SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (23076)1/5/2004 6:51:31 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793672
 
Jihad Crusaders
What an Osama bin Laden means by "crusade."

NRO
— Jonathan Riley-Smith is the author of many books on the crusades, including What Were the Crusades and The Oxford Illustrated History of the Crusades.


When Osama bin Laden and his followers refer, as they often do, to crusades and crusaders, they are not using language loosely. They are expressing a historical vision, an article of faith that has helped to provide moral justification for the actions of both Arab nationalists and radical Islamists.

It originated over a century ago, when the Turkish sultan and Sunni caliph, Abdulhamid II, publicized his conviction that the European powers, who had seized much of his territory and had engineered the "liberation" of other parts of his empire, had embarked on a new "crusade." In using this term, he was echoing romantic nonsense that had been washing around Europe, where many writers compared contemporary colonialism to crusading. But his language was taken up by the pan-Islamic press; the first Muslim history of the crusading movement, published in 1899, drew attention to the fact that "our most glorious sultan, Abdulhamid II, has rightly remarked that Europe is now carrying out a crusade against us in the form of a political campaign."

Up to this point, Muslims had looked back on the crusades with indifference and complacency. They felt that they had beaten the crusaders comprehensively, driving them from the Levant and occupying far more territory in the Balkans than the Westerners had ever held in Palestine and Syria. But as they began to take an interest in the historical parallels between contemporary and medieval Christian-Muslim interaction, they were confronted with Western rhetoric portraying contemporary empire builders as quasi-crusaders returning to complete the work their ancestors had begun. It was easy to gloss this with the view that Europe, having lost the first round in the crusades, had embarked on another. This struck a chord in Arab nationalism, which was beginning to emerge in response to the British and French occupations of much of North Africa and the Levant, and the settlement of Jews in Palestine.

Even before the First World War an Arab author, warning against the threat posed by Zionist settlement, had taken as a nom de plume the name of Saladin, who was being adopted as a model counter-crusader. A university named after Saladin was opened in Jerusalem in 1915, and as early as 1920 he was praised for thwarting the first European attempt to subdue the East. In 1934 a writer maintained that "the west is still waging crusading wars against Islam under the guise of political and economic imperialism." By the 1950s the creation of the state of Israel, established on the very ground occupied by the crusader kingdom of Jerusalem, was being portrayed as an act of vengeful malice. The Lebanese novelist Mahmoud Darwish, referring to the invasion of Lebanon by the Israelis in 1982, described them as "leftover crusaders" and their siege of Beirut as "revenge for all medieval history."

Since the 1970s Arab nationalism has been challenged by pan-Islamism, an ideology enshrining the unity of all Muslims dedicated to the worship of one God. Islamists anathematize the nationalists, but they have adopted their view of crusading, even though the Islamists recognize its ideological base, and have globalized it. Nationalists, on the other hand, see crusading as colonialist avarice masked by religion, and their vision underwrites an Arab struggle for freedom from colonial oppression. The Islamists maintain that the term "crusading" can be applied to any offensive — including a drive for economic or political hegemony — against Islam anywhere by Christians, and to any aggressive action by their surrogates, like Zionists (which is why the terms "European Crusading" and "Jewish Crusading" are interchangeable), or even Marxists. Indeed, "international Zionism" and "international Communism" are ideologies employed by the imperialism of the outside world to mask its "crusaderism." This explains why Mehmet Ali Agha, the Turk who tried to assassinate the Pope in 1981, could refer to John Paul II as "the supreme commander of the crusades."

Osama bin Laden's militant wing of Islamism is also inspired by a theory of jihad that demands turning inwards to purge Islam of infidels and heretics, renewing individual spirituality and creating a united, triumphant society dedicated to God. This is why Osama appears to be so emotional about infidel penetration, which, he believes, defiles Islam and particularly its holy places:

Our lord, the people of the cross had come with their horses (soldiers) and occupied the land of the two Holy Places (Mecca and Medina) and the Zionist Jews fiddle as they wish with the al-Aqsa mosque.
The Arabian Peninsula has never — since Allah made it flat, created its desert, and encircled it with seas — been stormed by any forces like the crusader armies, spreading in it like locusts, eating its riches and wiping out its plantations.... For over seven years the United States has been occupying the lands of Islam in the holiest of places, the Arabian Peninsula, plundering its riches, dictating to its rulers, humiliating its people, terrorizing its neighbors, and turning its bases in the Peninsula into a spearhead through which to fight the neighboring Muslim peoples.

