SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mephisto who wrote (7984)12/24/2003 10:38:28 AM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10965
 
I don't know about you, but I wouldn't board a commercial air craft.

I can't figure out how the Bushies can get away with all this fear mongering. It's got to be really bad for airline profits. You'd think they'd be screaming for better solutions.

They just announced that LAX is now not accepting curbside passengers. Too weird. I think it is all just overdone. For media effect. To try to scare the wits out of the public and keep 'em in line.



To: Mephisto who wrote (7984)12/24/2003 2:15:14 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10965
 
IOWA GOVERNOR CONSTRUCTS THE PERFECT CANDIDATE

story.news.yahoo.com



To: Mephisto who wrote (7984)12/25/2003 5:45:22 AM
From: Dale Baker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10965
 
Getting on a plane is infinitely safer than getting in your car, and always will be. If you spent the next month trying to get blown up in a terrorist-stricken airline, you wouldn't succeed.

By not boarding any aircraft, however, you just let the terrorists win without firing a shot.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News