SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rat dog micro-cap picks... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: D_I_R_T who wrote (16698)12/25/2003 10:26:58 AM
From: Bucky Katt  Respond to of 48461
 
The following article is recommended reading, it cuts to the bone on a few things, agree with it or not, the reality is this is the world we have before US>

Is it safe yet? The Saddam illusion


Has the capture of Saddam Hussein made the U.S. safer? Or was Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean correct when he said it hasn't?

Dean seems to have paid a political price for his contrarian opinion. But I think his assessment was correct. In fact, nabbing the former Iraqi leader is likely to make us less safe; it will increase the allure of the Islamist radicals who have declared war on the U.S.

Along with Syria, Iraq was a secular bulwark against the religious fundamentalism spreading in the area. One of the reasons the U.S. supported Hussein in the 1980s was his robust resistance to the Islamic evangelism of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini's Iran. The U.S. assisted Iraq in its eight-year war against the neighboring Islamic republic because it considered Khomeini's jihad a greater threat than Hussein's Baathist pan-Arabism.

Hussein invaded the newly minted Islamic state in 1980 with the closeted support of the U.S. and other Persian Gulf states threatened by Iran's Shiite Islamic zealots. He cracked down brutally on some Shiite communities in Iraq as if they were Iranian agents--and some were. The Kurds also had aligned themselves with Iran and provoked Hussein to mount his infamous gas attacks on the Kurds that killed thousands in 1988. He already had used chemical weapons on Iranians, including the first battlefield use of nerve gas.

Hussein's cruelest policies and most notable massacres were motivated primarily by the war with Iran, but it was his determination to maintain Iraq's secular character that accounted for his hard-line policies against religious activists. It also marked him as an "infidel" to jihadist groups like Al Qaeda. In fact, the same people who declared war on the U.S. also counted Hussein as an enemy.

His ouster and public humiliation helps make their point that only an Islamic jihad can rebuff "crusading imperialists." In this sense, Hussein's "spider-hole" arrest serves their cause much more than ours.

The U.S. invasion of secular Iraq already had ignited a process of radicalization among Muslim youth. According to an Oct. 16 story in the British newspaper The Guardian, a study by the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies has concluded that "the war on Iraq has swollen the ranks of Al Qaeda and `galvanized its will' by increasing radical passions among Muslims." As reported in The New York Times on Oct. 12, "two decades after Syria ruthlessly uprooted militant Islam, killing an estimated 10,000 people, the most secular of Arab states is experiencing a dramatic religious resurgence." This rise in religious passion is apparent throughout the region and is not intrinsically negative; but in the current historical context, it is likely to feed the fervor of jihadists. What's more, it makes the creation of the kind of secular governments U.S. policymakers think are necessary for democracy (and free trade) to flourish less likely. In much of the Islamic world, the word "secular" has become a curse.

There is a double irony here. During the 10 years of the Soviet Union's occupation of Afghanistan, from 1979 to 1989, the U.S. spent billions of dollars galvanizing an Islamic religious force to fight those "godless" communists. "The Afghan mujahedeen [warriors of God] were to become the U.S.-based, anti-Soviet shock troops," wrote Pakistani journalist Ahmed Rashid in his book "Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia." And when Soviet troops finally left Afghanistan in 1989, there emerged "a second generation of mujahedeen who called themselves Taliban [or the students of Islam]."

Osama bin Laden was an Arab member of that multi-ethnic anti-Soviet force and his faction eventually morphed into Al Qaeda, according to international journalist Jane Corbin's book "Al Qaeda: In Search of the Terror Network that Threatens the World."

The religious zealotry we encouraged and financed has come back to bite us.

And here's the double irony: We've also alienated the secular forces in the region that provided some indigenous resistance to the gusting winds of Islamist radicalism. Whatever else can be said about Hussein's autocratic regime, there is little argument that the Iraqi Baathists initially used the nation's oil wealth to create a modern secular society with a large and literate middle class. Iraq was one of the few Arab countries where women were a large and important segment of the work force.

But we have humiliated Iraq's Baathists and many within the Bush administration now are aiming bellicose rhetoric at Syria, that other Baathist bastion of secularism.

Bashing Baath leadership also plays well among jihadists. "Islam is proving appealing through much of the Arab world, including Syria, as a means to protest corrupt, incompetent and oppressive governments," wrote Neil MacFarquhar in the Oct. 12 Times piece. "The widespread sense that the faith is being singled out for attack by Washington has invigorated that appeal, at a time when the violence fomented by radicals had tarnished political Islam."

