SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: unclewest who wrote (22402)1/1/2004 5:42:33 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793689
 
When you have the Gay community as your "cutting edge," you are in "deep diarrhea."

The Dean campaign's first presidential fundraiser was June 22, 2002, on New York's Fire Island,


washingtonpost.com
Gay Community Gave Dean Early Boost
Civil Unions Law Signed in Vermont Drew Supporters

By Thomas B. Edsall
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, January 1, 2004; Page A08

Former Vermont governor Howard Dean's record-setting fundraising first took off in large part because of an outpouring of support from the gay community.

With just one exception, every fundraiser Dean attended outside Vermont in 2002 was organized by gay men and lesbians, as were more than half the events in the first quarter of 2003, according to Dean advisers.

"The early foundation of Governor Dean's presidential campaign -- both in fundraising and organization -- was built by the support of the LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender] community around the country," said Dean finance director Stephanie Schriock.

The gay community "was the first to recognize Dean's strength of character after his leadership on Vermont's civil union legislation, and because of that, they were the first to open up their homes for events and ask their friends and colleagues to give money to this endeavor," she added.

This early backing provided a foundation for Dean to expand his core support to include voters opposed to the Iraq war, angry at President Bush, embittered by the outcome of the 2000 election and discontented with what they saw as a Democratic Party establishment without backbone.

All nine Democratic presidential candidates support most issues of importance to gay organizations, but Dean has one major advantage: On April 26, 2000, he signed the nation's first law granting same-sex couples the right to enter legally sanctioned civil unions that provide many of the protections of traditional marriage.

The gay community has become a powerful force in the Democratic Party, reflecting the growing importance of socially and culturally liberal groups in providing both votes and money, as business and trade associations shift increasingly toward the Republican Party.

Key Democratic fundraisers estimate that the gay community provides at least 10 percent of the money flowing to the party and its nominees.

In a reflection of the politicization of the gay community, the Democratic National Committee's Gay and Lesbian Leadership Council, which requires a contribution of $10,000, has more than 300 members, said Executive Director Lila G. Gracey. Of the DNC's constituency groups, the top three sources of cash are the Gay and Lesbian Leadership Council, the Business Council, and the Women's Leadership Forum.

In 2001 and early 2002, well before he announced his candidacy, Dean capitalized on his signing of the civil unions law and his hero status in the gay community, speaking to branches of the Human Rights Campaign and other organizations across the county.

Some of the largest contributions to the Fund for a Healthy America, the political action committee Dean set up in 2001 to finance the exploration of a presidential campaign, were from prominent leaders in the gay community.

In November 2001, David Bohnett, chairman of the David Bohnett Foundation, which according to its Web site supports "the positive portrayal of lesbians and gay men in the media," gave the Dean PAC $5,000, and Charles C. Nolan, the partner of DNC Treasurer Andrew Tobias, gave $2,500. In December, Kathy Levinson, a successful Palo Alto, Calif., entrepreneur and founder of the Lesbian Equity Foundation of Silicon Valley, contributed $5,000.

One of the first major donors to Dean after he formally announced his candidacy was Georgetown University law professor Craig Hoffman. He first heard Dean speak at a California meeting of gay philanthropists sponsored by the Gill Foundation and in May 2002 contributed $1,000.

Even though the view then was that "he didn't have a chance," Hoffman said, "I didn't care, because at least there was someone saying things that I believed in without being afraid." In November 2002, Hoffman hosted a Dean fundraiser in Washington that 40 people attended.

The Dean campaign's first presidential fundraiser was June 22, 2002, on New York's Fire Island, a summer resort community popular among gays. James F. Guidera of New York was on Fire Island and decided to see what an unknown former Vermont governor had to say. He left impressed. "If you are in the gay community and you see a governor who signs the civil unions law and everyone else is afraid of the whole concept, and even Democrats are helping to pass the Defense of Marriage Act, then Dean stands out," Guidera said.

