SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Henry Niman who wrote (176276)12/27/2003 9:33:46 PM
From: Amy J  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
If it is picking up where it left off last spring, then something in its epi trend appears significantly different than the spanish flu which had a horrible second year starting as early as Oct. Sars is more delayed and a lot smaller at the start of its second year than the Spanish flu was, so would tend to believe that implies Sars is less contagious throughout the entire population, superspreaders aside.

I tend to believe it is picking up where it left off, but just isn't as contagious as the Spanish flu (superspreaders aside).

The coincidence of it being able to start over, in a consecutive year, seems too high. It took how many centuries for this to be created in the first place, let alone twice. Unless there is some type of prexisting environment that now exists today, that didn't two years ago, that makes it conducive for restarts.

Which do you think it is?

Regards,
Amy J