By conflating Hussein's secular tyranny with Islamist radicalism, the Bush administration's blunt, obtuse militarism has made America less safe. Rather than bash Dean for his views on Hussein's capture, Democratic candidates would be better served endorsing his critique.


By Salim Muwakkil, a Chicago journalist and a senior editor at In These Times

December 24, 2003

chicagotribune.com



To: D_I_R_T who wrote (16698)12/25/2003 11:51:38 AM
From: paret  Respond to of 48461
 
10 technologies to watch in 2004
Business 2.0 / CNN by David Pescovitz

(Business 2.0) --No, they're not quite ready for prime time. But in the year ahead, these promising innovations could start to hit the marketplace.

Home networking
Ultra-wideband: Imagine a television that can wirelessly send three different programs to separate monitors. Low-power, low-cost, and with roughly 45 times the data transmission speed of run-of-the-mill Wi-Fi, this wireless technology is finally ready to debut in the living room.

Supply chain
RFID: While they've been talked about a lot, radio frequency identification tags have yet to appear in a big way in the supply chain. Wal-Mart is making it happen: All its suppliers must use the tags for pallets and cases of merchandise by 2005.

Wireless broadband
802.16: WiMax enables wireless networks to extend as far as 30 miles and transfer data, voice, and video at faster speeds than cable or DSL. It's perfect for ISPs that want to expand into sparsely populated areas, where the cost of bringing in DSL or cable wiring is too high.

Energy
Micro fuel cells: Japan's largest wireless phone carrier, NTT DoCoMo, plans to introduce cell phones powered by miniature fuel cells -- which run on hydrogen or methanol -- late next year. Look for them to also show up as expensive add-ons for high-end laptops.

Household products
Gecko tape: Lizards climb walls using the mechanical adhesive force of millions of tiny hairs on their feet. A synthetic version of those microscopic hairs allows gecko tape, developed at England's University of Manchester, to stick to almost any surface without glue. Applications include gloves that allow a person to climb a glass wall, the ability to move computer chips in a vacuum, and new bandages.

Software
Antispam software (that works): If you've tried filters, whitelists, and blacklists, chances are you still receive plenty of junk e-mail. "Challenge/response" technology may be the answer; it requires senders to manually verify their identity before e-mail is passed along to the intended recipient.

Consumer electronics
OLEDs: Organic light-emitting diodes are brighter and use less power than normal light-emitting diodes. (They rely on carbon with nitrogen, oxygen, and hydrogen elements -- thus, the "organic" tag.) They're perfect for screens on cell phones, digital cameras, and camcorders, and even for a new crop of affordable flat-panel monitors.

Lighting
LED lightbulbs: LEDs will outrun obsolescence by moving into the home. Philips is already pushing its Luxeon line of LED lightbulbs, which can last 10 to 50 times as long as incandescent bulbs while consuming 80 percent less energy.

Computer memory
MRAM: Magnetoresistive random access memory is (in theory, anyway) more than 1,000 times faster than the fastest current nonvolatile flash memory and nearly 10 times faster than DRAM. "Nonvolatile" means it retains memory when the power is off. Add in its low power consumption, and it's perfect for use in an upcoming crop of computers and cell phones.

Medicine
Bioinformatics: Researchers, such as those at IBM Life Sciences, are finally getting a handle on building complex protein models to aid in drug discovery. The new, computationally accurate models mean that potential drugs can be identified more quickly and stand a better chance of working.



To: D_I_R_T who wrote (16698)12/27/2003 5:46:20 AM
From: paret  Respond to of 48461
 
Mad-cow quarantine grows; herds face slaughter

By Jonathan Martin and Ray Rivera
Seattle Times staff reporters

Saturday, December 27, 2003

An intense investigation into the family tree of the nation's first mad-cow case could lead to a quick death for hundreds, and possibly thousands, of Central Washington cows.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) expanded its quarantine of Washington cattle yesterday after tracing the newborn calf of the infected cow to a Sunnyside, Yakima County, ranch. Because the calf didn't have an identifying ear tag, federal protocols call for more than 400 calves under 30 days old to be killed and tested for the disease, said Linda Waring, spokeswoman for the state Department of Agriculture.

A second offspring remains at the same dairy farm that was home to the infected cow, where 4,000 cows are quarantined, said USDA spokeswoman Julie Quick. The USDA has not decided what to do with that herd.

The national beef market began to slump yesterday as 25 countries that account for 90 percent of U.S. beef exports now ban American products, according to the USDA.