In June 2002, Guidera gave the Dean presidential campaign $1,000, then the maximum allowed under law.

Guidera and other donors said they were impressed not only by Dean's outspoken support of gay rights but also by his enthusiastic readiness to do battle with the GOP on controversial and divisive issues.

"The Republican Party seems eager to run against me because of my role in enactment of this historic law. I welcome that debate," Dean writes on his Web site. "I can't wait to ask the President of the United States . . . to repudiate the GOP-authored Defense of Marriage Act, an unconstitutional, mean-spirited law that stoked fears of homosexuality."

The gay community's support has paid off not only in cash -- helping Dean set an all-time Democratic record of at least $40 million raised through the end of last year -- but also in a decisive lead among gay voters, according to two surveys.

"Dean realized that after civil unions happened he had a naturally expanded base beyond Vermont, a constituency that was looking for someone, a constituency that wanted a change from the existing administration as strongly as any other," said Chuck Wolfe, executive director of the Gay & Lesbian Victory Fund.

Winnie Stachelberg, political director of the Human Rights Campaign, said, "Governor Dean early on used his support from the gay and lesbian community as key building blocks to a campaign that we see as hugely successful, as having built a large grass-roots network both in terms of contributors and ground troops." The group has not endorsed a presidential candidate.

Two independent surveys of gay voters last summer showed Dean holding a substantial lead over his Democratic opponents, a 22-percentage-point lead in one, and a 33-point lead in the other.

One of the first organizations to endorse Dean was the New Jersey-based Gay and Lesbian Political Action and Support Groups (GayPASG), run by John Campbell and Richard Harrison.

Campbell said he and Harrison were in Vermont "the day civil unions became available."

"We got our license the first day and a justice of the peace to do the ceremony," he said. "We've been supportive of him ever since." They have held three Dean fundraisers.

© 2004 The Washington Post Company



To: unclewest who wrote (22402)1/1/2004 7:39:41 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793689
 
Breaching Round for M-16s (Ding-Dong!)

Another SOCOM (Special Operations Command) weapon has become popular with regular troops in Iraq. It’s a 12 gauge shotgun that replaces the 40mm grenade launcher under an M-16 or M-4 rifle (using the same attachment hardware), and firing a special shotgun round for blowing down doors. The Knight’s Armament Company (KAC) "12-gauge `Masterkey’ breaching module" has a three round magazine, a ten inch barrel and weighs nine pounds. The shotgun can be used alone, with the addition of a special stock attachment.

Usually, one or two rounds will knock down most doors. The large number of raids U.S. troops perform in Iraq, makes this weapon popular. Many units simply take along shotguns, loaded with the solid shot "breaching rounds." But the KAC system means one less piece of equipment to carry, and gives the user an M-16 rifle to use as well.
"Fatima! Someone’s at the door! Open it quick before they blow it down!"

American nuclear sub grounded in Spain (followup)

An American nuclear sub (the USS Hartford) that grounded itself while training off the Spanish coast two months ago, apparently suffered worse damage that originally thought. The sub has just recently been dry docked and examined in detail. It was known that the bottom half of the rudder was torn off, but the gouges in the hull were deeper than first thought. Initially, it was thought that the damage was less serious. Although the sub was able to steam back to dry dock facilities at Groton, Connecticut, it had to do so at half speed, taking a month for a trip that normally is made in two weeks.

The cause of the accident was sloppiness by the six sailors in the navigation team. Too much time was allowed to elapse between position updates and the sub went aground while navigating shallow coastal waters. All six sailors in the "navigation party" were punished for dereliction of duty. The captain of the sub, and his boss (the commander of Submarine Squadron 22, based in Spain), were both relieved of duty. The implication here is that the training and discipline of the navigation party were not up to standard, and the ship’s captain and the squadron commander are responsible for training and discipline. The damage to the Hartford may require expensive repairs to the hull and keep the sub out of service for up to a year.

