Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (22619)	1/2/2004 4:13:04 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793779

"Why don't you tell me what your problem with what I said? Without that I can only deal with what I guess might be your problem." Then how can you claim that I nuanced an accurate paraphrasing of your own words in proper context? So rather than acknowledge what you said was accurate, you claim I nuanced its real meaning. Bottom line. You said..... "I'd be quite content with people voting Republican if the Feel Good Christians comprised the party rather than the Professional Christians." Message 19646963 That means you believe that the Republican party is "comprised" of "Professional Christians". I asked you to define what a Professional Christian was. You said.... "The usage is my own. It parallels the usage of professional -victim, -virgin, -scold, etc. Someone who is all about whatever that thing is with which they most identify, showy and self-righteous and aggressive about it, see the whole world through that lens. It's akin to the usage of feminazi. It's not a compliment." Message 19647462 Then the above is your expressed view of the Republican Party using your own words in proper context. I have serious problems with your mis-perception of reality.