To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1158 ) 1/3/2004 2:11:31 PM From: barbers Read Replies (1) | Respond to Thank you for your reply. I believe all your scenarios are very logical. I only mentioned the cafeteria worker because my friend (Dec 2000)had friendly advances made towards her from a worker and she also was very friendly, beautiful, tall, and blonde. The worker gave her a gift and that made her very uncomfortable. She sought my advice. The gift might have only been because she was nice to him, not anything else. She returned the gift and told him it was very sweet. My advice was not to upset him, but make it clear she was not available. Friendly girls sometimes talk to much and Suzanne might have mentioned the “Buddy Party”, something she was very proud of participating in. Who knows who might have known what she was doing that night. It was just a nagging thought....but I am sure the thought was present because I was following this case from afar and any bit of information about the Yale community could be pertinent. They did not belong to the same college, therefore had different dining facilities, but workers can change locations. After your scenarios it does not seem logical. You are very familiar with the layout of the area therefore understand how she moved around that evening. But if someone was stalking her and knew the area well......that is a different story. Stalkers can be very discrete.
