SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: hank2010 who wrote (25824)12/21/2003 4:58:15 PM
From: Claude Cormier  Respond to of 39344
 
Hank2010,

I knew that galena was a sulfide and not leachable and agree that cost are higher with the conventional mill. Also knows that there is a drawback because of the lead which has implied heavy penalties at most smelters.

But I am not sure that a large operation could not see the day in Argentina.

But yes there are other opportunities that looks much better.



To: hank2010 who wrote (25824)12/21/2003 5:33:35 PM
From: Michael Bidder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 39344
 
hank,

<<<<<There are a whole lot of opportunities out there. Why take the risk on this one? >>>>>>>

Hank you are in a growing asset if the core comes back positive.



To: hank2010 who wrote (25824)12/21/2003 6:20:28 PM
From: Condor  Respond to of 39344
 
Why take the risk on this one?

That is the most sensible comment made on this play IMO.

Might as well play roulette and put $ xxxxx on evens. Makes absolutely no sense as an investment and is purely gambling.

And we have a front row seat to watch this survivor reality game.

(shaking head)

Cheers

C



To: hank2010 who wrote (25824)12/22/2003 2:31:44 AM
From: Michael Bidder  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 39344
 
There are a whole lot of opportunities out there.>>

Name one.