Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (22758)	1/3/2004 1:37:49 AM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 793570

Here is a commentary on Hanson's article from the "Belmont Club" Blog. The shocking thing about Hanson's article is that it had to be written. But it was not until 1950, after four years of continuous Soviet expansion and the acquisition of an A-Bomb, that America realized it was facing a real enemy. Even then it did not arm nor consider where the front line against Soviet aggression should be. The defense of South Korea following its invasion was almost an afterthought, and for days after the Nokors swarmed across the border, the United States could hardly bring itself to believe it. And even after 50,000 Americans had died, Korea was never accorded the status of war, merely a "police action". Ironically, the same cast of characters who Hanson blames for the willful blindness to see the current enemy was responsible for the historical invisibility of Korea -- whose attack they helped prepare. The Left, though the British spy Don MacLean, recently glorified in a BBC "documentary", may have provided the key document, NSC 48, which encouraged Stalin to invade South Korea. And although Stalin was finally beaten back, those who made him possible were not. There is a final though unintended analogy between the Iraqi army and the Ba'athist substructure and the Stalinist legions and the Western left in Hanson's article. He asks us whether we can still recognize evil itself and concludes that he is doubtful. In an era of the greatest affluence and security in the history of civilization, the real question before us remains whether the United States—indeed, whether any Western democracy—still possesses the moral clarity to identify evil as evil, and then the uncontested will to marshal every available resource to fight and eradicate it. In that sense, our willingness to use unremitting force to eliminate vast cadres of proven killers, in Iraq and elsewhere, is a referendum on modern democracy itself. belmontclub.blogspot.com