Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (122392)	12/28/2003 9:44:01 PM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 281500

Hawk, In about 20 years son of GST will have forgotten that little news story of September, 2001 and will start writing the next version of revisionist history. Like father, like son. Mike

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (122392)	12/28/2003 11:10:56 PM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

<So does that mean that the US had no right to invade France during WWII? There existed no state of war between them and the US that I recall..> The only reason the US could have and did have to invade France was to drive out the Germans. By the way -- the French cheered our arrival, unlike the Iraqi's. The French did not want to live under German occupation. We liberated France from foreign occupation. We did not have to fight the French the way we are now fighting the Iraqis. But then we were an army of liberation in France, and we are an army of occupation in Iraq. Its funny how people the world over react to having an army of occupation on their soil.