SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Fred Levine who wrote (45366)12/24/2003 12:19:55 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 50167
 
Fred,

I agree with you 100%. The attacks on Clark are just some of Karl Rove's dirty tricks. Unfortunately there are too many small minded individuals who fail to think for themselves who will be suckered into the spin. I know that even I have had my skepticism about Clark piqued by the extensive negative press he is receiving. What I discovered after suitable due diligence is that the accusers seem to be ideologically motivated to lie.

Rove is the evil man in this equation. Not Clark, not Dean, and not even Bush, who is mean-spirited enough to let Rove spin his disinformation web, but not smart enough for the really sinister plots that Rove is a genius at. If the man would only give up on being Satan's field marshal, he might amount to something in his life. (Just kidding, I love satirizing these putzes' religious imagery that they use for mind control, while cynically mocking the fools they can manipulate and deceive.)

Character assassination? No better target for that this year than the creep behind the President, Karl Rove.



To: Fred Levine who wrote (45366)12/24/2003 2:17:14 PM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 50167
 
<When I read that leftists and liberal always try to appease, I think of Harry Truman in Korea and Japan, of Kennedy in Cuba and Berlin, and Clinton in the Balkans-->

And why not Bush in Afghanistan and Iraq for a just cause, if 'Clark' meeting with the bunch of Serb thugs and war criminals is diplomatic effort, I call it nothing but a betrayal of the 'blood of innocents' and that is exactly how appeasement is defined. Name calling is derogatory, but the way Bush is treated on this thread by some of these loonies is absurd and I would appreciate if you can have some concern on that too, all these hard core loonies gathering on my thread only present to me an opportunity to see that how blind folded they are in hatred of present administration and how shallow they, most of them have been wrong all along since I know them, some said Iraq would be a Vietnam, than claimed the war will cost thousands of casualties and the litany of claims have never stopped, the world has moved forward and their ideas have been deposed to thrash of history.

Bush has helped change the dynamics of global politics a lot, Kennedy in Bays of pig was a disaster but lets not talk about it, in Cuba he gave up on Turkish Missiles in a secret deal, so appeasement was part of Cuban crisis nothing bad in that but the issue here is that Clark was meeting people who had genocidal crimes on hand, in Srebrenica 7500 man and children were eliminated and both of the Serbs were declared war criminals and Boston Globe has written a great story which I have just reproduced, I would advise you to target your real post to the author the link is highlighted in my post. Best regards Ike