democratic field, Clark and his team see a silver lining.

Scot Lehigh's e-mail address is lehigh@globe.com.

© Copyright 2003 Globe Newspaper Company.