A federal investigation is tracing the life of the infected cow before and after it arrived at Sunny Dene Ranch, a dairy farm in Mabton, 40 miles southeast of Yakima. More than 10,000 pounds of beef have been recalled from the Moses Lake slaughterhouse that killed the infected cow Dec. 9.


A backward trace of the cow's life led federal investigators to a Mattawa dairy, where it is believed that Sunny Dene purchased the infected heifer as part of a 100-head lot in 2001. Federal investigators are looking at a less-likely scenario that the infected cow was purchased from a nearby livestock yard.

But tracing the cow back to its birth herd — crucial in determining if other animals were infected by tainted feed — may be more difficult, said Dr. Ron DeHaven, the USDA's chief veterinarian. The agency thinks the birth herd could be in another state, or in Canada, where a mad-cow case was reported in May.

"If we're lucky, we could know something in a day or two," DeHaven said during a conference call yesterday. "But it might not be a matter if days. It might be weeks or months. And, given the lack of records, we might not be able to determine that at all."

Unraveling the life history of the infected animal and its offspring is complicated by the fact that there's no national identification system for U.S. cattle. The USDA has been studying a microchip system that would allow birth-to-death tracking, DeHaven said. But the system, which would be very expensive to implement, is still years away.

USDA officials say they don't know how many cattle may have to be destroyed, but millions were killed in Great Britain during efforts there to quell a massive outbreak.

Yakima County officials, relying on state and federal guidelines for agricultural disasters, have begun forming plans to protect soils and groundwater in case of a significant cow-kill.

"I think this next week, it's not going to be a pretty sight," said Frank Hendrix, the Yakima County extension agent and a cattle owner.

Fatal disease, huge losses

According to the federal Centers for Disease Control, 153 people worldwide have contracted bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). The disease, which is fatal to humans, is contracted by eating meat that contains brain or spinal cord from an infected animal. Among cattle, it is transmitted through infected feed, and testing for the disease requires the cow to be killed.

Although the Canadian case ended up being a single infected cow, protecting consumer confidence in beef came at a huge cost to cattlemen.

Canadian authorities began destroying cows five days after the infected cow was detected, leading to the slaughter of 1,700 cattle and temporary quarantines for 18 farms. Some 1,500 animals were tested, but no other cases of mad-cow disease were found.

The U.S. banned Canadian imports for more than three months, contributing to a $1.4 billion (U.S.) loss for the Canadian beef industry. Canada on Wednesday issued a partial ban on U.S. beef products.

With the investigation into the Mabton cow ongoing, federal authorities declined to estimate a financial toll. But in 2001, the Bush administration told Congress that the beef industry could lose $15 billion if mad cow spread as widely as it did in Great Britain.

Yesterday cattle prices, at a record high last week, dropped the daily market limit of 3 cents a pound, to 87.62 cents per pound for January live cattle. The daily maximum drop will be expanded to 5 cents for Monday, and some analysts predicted that live-cattle prices would plunge about 15 cents more before they stabilize.

Dairy products safe

Although Sunny Dene Ranch is barred from buying or selling cows, the quarantine does not extend to milk; BSE cannot be contracted through dairy products. The farm has continued producing milk for two dairy cooperatives, said Rae Klein, a spokeswoman for the Northwest Dairy Association, one of the cooperatives.

"(BSE) has no impact at all" on dairy products, she said.

But effects already are being felt in the state beef industry, which has annual sales estimated at $621 million. John Top, co-owner of the Toppenish Livestock Commission, said an auction planned Monday was postponed.

"We're not going to have it until some of the smoke clears and we can see what the market demand is," said Top, concerned that consumers will overreact.

Spurred by a European outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease among cattle in 2001, Washington state the following year developed a response plan for keeping animal diseases in check. If large numbers of animals must be destroyed, the plan says the National Guard could be called in to help dig mass graves, transport carcasses to incineration sites and clean and disinfect vehicles and equipment.

Still, Clive Gay, a Washington State University professor of veterinary medicine, said destroying large numbers of cattle would create a "big biological mess."

"There is no easy way of doing it, and there's probably no pleasant way of doing it, from the public perception," Gay said. "No one likes to see funeral pyres, and no one likes to see mass graves."

Jay Gordon, executive director of the Washington State Dairy Federation, said dairy farmers understand that quelling an outbreak may mean destroying animals. "We want to show this world we fully tracked this back, and this is an isolated case," he said.

