Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (4861)	1/1/2004 8:34:57 PM
From: Don Earl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Ray, Thanks for the links. On the first site, I found it interesting how many attorneys, large contractors and one rep for commercial recyclers (remember the WTC steel?) made their way to the organization's BOD. Their high tech site with professional graphics must have cost a fortune. The second site looked a lot less like a campaign promotion for the Bush Cartel, but it struck me as more editorial than informative. This is more the kind of thing I was thinking about after doing a little poking around. I typically avoid blogs, but for eye witness accounts, blogs are likely the best resource. parishofshotton.org.uk nycbloggers.com My thought was that if there were bombs and seismic events, a lot of folks should have mentioned what they saw, felt or heard. From a quick look at a few samples, that does appear to be the case. Things along the lines of, "The ground shook and the building fell.", or, "I heard an explosion and turned to see the tower falling.". This is the search string I used if anyone else wants to play around with the idea: search.yahoo.com If the steel got hot enough for the supports to begin slowly bending, the beginning of the collapse should have been the least violent part of the event, especially considering the acceleration of gravity is at its slowest when an object starts falling. Noise and vibrations should have been at the highest point toward the end of the collapse, not at the beginning.

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (4861)	1/2/2004 10:38:00 PM
From: Rick McDougall	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Hopefully this keeps you busy and out of my hair:o) Message 19649064

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (4861)	1/3/2004 6:53:03 PM
From: nz_q	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

Firefighter witnesses, reports bomb explosions inside the towers? One of the first firefighters in the stricken second tower, Louie Cacchioli, 51, told People Weekly on Sept. 24: "I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there were bombs set in the building." Kim White, 32, an employee on the 80th floor, also reported hearing an explosion. "All of a sudden the building shook, then it started to sway. We didn't know what was going on," she told People. "We got all our people on the floor into the stairwell ... at that time we all thought it was a fire ... We got down as far as the 74th floor ... then there was another explosion." serendipity.li The Pentagon is even more strange: And what actually happened to the TWO Boeing Eengines ?,............ The firefighters who entered the burning Pentagon building saw NO debris,..... and found NO engines inside the Pentagon building. (Yet the FBI still claim they found the TWO black boxes,...!?.,... Evidently the FBI is prepared to do everything to corrupt any of the involved crimescenes). Also the remaining walls in the attacked part of the burning Pentagon were destroyed only few hours after the attack. This destruction was made by a huge demolition crane bombsinsidewtc.dk I wonder if any of these firefighters and other first response crews will be deposed and what happened.