SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (22977)1/5/2004 1:04:38 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793689
 
THE SCENE
A New Episode of 'Friends'? No, Just Democrats Debating
By DAVID M. HALBFINGER New York Times

JOHNSTON, Iowa, Jan. 4 — For sheer comedic appeal, the Democratic presidential debate on Sunday was short a Sharpton, though it had its moments. As when Howard Dean offhandedly promised to balance the budget "in the sixth or seventh year of my administration."

Someone howled, and the audience, noticeably short of Dean partisans, broke up at the presumptuousness. Dr. Dean seemed not to realize that he was the butt of the joke, and even his campaign manager, Joe Trippi, later said he thought the crowd was laughing with him.

Then there was the moment when Carol Moseley Braun, resplendent in a dark suit (as were all the men on stage) but largely silent as the microphone-hoggers to either side of her went at one another, pleaded for a minute of "personal privilege" to get a word in edgewise.

But this was the first debate in months in which the rivals were permitted to question one another, and it quickly, if briefly, looked something like a schoolyard rumble.

Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut flailed away at Howard Dean over tax cuts, Iraq and the sealing of some of his records as governor of Vermont, chewing up so much time in rebuttals and counterrebuttals that the moderator Paul Anger, editor of The Des Moines Register, asked the two to "take it outside, if you need to."

At one point, the all-positive-all-the-time Senator John Edwards of North Carolina, after chastising Representative Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri for negative attacks, himself all but called Mr. Gephardt a liar, though in fairness, he had just caught Mr. Gephardt in a falsehood, for saying that everyone onstage but he and Representative Dennis J. Kucinich of Ohio had voted for the North American Free Trade Agreement.

As Mr. Gephardt conceded his mistake but did not quite say he had been wrong, hands raised across the stage, but Mr. Kucinich beat out Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts for the floor.

It was one of several times Mr. Kerry was left hanging. At another point, he waved his arms in frustration, dropping a sheet of notes to the floor.

Even Ms. Braun managed to get into the act, pointing out that Mr. Edwards had voted against a ban on corporate farm ownership of both meat production and packing facilities. Mr. Edwards said he had done so to protect North Carolina farmers but would support such a ban as president.

Asked if she had any rebuttal, Ms. Braun smiled and said, "No, no, just the record."

Mr. Kucinich, who several times tried and failed to pin down Dr. Dean on how he would get American troops out of Iraq, won at least one round of questioning: when the candidates were all asked to name a mistake they had made and what they had learned from it.

Mr. Kucinich, a former mayor of Cleveland, owned up to having "fired the chief of police, live, on the 6 o'clock news on Good Friday," adding: "If any of you can top that, I'll yield to you. But let's say that in the years since, I have learned a certain amount of diplomacy."

The other candidates' answers were more self-serving.

Mr. Gephardt said he had voted for Ronald Reagan's 1981 tax cuts. Mr. Edwards said he had trusted President Bush to administer the No Child Left Behind law fairly. Mr. Kerry said he had failed to respond to an attack in his first political race. And Mr. Lieberman said he had once focused more on the rights of criminals than crime victims as Connecticut's attorney general.

Only Dr. Dean cited a mistake from the current campaign, going out of his way to apologize yet again, as he did in answer to a similar question at a debate last fall, for having said in March that Mr. Edwards had supported the Iraq war but failed to stand by his position.

Dr. Dean's choice, interestingly, had nothing to do with any of his recent, and often clarified, statements about Saddam Hussein, Osama bin Laden and the Book of Job. Whether omitting those was a mistake, he did not say.

Outside the auditorium, in the snow, hundreds of supporters of several candidates proved their loyalty, if not their sanity, by gathering hours ahead of time, staking out pieces of turf in a wintry office park and chanting boisterously for their candidate, perhaps just to keep warm.

Mr. Kerry's people raised a tower with his logo, "The Real Deal," and shouted "J.K. all the way" at supporters of Mr. Gephardt. The Gephardt backers, who had their own sign on a crane, shouted back, louder.

Dr. Dean's campaign showed its gift for one-upmanship: not one but three cranes held huge banners aloft spelling out "Win," "With" and "Dean," at the entrance to the Iowa Public Television studio where the debate was held.

And Mr. Edwards's supporters mirrored his bent for sidestepping the crossfire by picking a spot a few hundred yards up the road.

Inside, the debate cooled down when the candidates could no longer question one another, even when the panelists did their best to provoke. When Mr. Anger told Mr. Kucinich that many Democrats did not think he was electable, he said, "Well, I'm electable if you vote for me."

"Then why are your poll ratings in low single digits," he was asked.

"Oh, well, they're just about to come up."

Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (22977)1/5/2004 4:19:26 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793689
 
Reason Hit and Run

(Edit: I got $2.37) - Apparently I Sued Citibank
My latest Citibank Visa bill includes a credit for 73 cents, my share of the "SCHWARTZ SETTLEMENT REFUND." As a reader of Overlawyered.com noted last month (along with many other people who scrutinize credit card bills faster than I do), the money comes from an $18 million fund created to settle a class action lawsuit challenging Citibank's 10 a.m. deadline for payments. The refunds ostensibly are compensation for inappropriate late fees, but a Citibank recording explains that it was impossible to allocate the money with any precision and that qualifying customers generally received less than a dollar. The lawyers got $9 million.

The Saddam Effect. Or Not.
Here's two reports about the effect of Saddam's capture on insurgency in Iraq.

The first, from the Washington Times, says "that guerrilla attacks [in Baghdad] have dropped sharply since the Dec. 13 capture of Saddam Hussein."

