Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (519362)	1/4/2004 12:53:13 PM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

So what? Seems to me that many people did NOT want to vote for Gore, so they may have ALL stayed home had NADAR not run. We can say the same thing about Bush41 and Ross Perot.

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (519362)	1/4/2004 4:35:23 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

I think PROLIFE did a rather good job in his response. Without Perot, Slick Willie would have remained a hick stick in Arkansas. You really wanna play this game? Gore wouldn't have gotten within a country mile of the nomination if it weren't for Ross. BFD. It didn't happen the way you envision. The former hero of so many liberal airheads, Ralph Nader, DID run, in spite of repeated warnings of what he would do. You blame this on GWB too? Nader's votes would have likely gone to Gore. Speculation. Prove it. Part of Nader's vote was against Slick Willie and NAFTA. We know that Jeb (Florida) paid Nader to Speak at FSU. We know that Greyout Davis knocked Richard Riordan out of the '98 CA governor's race too. Are you going to jump on Greyout for playing dirty? Or does it only matter who you're playing dirty against? Is this your moral high ground?