To: Janice Shell who wrote (1162 ) 1/5/2004 8:40:06 PM From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell Respond to of 1397 Maybe she'd even bought something relatively heavy or bulky, and so accepted when someone offered her a lift. In this scenario, these additional items would have been left in her abductors' car. Jovin had just come from a dinner party this decreases the odds she decided to buy some items for dinner or a snack, especially at 9:30pm. If we assume she needed some items for general (later) use, then it would seem more logical she'd have either bought them while doing shopping for the party or when she had the car so she could transport them more easily. Since her apartment was three minutes away, I doubt she'd have needed or accepted a ride if asked. However, I do agree that perhaps she might have caught the attention of her eventual abductors while entering, exiting, or shopping at Krauszers. The problem would then be where their vehicle was parked and how to get Jovin to it, so, again, I'd rank this a lower probability than just walking by the vehicle. Krauszers had video surveillance with a tape that recycled, so had the police traced the Fresca to Krauszers earlier, they might have been able to seize the tape. As far as I know, they never checked receipts to see who might have bought a Fresca at around 9:30 that evening. If you're crazy enough to go on an improv killing spree, you're crazy enough to believe you'll get away with it. As in fact happened. The chances of anyone actually recognizing the abductors would have been very slim. Their real problem would have been the car's license plate, which someone might have written down. But I very much doubt that this was a violent abduction: if it had been, Jovin would immediately have dropped the Fresca bottle and whatever else she'd bought in order to fight off her attackers. Fear of license plate identification long ago led me to believe the van might have been stolen. Via the Freedom of Information Act I was able to obtain a list of all vehicles reported stolen or recovered around the date of the murder. Although the listing was vague (no makes, models, colors, etc.), none looked suspicious to me. It may well be the plates were stolen instead. As for whether someone accosted might have dropped a soda bottle, it's hard to say. If you kept your wits and decided to fight, of course you'd have dropped it. However, if you became numb with fear, as many people do, then you might have just followed orders in a daze. The position of the palm print on the bottle could offer some clues, however... btw, I forget: where was the bottle found? First off, I erred in saying it was a palm print. I just assumed that was why it was considered a partial print. So, I'm not really sure what part of the had was captured. As for the bottle position at the crime scene, it was just a few feet away from Jovin in the bushes that were further away (than her) from the road. Having seen the crime scene I'm going to say it's more consistent with being tossed there than dropped. Recall that the NHPD plunked down a copy of New Journal in front of Jim when they were interrogating him as if that was somehow supposed to jog his memory. We're guessing that it might have also been found at the crime scene. If so, it might imply the killers tossed out whatever belongings she had in the car, which then imply that's all the belongings she was carrying. - Jeff