Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (121959)	12/23/2003 8:46:26 AM
From: John Carragher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

wonder if Lynch ever called the lawyer who went to troops to save her?

To: Neocon who wrote (121959)	12/23/2003 12:07:26 PM
From: Sam	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

It is interesting that this version makes more sense to you. It builds a theory on very little.... It is amazing to me that you apparently find it so easy to go to war. On nothing. There was no "imminent threat." There wasn't even a particularly grave danger, not from Saddam. Certainly not one that required immediate action, as Bush claimed. We went to war in Iraq because the Republicans wanted to divert attention from the economy with this war in '02, and wanted an easier target than "Al Qaeda" in Iraq for '04. Gotta hand to him and Rove, their political strategy has worked quite well so far.