Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NickSE who wrote (22294)	12/31/2003 11:54:11 AM
From: kumar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793658

New claims for jobless benefits fell last week to the lowest level in nearly three years, Alongside this statistic, to get a fair understanding, one has to count "continuing jobless benefit claims", as well as those that are beyond the 6 month unemployment benefit - they wont show up in new claims or continuing claims.

To: NickSE who wrote (22294)	12/31/2003 1:24:31 PM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 793658

Ghost, That could give the dems some traction but it wouldnt be correct economics either. The deficits may be stretched beyond what we like but just like interest rates, we have been in this unique supply side recession that needed all the stimulus it could get. Even some of the more wasteful of that spending was useful in that regard. But keep in mind that the size of the deficits have much to do with military and homeland defense spending and in war you must spend and borrow as needed. In 2004, especially if the republicans increase their majorities, some fiscal responsibility will return. Remember when dems call for fiscal responsibility they really are saying cut military and defense and raise taxes thru the roof. And you can see that clearly in the stupid gephart and dean tax repeal call. They will never cancel spending for a liberal program unless Bush pushed it like medicare reform just passed. Mike

To: NickSE who wrote (22294)	1/3/2004 7:40:02 AM
From: NickSE	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793658

IAEA lost what little credibility they had after they claimed Iran's nuclear program is peaceful. Powell, Chief U.N. Inspector Discuss Who Should Oversee Scrapping of Libya's Atomic Bomb Program ap.tbo.com VIENNA, Austria (AP) - The United States believes it would be well within its rights to lead the effort to scrap Libya's atomic weapons program, but it wants the debate taken out of the public arena, diplomats said. The diplomats said Secretary of State Colin Powell has spoken with chief U.N. nuclear inspector Mohamed ElBaradei about resolving differences with Washington. At issue is whether the International Atomic Energy Agency or Washington should police the destruction of Libya's nuclear arms program, which Tripoli disclosed publicly last month. Senior U.S. officials have said that will be carried out by a team of American and British experts and suggested the IAEA was poorly informed about the extent of Libya's nuclear activities. One diplomat said ElBaradei was infuriated by "potshots" directed at him and attributed in the U.S. media to unnamed senior administration officials. Diplomats who follow IAEA activities told AP on condition of anonymity that Powell suggested to ElBaradei that it would be best if public discussion over responsibility ended. "It was agreed to return to more diplomatic channels of communication," one diplomat said. However, another said the Americans remained firm in their view that it was their right to take the lead in scrapping Libya's suspect nuclear programs if asked to do so by Tripoli. "If Libya wants the United States to go in, then the Americans feel they are free to go in," he said. The diplomats told The Associated Press that Powell's recent telephone conversation with ElBaradei, director general of the IAEA, focused on tensions over Libya between the IAEA and U.S. administration officials already unhappy with the agency's stance on Iraq and Iran. Over the past year, the Egyptian law professor also has been the target of U.S. accusations that he minimized the nuclear weapons threats from Iraq under Saddam Hussein and from Iran. The United States maintained that both nations were trying to build atomic bombs, which the IAEA disputed. ElBaradei told AP on Tuesday that the IAEA intends to "do it alone" in destroying Libya's atomic programs. ElBaradei spokesman Mark Gwozdecky reinforced that message Friday, saying policing Libya's nuclear program and stripping it of arms applications was "our exclusive responsibility." In Washington, a State Department official denied friction with the IAEA, saying the agency has a role to play, along with the United States and the British. But, the official added, "Who does what needs to be worked out." Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi's recent acknowledgment that Libya sought weapons of mass destruction and his decision to renounce them - made after months of secret negotiations with the United States and Britain - surprised the IAEA, the U.N. body charged with keeping watch on nuclear programs. ElBaradei and an IAEA team visited four once-secret nuclear sites in Libya's capital, Tripoli, last weekend. While U.S. officials have suggested that the Libyan program was advanced, ElBaradei said that, from what his team saw, Libya still was years away from developing atomic bombs. During the trip, ElBaradei met with Gadhafi, who assured the IAEA chief that Libya would cooperate fully with inspections and eliminate its long-secret program, saying he wanted to turn Libya into a "mainstream" nation. Libya has promised to cooperate with the Vienna-based U.N. agency and said it would sign a protocol allowing intrusive inspections at short notice, similar to the one signed earlier this month by Iran.