The second, from Knight-Ridder via the San Jose Mercury News, says "Saddam Hussein's capture three weeks ago has not slowed the anti-American insurgency in Iraq, which now seems more entrenched than ever, according to a review of recent attacks and interviews with U.S. and Iraqi officials."

Now that that's all cleared up, we can really enjoy the weekend's football games.

Bread, Circuses, Racecars

Eszter at Crooked Timber notes that the Hungarian government has decided to drop $4 million to sponsor a Formula One racer. She writes: "If this happened in a country with adequate social services and few people living in poverty then perhaps one could contemplate its legitimacy. But in a country with as many social problems as Hungary, I find it hard to swallow."

Commenter Dan Simon adds a perceptive postscript:

While I personally don’t care for the idea of $4 million in government money being spent on a Formula 1 team, I take some small consolation in the fact that lots of ordinary Hungarians of little means will probably get some enjoyment out of it. If instead the government had blown $4 million on, say, a Rothko for the Hungarian national art museum, how many low-income Hungarians would have been likely to get a big thrill out of it—and how many Crooked Timber collectivists would have complained?

Sure, But Is It Worse Than the Holocaust, Too?

"This is 10,000 times worse than the worst thing anybody thinks Michael Jackson ever did to a little boy." --Christopher Byron of the New York Post, on the video game Grand Theft Auto: Vice City

reason.com



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (22977)1/5/2004 8:40:34 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793689
 
IRAQ - We have come to banish darkness'
Miami Herald

Elan S. Carr, an attorney, is a first lieutenant in the U.S. Army Reserve. He led the Hanukkah observance in Baghdad using a lamp donated by a Jewish Iraqi artist.

`Banu hoshekh legharesh'' -- We have come to banish darkness. Thus begins a famous Hanukkah song, and no phrase better encapsulates the holiday's deeper meanings. This year, as a U.S. soldier serving in Iraq, several colleagues and I lit a Hanukkah lamp and uttered those words in a place that had never before heard them: the former presidential palace of Saddam Hussein, in the capital city of a new and free Iraq.

One is hard-pressed to imagine a holiday whose themes are more resonant with the events unfolding here: a spectacular military victory, the defeat of a despot, the resanctification of what had been desecrated. Truly, the banishment of darkness.

Hussein's killing machines

For too many years, the people of Iraq have suffered horrors that defy imagination. Like Antiochus, the Syrian Hellenist king against whom the Jews revolted in 165 BCE in the event commemorated by Hanukkah, Hussein thought himself to be like a god, or at least like those demigods of Mesopotamian history, Nebuchadnezzar and Hannibal, with whom his boundless vanity inclined him regularly to equate himself.

He dispensed licentious pleasure and horrible pain, life and death, with the nonchalance of one who thought himself above humanity itself. I have seen some of the evidence of his horrors, and I am sickened by them.

I have met Iraqis who lost their closest relatives to Hussein's killing machines. I have walked the halls of the decadent monuments that he built for himself while his people wasted away for want of food and freedom. I have visited Hussein's execution chambers at the notorious Abu Ghreib prison.

I saw the ceiling hooks that were used to torture prisoners. I saw the prison's infamous ''medical wing,'' used for human experimentation. And most shattering of all, I saw the desperate messages scratched on the walls of hideous cells next to the death chambers. Some of those messages appear to have been scribbled in excrement. I shuddered as I imagined the suffering endured by the forgotten victims of that terrible place -- the excruciating physical pain, the agony over loved ones left behind, the devastating sounds of executions conducted only a few feet from their cells. I could almost hear the screams of torture and soft whimpers of despair echo along the walls' unforgiving concrete.

New depths of depravity

Perhaps I am especially prone to feel empathy for Iraq's prisoners of conscience, for my grandfather was one of them. He and other leaders of the once large Iraqi Jewish community were arrested, paraded through the streets in leg irons and summarily jailed.

But my grandfather was comparatively fortunate, for he was imprisoned many years before Hussein took the country to new depths of depravity -- and after serving the prison sentence given him, my grandfather was released. Many of Hussein's prisoners were not so lucky. Iraqis unfortunate enough to be deemed ethnically or religiously undesirable, or who displayed the intolerable audacity of free thought, entered Hussein's prisons with the knowledge that they would never again see their loved ones.

In the twisted reality of the former Iraq, they may well have hoped never again to see their loved ones, for Hussein's regime was known to torture children in front of their parents. Whereas my grandfather was able to assuage his suffering by rejoining the people he loved most in this world, the victims of Hussein's apparatus of death could console themselves only by scrawling desperate messages on the walls of their cells.

It is the defeat of this sort of profanity that Hanukkah celebrates, for what can be more ungodly or profane than torture, mass murder and genocide? Such evil had been a staple of life in Iraq. But not anymore. We have come to banish darkness.

A gilded chair nearby

This Hanukkah in Baghdad, in a large and lavish building, the gentle glow of a Hanukkah lamp shimmered throughout a cavernous room. One of the objects caught in its radiance is a gilded chair that used to serve as the tyrant's throne, and the palace in which it sits used to be the capital building of his reign of terror. Today, the chair is empty, and the palace houses the apparatus of Iraqi reconstruction.

As my colleagues and I remember the Maccabee bravery of yesteryear and the resanctification of the Temple, we pray also for the brave and indefatigable people of Iraq, who day by day are rekindling their flames of hope and resanctifying their great land. They are banishing the darkness, and we wish them Godspeed.


© 2004 The Miami Herald and wire service sources. All Rights Reserved.
miami.com