Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (22594)	1/2/2004 2:45:33 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 793559

LOL! What I see is that you can't or won't accept your own bias in these matters. Aye, there's the rub! I have accepted my bias & openly acknowledge it. Because I know I'm biased, when I take a firm stand, I make sure I can back it up with real facts & credible evidence. And when time or events dictate otherwise, I'll change my POV rather than remain inflexible & wrong. Where we differ, is that I take my bias into consideration when forming my POV. You don't, won't or can't. And that is why we end up disagreeing so often. You defend the indefensible. You dispute clear instances of liberal bias, yet rarely provide factual or credible evidence to make your point. Your biased opinion does not trump cold hard fact IMO. If anything, it just gets you more credible examples that refute your POV. That obvious hit piece was a prime example of your bias outweighing facts & reality. IMO, you were so caught up in discrediting liberal media bias that you posted that hit piece as some kind of "mirror" or that it proved something significant. If anything, that hit piece was another example of obvious liberal bias..... blind, reckless & inflexible bias.