SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Carl Shaw who wrote (24183)12/28/2003 1:15:03 AM
From: Rick McDougall  Respond to of 93284
 
Ideas From an Articulated Right, Or Not!

By Chris Zepeda
Contributor

It amazes me how poorly the Right continues to articulate their case for war. From lonely LMU grad-students to the President himself, the Right just cant find the “right” voice to convince the world that war is the answer.

In his Jan. 29 letter to the editor, Mr. David Cummings stated that LMU students should make their decisions and get a “real education” through “practical experience.” I’ve decided to take his advice. I’ve chosen to base my decision on our country’s “practical experience” with Saddam and the “practical reasons” the president is giving us to go to war.

Reason number one — Saddam Hussein is evil and has committed the “ultimate horror” — he gassed his own people. But I say, what was the United States’ reaction after he committed these vicious acts? The answer is that Bush Senior and the recycled Reaganites increased support to the Beast of Baghdad through chemical, agricultural and military aid. Thus, reason one obviously cannot be our motive for war since it was O.K. supporting Saddam more than ever when he was Commiting his worst atrocities.

Reason two — Saddam is a military threat to the world. If this is so, why wasn’t this true 20 years ago when his “military might” was at its peak? Again, what was the United States’s stance during this time? We increased our support and aid as long as he gave the precious oil.

Reason three — he still might have some weapons of mass destruction. Why wasn’t this important in the 80s? Why aren’t the other countries in the world — such as North Korea — that already possess these weapons, or have actually announced that they’re starting to make them a threat to us? We can answer this by asking ourselves what the major difference between these other countries is. Iraq has oil! By the way, what country has the most of these weapons of mass destruction? Don’t we have 20,000 of them? Aren’t we the only country ever to use them?

Reason four — what about the “war on terror?” It is logically and morally impossible for this White House to declare a war on terror. This is because of the fact that the people currently in the White House are the same people that have been condemned for their own acts of terror by the World Court and would have been condemned by the United Nations Security Council as well, except that the United States vetoed the resolution.

We’re zero for four so far.

In his State of the Union Address, President Bush stated that many of our problems today exist because of the fact that brutal military dictators took over weaker nations in the twentieth century. So could this be the reason for war? I doubt it. The twentieth century was the same period in which we took over the Philippines, overthrew democratically elected governments all over Latin America and supported the killing of 5,000 Iraqi children a month, just to name few. So this obviously can’t be the reason. . . unless we’re the evil brutes Bush was talking about? Maybe he was right.

Mr. Cummings asked us to remember last week what happened on Sept. 11. Let’s remember. Not one of the highjackers were Iraqi — the majority were Saudi Arabian. So why don’t we go after them? Because they have the largest oil reserves on the world and are our “allies.” Did I forget to mention that the Bush family has business ties with them more specifically a Saudi family named bin Laden? Don’t believe me? Look into Arbusto Oil and the Carlye Group and you’ll find out who George W. Bush made his first million with. Good luck looking through, the FBI has direct orders from the president not to investigate the bin Laden family. This might also help explain why, after Sept 11, only two planes were allowed in the United States airspace — Air Force One and the bin Laden family’s private jet. Investigating these family ties might answer Cumming’s question about how Sept. 11 might have been financed. It’s his question — we’ll leave it up to him to find the answer.

I partially agree with Mr. Cummings on one thing. I too am disappointed with the academic culture in America, although there is some irony in a gradate student degrading American academia with the ultimate graduate degree, a Ph.D. I’m disappointed that academics are not asking whom war affects most. Why aren’t they questioning the logic and history of those in Bush’s administration? Why aren’t they asking about what happened to the last country we “liberated?” Why aren’t they questioning why the attention has shifted from bin Laden to Iraq? Why, instead of discussing whether we should “go at it alone” or “with our allies,” aren’t they questioning whether we should go to war at all? The empirical evidence is there, yet the Ivory Tower remains silent. Maybe those intellectuals are taking Mr. Cummings’ advice by “shutting up” and standing “behind their president.” Or maybe, just maybe, those Ph.D.s are having difficulties trying to put a syllabus together for a course called “Common Sense 101” in a country with a president that seems to have none.
.



To: Carl Shaw who wrote (24183)12/28/2003 8:05:24 AM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93284
 
The contintuing saga of...it's perfectly safe, but we've recalled...

