Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (8180)	12/30/2003 3:30:55 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10965

Very few of 57,700 voters would have voted huh? Why? Because they're "stupid minorities" who don't vote? What about the hundreds and thousands of non ex-felons whose votes were taken away just because they had a similar name as some out of state felon? Even if you were right it would still be more than enough to wipe out Bush's so-called lead of 523 votes. In fact it would have likely given Gore a 10,000 vote lead. Also, there was double and late voting by so-called "military" voters allowed AFTER the election. Florida was not called for Gore for very long at all. If I remember correctly, about 15 minutes time. The real cheating was the voter rolls themselves. Of course next time we also have to worry about the computer voting machines which can possibly be rigged and hacked. All this goes to the party in charge of the state, Bush's brother. No wonder Katherine Harris erased her hard-drives.