Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JDN who wrote (519591)	1/5/2004 7:48:20 AM
From: E. T.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

"I wasnt there thus I cannot answer the question. jdn " Interesting, yet you say, "The FINEST MINDS at the time were implemented to select and interpret the various letters that ultimately went into what we call today the New Testament. I have no doubt that IT is as accurate as humanly possible to be." You are there for one thing and not another. You too could do a little historical research, lots of it is available. Sure, church leaders today want you to believe the new testament is a true reflection of Jesus's sayings, but the reality it is that it is not a complete reflection of Jesus's saying. But most importantly, remember because we originally were talking about John, John's Gospel may very well have been written by someone who never knew Jesus. Whereas Mark, does not fall under such a cloud, being written before 50 AD (20 years before the fall of the temple and never predicted in Mark) as opposed to about 90 to 100 AD when John is written. Of course, John writing after the fact, has Jesus predict the fall of the temple, lol.