SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (176362)1/2/2004 3:12:50 PM
From: Charles Tutt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
But see? In that case the "friend of a friend" is corroborated by other indicia. If it were all we had, without corroboration, we'd (probably) be more inclined to believe Otellini.

Again, JMHO.

Charles Tutt (SM)



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (176362)1/4/2004 11:40:14 AM
From: steve harris  Respond to of 186894
 
Lizzy,
our buddy Otellini declared 2003 as the year of the Itanic.

theregister.co.uk
siliconvalley.com

With AMD's 64 bit solution in 2004, he probably is right.
Steve



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (176362)1/4/2004 8:17:23 PM
From: Dan3  Respond to of 186894
 
Re: Otellini's claim that Intel sold 100K of those boxes last quarter

IIRC, Otellini said Intel would ship over 100K chips, which represents sales of between 1/3 and 1/5 of what selling 100K boxes would have meant.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (176362)1/4/2004 9:43:57 PM
From: ptanner  Respond to of 186894
 
re: "...Otellini's claim that Intel sold 100K of those boxes last quarter"

IIRC this was for 2003 and not a single quarter (and as Dan noted it was processors rather than systems).

-PT