Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (22008)	12/29/2003 6:49:36 AM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 793578

Iraq reconstruction on hold December 29, 2003 BY ROBERT NOVAK SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST A pall was cast over Christmas for disappointed U.S. government civilians in Baghdad when they received word two weeks ago that the $18.6 billion for Iraq's reconstruction rushed through Congress in November was indefinitely on hold. They have been told not to issue ''requests for proposal,'' which surely will extend the promised Feb. 1 date for contract awards. No announcement of the slowdown has been made, though the Pentagon has confirmed published reports. The closely held decision to hold up the process was made in Washington, with no explanation to anybody out of the Defense Department's inner circle -- not even to the Pentagon's own minions in Baghdad. The informed speculation is that the Bush administration is rethinking whether countries that opposed the Iraqi intervention should be cut off from reconstruction. Whatever the cause of the delay, its impact is undeniable. It postpones the flood of dollars into Iraq and the visible improvement of Iraq's infrastructure, which U.S. military and civilians there have expected would suppress support for guerrilla activity. Unprepared for what was required after the military triumph last May, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's team in Washington is still a step behind in capitalizing on the capture of Saddam Hussein. Nobody is more disappointed by these latest developments than retired Adm. David J. Nash, a civil engineer in Baghdad running the office in charge of managing the $18.6 billion in infrastructure reconstruction. Nash, who headed a construction firm in Warren, Mich., after 33 years in the Navy, came to Baghdad as part of the new team of technocrats sent to rebuild the country. Industrial leaders invited to meetings in Washington and London had been informed that contracts would be awarded Feb. 1, with construction to begin soon thereafter. When word of the delay seeped out after Saddam was taken into custody, the Defense Department told the Engineering News-Record on Dec. 16: ''This is an incredibly complex process.'' Last Friday, a Pentagon spokesman told this column that the requests for proposal ''are the responsibility'' of the Coalition Provisional Authority in Baghdad. Actually, the delay was ordered in Washington as a consequence of Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz's widely criticized order of Dec. 5 that barred Germany, France, Russia and China from reconstruction contracts. As special envoy James Baker negotiated with these countries for forgiveness of Iraqi debt, the expectation in Baghdad was that they eventually will be ordered from Washington to issue their requests with all countries now eligible to bid. However, officials at the CPA ask privately, will the United States in return get the dispatch of French and German troops to Iraq to share in the fighting and dying? Or, alternatively, might French and German soldiers go to Afghanistan or at least the Balkans to replace Americans, releasing them for service elsewhere? If George W. Bush does not make such a deal and opens up the construction bids in return for just debt forgiveness, one official told me, ''it will appear the president has been snookered.'' There is no disagreement inside the U.S. team that the national interest would be best served the more quickly Iraqi rebuilding begins. This will begin to cut into Iraq's huge unemployed labor pool and invigorate the economy. In addition, it may provide evidence of the U.S. long-term commitment to rebuilding the country. The terrorists will do their best to disrupt reconstruction projects, but the power of elements waging guerrilla warfare suffers from losing the source of devotion of what CPA officials call the ''Cult of Saddam.'' Since his capture, his followers and other guerrillas have stepped up the pace of their attacks. But U.S. intelligence is cutting into Saddam's support networks, and the military struggle is turning into a genuine police action. What's needed now is the rapid utilization of that $18.6 billion to rebuild Iraq, and that is why the unexplained slowdown is so frustrating. www.suntimes.com Back to regular view suntimes.com

To: greenspirit who wrote (22008)	12/29/2003 11:59:41 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793578

Exercised? LOL!! LB posted the quote TO ME, I followed the link and found the anomaly, which I reported in an utterly matter-of-fact way. <<Problem is, I traced back and haven't been able to find where he actually said it.>> Now, I realize that some folks have a problem with the matter-of-fact style, think those who use it are somehow "biased" or now "exercised." Next thing you know, down will be up and up will be down.