Big oops here. Sounds like a bunch of careers just hit the rocks.

rantburg.com



To: unclewest who wrote (22402)1/1/2004 8:39:00 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793689
 
Another good example of why I do not like the Generals running our Air Force. Back in the 60s, the Army had the Marines put "hard points" on Mohawks when they ordered them, in an attempt to get a ground support plane. The Air Force never let it be used that way in Nam.

WARPLANES: Why Afghanistan Still Hasn't Got an Air Force



January 1, 2004: Many reports have come out of Afghanistan on the efforts to rebuild the national army. But nothing has been heard about rebuilding the Afghan air force. That's because there is a struggle going on in the Pentagon between U.S. Air Force officers who want a "proper air force" with jet fighters (the U.S. has a lot of low mileage, slightly used, F-16s available).

But others protested that this would take too long and that what the Afghans really needed was a bunch of smaller, slower aircraft that could double as trainers. There are quite a few aircraft like this available, and they are used by many third world countries for border patrol and counter-insurgency. It's easier to train pilots to use them, cheaper to buy them and much less cheaper to operate them. It costs $2,000 per flying hour to operate an F-16, but less than half that for trainer/light attack types.

These "trainer/light attack aircraft" can also operate from crude airports, or even a stretch of highway. But from the U.S. Air Force point of view, there are several problems with these aircraft. First, none of these aircraft are made in the United States, so Congress will not be happy about U.S. tax dollars buying non-American warplanes. Second, the U.S. Air Force has no experience with these aircraft. Finally, the air force doesn't want something like this to succeed in Afghanistan and raise questions about U.S. Air Force tactics and buying decisions.

So far, this battle is a stalemate, and the Afghans are left with no air force of their own. But the Afghans could just decide to go form one on their own. For example, Brazil manufactures the Super Tucano, a single engine turbo-prop trainer/attack aircraft that is used over a dozen nations. This aircraft carries two .50 caliber machine-guns and carries 1.5 tons of bombs and rockets. It can stay in the air for 6.5 hours at a time. It is rugged, easy to maintain and cheap ($5 million each, versus over $20 million each for used F-16s.) Afghanistan already has hundreds of pilots who would quickly learn how to handle the Super Tucano. This aircraft could be easily equipped to carry a dozen of the new 250 pound GPS smart bombs (or half a dozen dumb 500 pound bombs), giving it considerable firepower. The Super Tucano already comes equipped with a GPS guidance system. Max altitude is 35,000 feet and cruising speed is 400 kilometers an hour. Naturally, this aircraft can move in lower and slower than any jet can. The Super Tucano is also equipped with armor for the pilot, a pressurized cockpit and an ejection seat. Not bad for an aircraft with a max take off weight of 3.5 tons.

Another proposal is to use a "combat crop duster," originally built at the behest of the U.S. State Department to spray drug crops in nations that produce lots of illegal crops. This aircraft, the Turbo-Thrush S2R-T65/5400 NEDS (Narcotics Eradication Delivery System), has armor for the two man crew, can stay in the air for seven hours, a cruising speed of 272 kilometers an hour and a max altitude of 25,000 feet. The five ton aircraft normally carries about two tons of crop dusting chemicals. The manufacturer modified one for combat use, calling it the AYRES V-1-A Vigilante, simply by equipping it with hardware compatible with military bomb racks. The V-1-A can carry two tons of bombs, machine-gun pods, sensors or whatever. No fancy cockpit or ejection seat, but very maneuverable and over 2,500 of the original crop duster version in use world wide. Each ones costs less than two million dollars.

While an Afghan Air Force officer could understand the usefulness of the V-1-A or Super Tucano, U.S. Air Force officers cannot. This has been the case since the Vietnam war, when pragmatic air force officers got some prop-driven light bombers into action and demonstrated their obvious superiority over jets in counterinsurgency warfare. While the troops loved this kind of air support, the guys who ran the U.S. Air Force did not, and still don't.
strategypage.com