Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chas. who wrote (6414)	12/31/2003 7:31:36 AM
From: ChinuSFO	Respond to of 15987

Chuck, if after 2 years on the war against terrorism, if after the capture of Saddam (who I think does not have much to do with Osama), Bush admits that the world is not safer and requires air marshals on foreign carriers, then where is the progress on the war against terrorism. When one requires air marshals, then people wonder what is wrong with ground security? Why has Bush lost faith in ground security? Show me the "kick ass" approach is succeeding. For all the kick ass thoughts you have provided, you have missed out on those which are important to the common American voter: has our President been successful at balancing the need for security, liberty and economic stability for those who elected him. This is nothing new, this is not my invention. I am pointing you in the direction of what happened to Bush Sr. He won the battle in the battlefield but lost the war at the ballot box. YOu cannot win the ballot with the bullet. At least not in America.