Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (8324)	1/4/2004 12:39:15 AM
From: Mephisto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10965

Dean has been attacked constantly. We subscribe to the NYTimes. I believe the paper has been unfair, but I also believe the current top guy, Bill Keller, is a closet republican.

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (8324)	1/4/2004 12:11:13 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10965

Dean's bad coverage has nothing to do with his media stands, it has to do with his lack of foreign experience, runty appearance, gaffes and poor polling versus Bush. Also, he enjoyed almost a year of positive press until now, right before the actual elections. The press wants a story and no one but Bob Graham has given up yet. A comeback story or two could really make the race exciting. Remember, not a single person has voted for Howard Dean yet. Or anyone else. The real turning point may have been when Kucinich took on the moderator in the NH debate blasting hm for talking about polls and fundraising. Kucinich was right. People want to decide by fair voting, not let the polls, fundraisers and pundits decide. In 1992 80% of Dems made up their minds within 2 weeks of the primaries elections. Therefore even a Dean 20 point lead in NH could evaporate completely by voting day. Stay tuned.