Cow Parts Used in Candles, Soaps Recalled

By RUKMINI CALLIMACHI
Associated Press Writer

December 27, 2003, 2:23 PM EST

PORTLAND, Ore. -- Cow parts -- including hooves, bones, fat and innards -- are used in everything from hand cream and antifreeze to poultry feed and gardening soils.

In the next tangled phase of the mad cow investigation, federal inspectors are concentrating on byproducts from the tainted Holstein, which might have gone to a half-dozen distributors in the Northwest, said Dalton Hobbs, spokesman for the Oregon Department of Agriculture.

Now, it's the secondary parts, the raw material for soil, soaps and candles, that are being recalled.

While some people fear consumers could be infected by inhaling particles of fertilizer or other products containing the mutated protein responsible for mad cow disease, a bigger concern is stopping tainted byproducts from infecting animal feed, believed to be the main agent for spreading the disease.

But tracing all of the sick cow's parts to their final destination, including numerous possible incarnations in household products, has proved challenging.

"It's like the old Upton Sinclair line -- 'We use everything but the squeal,'" Hobbs said. "We have nearly 100 percent utilization of the animal. But when you have so many niche markets, it makes it incredibly challenging to trace where this one cow may have gone."

Los Angeles-based Baker Commodities, Inc., announced Friday it has voluntarily withheld 800 tons of cow byproduct processed in its Seattle and Tacoma, Wash., plants. The company, like other "renderers," takes what is left of the cow after it is slaughtered and boils it down into tallow, used for candles, lubricants and soaps, and bone meal used in fertilizer and animal feed.

If the U.S. Food and Drug Administration determines that the material is tainted, the company's loss could total $200,000, said spokesman Ray Kelly.

"It's obviously a tragic thing for the whole beef industry, but it's definitely a sizable hit for us," he said.

Darling International, Inc., the nation's largest independent rendering operation in the U.S., has also been contacted by the FDA. But officials at their Tacoma and Portland plants, as well as at their international headquarters in Irving, Texas, declined to comment on how their operation has been affected.

"Our first priority was to make sure it didn't go into the food supply," said Hobbs, reiterating that meat sent to two Oregon distributors was recalled earlier in the week.

Companies that use bone meal from cows to create fertilizers popular with rose growers may find themselves under the spotlight. At the height of Britain's mad cow epidemic in the 1990s, three victims of the human form of mad cow were found to be gardeners.

In 1996, the Royal Horticultural Society of London released an advisory, cautioning gardeners to wear face masks after it was reported that the dust from the bone-meal soil could carry the mutated protein.

But Scientific American editor Philip Yam said there was no conclusive evidence the gardeners died from inhaling soil containing the infected cow tissue.

A far greater risk is the cow material -- including roughage and offal -- used in animal feed, said Yam, whose book, "The Pathological Protein," is a scientific account of the disease.

In 1997, the FDA banned cow feed that included cow byproducts, after scientists concluded that the feed was the main transmitter of mad cow disease. The disease, formally known as bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or BSE, is found in a cow's nervous system.

Yam points out that while giving cow feed to cows was outlawed, feeding it to poultry is still legal. Some farmers, he said, are still in the habit of feeding their cows "chicken litter" -- the remains of the poultry feed, scooped off the ground, feathers and all.

"It's one of those loopholes," Yam said. "It sounds good in theory -- don't feed cow to cow, feed the remains to chickens. But in practice things happen."

Critics also speculate that while chickens cannot contract BSE, they could act as carriers of the disease if they pick up prions in their feed and are themselves processed into cattle feed. Consumer advocates have also questioned whether feed processing plants have all strictly separated cow feed from other feed produced at the same facilities.

The Food and Drug Administration has said it will probably write new regulations that could require companies that slaughter "downer" livestock -- animals that are sick or injured -- to dispose of the brain and spinal cord before mixing animal feed and pet food, expanding on the 1997 ban.

Robert Assali, who manages Southern Oregon Tallow in Eagle Point, Ore., said he sees the end of his profession if the mad cow hype continues.

"We're going to become a mortuary service -- just hauling animals to landfills," Assali said.

Copyright © 2003, The Associated Press

-------------

If they play this right, they can get everybody to throw out their soap and candles and buy new stuff.