Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: abstract who wrote (60173)	12/24/2003 6:38:29 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

"(BTW, some of us think the post that you've taken such offence at was actually complimentary.)" Comparing me to a wacko gangster who quotes the bible & blithely slaughters people is not being complimentary IMO. Inappropriately implying that I have an inflexible POV is not complimentary at all. Falsely alluding that I have "no room for another opinion" is not complimentary.

To: abstract who wrote (60173)	12/24/2003 6:52:35 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

"So much for humility and latitude. You have returned to blithely slaughtering, striking down upon me with great vengeance and furious anger. Is that specific enough?" Let's look at the facts. You made this false assertion in response to a factually accurate description of our discussion thus far. Where is my alleged "great vengeance and furious anger"? Meanwhile, throughout this discussion, you've personally attacked me, impugned my reputation more than once & used mean spirited & vitriolic verbiage regarding my rebuttals, ET AL. And what you failed to add in that statement is that I backed up my POV with factually accurate evidence. IOW, if the shoe fits...... you is what you is. There's no, "great vengeance and furious anger" in providing an accurate description of your responses.