To be found fighting under the sign of the cross are not only Christians, but also their surrogates, Jews, Marxists and secularists. And Afghanistan has been for decades a theatre of crusading warfare in a world-wide conflict.

This is a battle of Muslims against the global crusaders....God, who provided us with his support and kept us steadfast until the Soviet Union was defeated, is able to provide us once more with his support to defeat America on the same
land and with the same people.

In a war of civilizations, our goal is for our nation to unite in the face of the Christian crusade...This is a recurring war. The original crusade brought Richard (Lionheart) from Britain, Louis from France and Barbarossa from Germany. Today the crusading countries rushed as soon as Bush raised the cross. They accepted the rule of the cross.

It is this radical vision of crusade history which has suddenly and spectacularly forced itself on the outside world. Although merely a fantasy to the West, it finds expression in many Muslim societies. It is said that in mosques in Egypt, the word "crusader" has become a synonym for "Christian." In Indonesia last year, local preachers were referring to the dead at Bali in the same terms.

We are therefore confronted by a dangerous view of the past and of the present, moral as well as historical, shared by both Arab nationalists and Islamists. It has been spreading for a century and nothing has been done to counter it. Indeed, over and over again, in words and deeds, Westerners have thoughtlessly reinforced many Muslims' belief in it.


nationalreview.com



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (23076)1/5/2004 7:02:18 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793672
 
I have looked at quite of few of these ads. Missed this one. Gee, I wonder if Win "vetted" this ad? :>)


Ad Comparing Bush to Hitler Gets Heat

Monday, January 05, 2004

NEW YORK — What MoveOn.org wanted was for people to submit 30-second ads that were critical of President Bush, but what the liberal-leaning organization got was a controversy over one entry that compared Bush to Adolf Hitler (search ).

The ad in question used a tape recording of the Nazi leader speaking while it showed images of Hitler and German military prowess during World War II. At the end of the ad, a photo of Bush raising his hand to take the oath of office is seen.

"A nation warped by lies. Lies fuel fear. Fear fuels aggression. Invasion. Occupation. What were war crimes in 1945 is foreign policy in 2003," the ad said.

Republican groups and Jewish organizations expressed outrage over the ad, which has been removed from the MoveOn.org Web site. The Republican National Committee (search ) called on all nine Democratic candidates to condemn the ads.

RNC Chairman Ed Gillespie (search) called the ad, "the worst and most vile form of political hate speech."

MoveOn.org is "using the memory of that genocide as a political prop," American Jewish Congress President Jack Rosen (search) wrote in the Wall Street Journal on Monday, referring to the Holocaust.

"President Bush has shown us leadership in Iraq, and our troops have liberated a people who were oppressed by another murderous dictator … comparing the commander-in-chief of a democratic nation to the murderous tyrant Hitler is not only historically specious, it is morally outrageous," Rosen continued.

MoveOn.org spokesman Trevor Fitzgibbon said, "we had no idea the Hitler thing even existed."

The group, which claims to have a network of about 2 million online activists, said that the ad comparing Bush to Hitler was one of the 1,512 submissions from the general public submitted as part of a campaign called Bushin30seconds.com.

MoveOn.org claims the ad was not submitted by an organization and was ultimately removed from the Web site. MoveOn.org noted that the "Hitler" comparison was not among the 15 finalists that are now viewable on the Web.

The group argued that the RNC is making this an issue and it should not be held responsible for what was submitted to their contest by a private citizen, particularly since MoveOn.org itself apparently disavowed the ad.

Gillespie told Fox News that MoveOn.org will spend more than $1 million a day to support Bush's defeat in November and he said that the organization planned to spend $7 million to air whatever ad wins the organization's contest.

"That's the kind of tactics we're seeing on the left today in support of these Democratic presidential candidates," Gillespie said.

A panel of celebrity judges like actor Jack Black, Hollywood director Michael Moore, Democratic strategist Donna Brazile, director and author Gus Van Sant, musician Michael Stipe, comedienne Margaret Cho, actress Janeane Garofalo and musician Moby are supposed to pick the best entries.

