SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (122005)12/23/2003 10:30:43 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
Yeah... I read that article on Zinni today... Buried in the "Style Section" of the Washington Post.

But the article on Wolfowitz which overshadowed it was even more interesting.

washingtonpost.com

My heartburn with the Zinni article is not with the substance of his criticism in the post-war planning and his own contingency plan for occupying Iraq, "Desert Crossing", but that he's failed to acknowledge or understand the strategic trends that have created the situation.

His answer was to maintain the status quo in containing Iraq, perpetuating the failed policy which was starving the Iraqi people, increasing resentment among the Arabs, being undercut by "allies", and stifling any kind of major economic change in the region.

But it ignores the fact that Bin Laden was created out of that effort to contain Iraq, primarily due to the basing of US forces in Saudi Arabia.

But I certainly echo many of his criticisms for the post-Iraq operations.

Hawk



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (122005)12/24/2003 11:02:01 AM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
A few hundred billion dollars and a large chunk of our military could have been put to far better use -- there was zero need to invade Iraq at this point in time.