Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Coz who wrote (5328)	1/1/2004 8:28:06 PM
From: The Philosopher	Respond to of 20773

Gee. The earth, which for millenia has been losing spin very gradually, has suddenly stopped losing spin, and has added spin to come back to full spin. Must be that Bush Administration putting out so much spin that it affected the whole globe. No other explanation one can think of. And, when in doubt, of course, the solution is to blame everything bad on Bush anyhow, right? cnn.com

To: Coz who wrote (5328)	1/2/2004 6:54:07 AM
From: Ron	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

A model of rectitude -- that's us By Molly Ivins Creators Syndicate Well! I am certainly glad to see that we are telling off the French, Germans and Russians. I couldn't agree more with the Bush administration that those treacherous, undependable countries should be punished for their past cooperation with Saddam Hussein by being shut out of the $18.6 billion in Iraqi reconstruction contracts. No contracts for quislings! Someone's got to uphold standards of morality and purity, and who better than us? As the president so often reminds us, this is a fight between good and evil. I was particularly pleased when Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz took that sharp little dig at all three countries when he said that a prime consideration for who gets the contracts was "protection of the essential security interests of the United States." And was there ever anything more inimical to our security than all those tons and tons of weapons of mass destruction we have found in Iraq? That'll teach those vodka-swilling Rooskies to think our security is not their affair. Way to go, Wolfie. Of course, it was a little awkward that Wolfowitz gave the three Saddam-dealing nations that body slam just as former Secretary of State James Baker was setting out to ask them for money. The beauty of our position is its moral clarity. I was especially entranced to read about the moral case for stiffing these nations on the Op-Ed page of The New York Times in an article by Claudia Rosett, senior fellow with the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies. It says on its Web site that the foundation is against terrorism, thus distinguishing it from all the foundations in favor of terrorism. Rosett calls the three delinquent countries "the Axis of Avarice." Isn't that cute? In all fairness, the senior fellow reminds us: "Remember, plenty of money flowed through Saddam Hussein's Iraq. … many countries took part in that frenzy of lending, including Japan as the No. 1 sovereign lender. Then came Russia, France and Germany and, yes, the United States as No. 5." But surely you see the immense moral difference between being No. 5, as opposed to being 2, 3 or 4? All the difference in the world. Rosett continues: "But in the 1990s, as the Iraqi dictator's depravities became increasingly evident to the rest of the world, that list narrowed." (Actually, his depravities had been evident to many of us as far back as the days when the Reagan administration was sending Saddam arms.) The senior fellow continues: "Under the U.N.'s oil-for-food program, the despot got to tap his preferred business partners. … What began as a relief program for Iraqis suffering under sanctions turned into a multibillion dollar contracting business flowing through the shrouded books of the United Nations. By the end, the Russians were selling the Baathist elite luxury cars, the French were providing broadcasting equipment for the Information Ministry, and the Germans and Chinese worked on the phone system. … Old Europe's indignation over the [U.S.] list is a marvel of hypocrisy." Speaking of marvels of hypocrisy, the U.N. books on who dealt with Iraq are not all that shrouded. For example, one of the disgusting companies actually making profits from dealing with the despicable dictator in the 1990s -- long after his depravities had become evident to even the less-attentive sectors of the world -- was … well, golly, look at this … Halliburton. Between 1997 and 2000, while Vice President Dick Cheney was CEO of Halliburton, the company sold $73 million worth of oilfield equipment and services to Saddam. At least Halliburton was not selling luxury cars to the Baathist elite. The oilfield equipment company merely kept Saddam's oilfields pumping, the only thing that allowed the slimeball to stay in power. Halliburton cleverly ran its business with Saddam through two of its subsidiaries, Dresser-Rand and Ingersoll-Dresser, to avoid the sanctions. Unlike the Germans, the French and the Russians, Halliburton was not punished by the Bush administration for dealing with the dictator. Instead, it got the largest reconstruction contract given by this administration, with an estimated value between $5 billion and $15 billion. And the company got the contract without competitive bidding. Halliburton has amply repaid the administration's faith. The Pentagon is now investigating the company on potentially $120 million in overcharges. I think the French will particularly enjoy being lectured on their hypocrisy, preferably by Cheney himself. It's the kind of thing that sophisticated people especially appreciate.