Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gamesmistress who wrote (22073)	12/29/2003 11:56:53 PM
From: MSI	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793622

now we know. Dean would be a president who would enter into bilateral negotiations with North Korea (like China and Japan shouldn't be involved?), purchase the entire uranium stockpile held by the former Soviet Union (I can see the Russians adding to the pile even as we speak) At the least. and raise the minimum wage by over 35% Doubt it. , if his philosophy really is to "give the working people a little more money and they might be able to go down and spend something on Main Street," LET US KEEP OUR FRIGGIN" TAX CUT!!! How much was your tax cut? How does that compare with increased taxes and expenses from every other part of gov't? Dean's claim is the disjointed assembly of special interest legislation has made us worse off, by far, than 4 years ago. The tax cut was great for me, temporarily, not good in the longer term for me and everyone I know who has kids or owns property. It's a dishonest way to go to "war", when Bush never met a special interest he didn't like. It makes the entire effort look like a trillion-dollar exercise in profiteering.