MoveOn.org announced the finalists Monday afternoon. With over 2.9 million votes cast, the group said the final ads "perfectly capture the grassroots approach to politics we're pioneering together."

Bush in 30 Seconds Live, an awards show to celebrate the ads and announce the winner, will be held in the New York area Jan. 12.

Fox News' Carl Cameron and Liza Porteus contributed to this report.



Advertise on FOXNews.com
Jobs at FOX News Channel. Internships at FOX News Channel.
Terms of use. Privacy Statement. For FOXNews.com comments write to
foxnewsonline@foxnews.com; For FOX News Channel comments write to
comments@foxnews.com
© Associated Press. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2004 ComStock, Inc.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Copyright 2004 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved.
All market data delayed 20 minutes.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (23076)1/5/2004 7:43:32 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793672
 
I missed this article when it was run. John Burns seems to be on a mission to cover the crimes of Saddam. Which his paper is not too interested in. Good for him!

December 31, 2003 - New York Times
How Disappearance in '84 Blighted Family in Iraq
By JOHN F. BURNS

BAGHDAD, Iraq, Dec. 30 — A month after American troops occupied Baghdad, the family of Dr. Taki al-Moosawi was gathered at his Baghdad home, watching one of the Arab satellite channels that have become popular since the toppling of Saddam Hussein made it possible for any Iraqi, not just the ruling clique, to have satellite receivers.

And suddenly there it was: Old film clips of executions looted from the archives of the General Security Directorate, the most powerful of Mr. Hussein's secret police agencies. There, too, in the last terrifying moments before he was blown apart by a grenade his executioners had taped onto his chest, was the nephew who had disappeared without trace more than 18 years before, Mehdi Salih al-Moosawi.

When the secret police came for him and other males in the family in December 1984, Mehdi was a quiet 22-year-old student at a Baghdad technical college, a karate champion just back from service as an infantryman in the Iran-Iraq war, the father of two infant children.

He was accused, along with Dr. Moosawi, of planting bombs in Karamanah Square in Baghdad, though Dr. Moosawi says that the charge was false and that the real offense was speaking, among friends, in ways that were critical of Mr. Hussein.

In all the years since Mehdi's arrest, there had been no rest in the search for his nephew by Dr. Moosawi, a British-trained physiologist. The doctor himself was released after several months, on the intervention of an acquaintance who was a cousin of Mr. Hussein, but he was haunted, he says now, by the anguish of having left Mehdi in the dungeons of the secret police headquarters in central Baghdad.

When he saw the tape on Al Jazeera, an Arab station that has frequently been criticized for whitewashing Mr. Hussein's rule, Dr. Moosawi said, he was overcome with anger and disgust, as well as shame that it had been Mehdi who died, not him. He also felt at that moment, he said, that any price Iraqis paid for the overthrow of Mr. Hussein, including the ravages of the American invasion, had been worth it.

"In my own mind, I was already dead from the moment that Mehdi disappeared," he said. "I wished only that it could have been me, sitting there in the desert. Only later on, when I remembered that the Americans had come here to end this terror, did I begin to think, well, we were all dead, but we have been resurrected, we have been born again."

What happened to Mehdi, and what became of his family as they balanced their quest for him with a relentless theater of fealty to Mr. Hussein, is a grim — and grimly familiar — parable of the terror inflicted on 25 million Iraqis during the 24 years of Mr. Hussein's rule.

The critical view the family now takes of the American-led occupation may also hold clues for the United States as it confronts a brutal insurgency and grapples for some formula that will bring American troops home.

"They did a very good job for America and for Iraq in getting rid of Saddam, and we thank them," Dr. Moosawi said. "Now, they are young boys lost in a foreign country, and every day there is a bomb in the road. They live a terrible time. So please tell them, we would like that they would leave our country as soon as possible, as soon as they have arranged a stable government to replace Saddam."

Dr. Moosawi embodies much of what America has brought to Iraq. On the instruction of American officials, all 63 of Iraq's universities and technical colleges held elections this summer for presidents, vice presidents and deans; Dr. Moosawi, once a pariah among his colleagues because of the taint he bore from his brush with the secret police, is now vice president of Mustansiriya University, a proud if dilapidated institution in Baghdad that was founded by one of the ruling caliphs of the Islamic world in the 13th century.