DeHaven said ranchers have historically been compensated at fair market value for animals destroyed due to a disease outbreak.

Restrictions not in time?

In an effort to stave off a mad-cow outbreak, U.S. authorities banned using animal meat and bone in cattle feed in 1997, the year of Europe's outbreak.

Steve Sundlof, director of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Center for Veterinary Medicine, said yesterday that while Washington state is in nearly full compliance with the feed restrictions, that was not the case four and a half years ago, when the infected Mabton cow was born and likely contracted the disease.

The U.S. has also had cattle-trade restrictions since 1989 with countries considered at high risk for the disease.

Canada, however, was never placed on the restricted list until a mad-cow case was reported there in May, said Quick, the USDA spokeswoman.

Quick said cattle coming across the border were required to be checked for diseases such as brucellosis, a bacterial infection that can cause food poisoning.

But checking for BSE is difficult because it requires a member of the herd to be killed and its brain removed. Also, it can take four to six years for the disease to show up in an infected animal.

Seattle Times staff reporters Sandi Doughton, Kyung Song and Ian Ith, along with The Associated Press, contributed to this report. Jonathan Martin: 206-464-2605 or jonathanmartin@seattletimes.com



To: D_I_R_T who wrote (16698)12/27/2003 9:05:43 AM
From: paret  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 48461
 
U.S. Loses 90 Percent of Beef Exports
AP | 12/27/03 | EMILY GERSEMA

WASHINGTON (AP) - Just days after discovering the nation's first case of mad cow disease, the United States has lost nearly all of its beef exports as more than a dozen countries stopped buying American beef as insurance against potential infection.

Gregg Doud, an economist for the Denver-based National Cattlemen's Beef Association, said Friday that the United States, at today's market level, stands to lose at least $6 billion a year in exports and falling domestic prices because of the sick cow.

"We've lost roughly 90 percent of our export market just in the last three days," Doud said.

Keith Collins, the Agriculture Department's chief economist, said the market probably will not see the full economic impact of the mad cow case until trading intensifies after the holidays. He has said that 10 percent of U.S. beef is exported.

Japan, South Korea and Mexico are among the top buyers that banned American beef imports this week after the U.S. government announced it had found a cow in Washington state sick with the brain-wasting illness. An international lab in England confirmed the results Thursday.

As a safeguard, countries usually shut down meat imports from countries where the illness was found.

A U.S. delegation is leaving Saturday for Japan, which takes about one-third of all U.S. beef exports, and possibly other Asian countries that imposed bans on American meat and livestock this week. The Treasury Department said it is monitoring developments.

Mad cow disease, formally known as bovine spongiform encephalopathy, is a public health concern because it is related to a human disease, variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob. In Britain, 143 people died of the human illness after an outbreak of mad cow in the 1980s. People can get it if they eat meat containing tissue from the brain and spine of an infected cow.

Federal officials on Friday quarantined a herd of 400 bull calves, two of which were offspring of the sick cow. During its life, the infected cow bore three calves.

One calf is at the same dairy near Mabton, Wash., that was the final home of the diseased Holstein cow, one is at a bull calf feeding operation in Sunnyside, Wash., and a third died shortly after being born in 2001, said Dr. Ron DeHaven, chief veterinarian for the Agriculture Department.

"There is the potential that the infected cow could pass the disease onto its calves," he said. No decision has been made on destroying the herds, he said.

Investigators are focused on finding the birth herd of the cow, since it likely was infected several years ago from eating contaminated feed, DeHaven said. Scientists say the incubation period for the disease in cattle is four or five years.

Since 1997, the Food and Drug Administration has banned giving grazing animals feed that contains brain and spinal tissue to prevent the disease from appearing.

DeHaven said the investigation could lead to other states or Canada, which found a case mad cow disease in Alberta in May.

If U.S. officials determine the sick cow was imported from Canada and its offspring has been destroyed, they could protect the American beef trade from economic fallout, said Michael Stumo, an attorney for the Organization for Competitive Markets, a nonprofit group in Nebraska whose mission is to ensure fair markets for farmers.

But investigators have not yet found where the sick cow was born.

U.S. officials have repeatedly said the food supply is safe because the cow's brain, spinal cord, and lower part of the small intestine - where the disease is found - were removed before it was sent for processing.

Authorities are tracing where the meat from the animal was sent and the Agriculture Department has recalled 10,000 pounds of beef slaughtered Dec. 9 at Vern's Moses Lake Meat Co. in Washington state. Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman said it was an extra precaution.