Through all the years of the search for Mehdi, the family's hopes had been sustained by contacts with a senior officer in the mukhabarat, one of the prime agencies in Mr. Hussein's constellation of secret police agencies, which exacted money from the family, saying it would buy food, clothes and medicine for Mehdi in an undisclosed prison. It was a deceit of a kind that became common as Mr. Hussein's government came ever more to resemble an entrenched mafia whose brutality and greed metamorphosed into unrelenting terror.

The Moosawis suffered as grievously as any other from that murderous terror, Dr. Moosawi said, listing 9 members of the extended family who were executed under Mr. Hussein, and 30 others who are still missing, presumed dead, after being taken away by the dictator's enforcers.

Yet nothing had prepared the family for seeing the horror of Mehdi's end in the secret police film, which is available on a compact disk that sells on handcarts in bazaars all over Iraq. Dr. Moosawi, 50, hands copies of the CD to visitors to his university office, although he says he and most other members of the family, including Mehdi's father, Salih, and his mother, Zeineb, have never been able to watch through to the film's dismal end.

The CD shows Mehdi, sometime in 1985, emerging with two other young men from a white van, at what is said by the narrator to be an execution site in the flat, hot desert outside Baghdad. Their hands are bound behind their backs, and they have rags, in Mehdi's case a green bandanna, for blindfolds.

A group of men led by Ali Hasan al-Majid — Mr. Hussein's cousin, known as Chemical Ali for his role as commander of Iraqi forces that used chemical weapons to attack a Kurdish town, Halabja, in 1988 — stand at ease, cheering and clapping as the death sentences are read.

But these, it quickly becomes clear, are to be no routine deaths. The revolutionary court has condemned the three young men to hanging, the narrator says, because of their complicity in bombings that killed many people, including "women and children," in Baghdad. But President Hussein has ordered an exemplary punishment: that the condemned will be "blown to pieces," the narrator says, quoting from the document being read to the men in the desert.

One by one, the men are led forward to a mound of earth bulldozed as a sort of blast shield, and forced to sit down, cross-legged, on the ground. A man wearing a watch with Mr. Hussein's face on the dial then approaches, slips a grenade into the breast pocket of each of the victims, then closes the pocket by securing it with white medical tape. A wire runs back toward the execution party, linked to a battery and a detonator.

Each of the first two men is blown apart within seconds, their dismembered bodies lying in the fold of the earthen mound as Mehdi, in a brown track suit top, is led forward to his end. As the grenade is fixed and the tape secured, his bandanna, around the lower part of his face, slips further. Moments before the end, he looks up to his left, a slight, lightly moustached young man with a look of terror in his eyes, and says four or five words to the man leaning over him. On the tape, the words are indecipherable.

Then the detonator is pressed, and Mehdi disappears in a cloud of smoke and dust. The execution party walks away, led by Mr. Majid, laughing and congratulating each other. Mr. Majid, who later commanded troops who occupied Kuwait in August 1990, is now a prisoner himself, captured by American troops in Mosul in August. He was No. 5 on the list of 55 "most wanted" members of Mr. Hussein's leadership, and is likely to be among those, along with Mr. Hussein, who was captured himself on Dec. 13, who will face war crimes trials before Iraqi courts.

In the Dungeon

After 19 Years, Memory Still Stuns

Dr. Moosawi is a busy man these days. In his outer office at Mustansiriya University sits an American-trained Iraqi bodyguard with a pistol in his waistband, surrounded by dozens of petitioners seeking dormitory rooms, jobs as teachers and guards, scholarships and other favors that Dr. Moosawi can grant as the university's chief administrator. He also supervises postgraduate students in physiology at the medical school.

By his own account he is a quiet man, scion of a prominent Iraqi Shiite family respected for lineal ties that reach back to the Prophet Muhammad, and to a school of Islam that emphasizes tolerance, humanity and progress.

But when he sat down to tell Mehdi's story, and his own, he appeared to move into another world, speaking in a monotone that continued for two hours and more at a time, without interruptions from others in the room, without inflection or overt sign of emotion beside a gaze fixed on the carpet and the occasional wringing of his hands.

His descent into the gulag began at the University of Dundee, in Scotland, where he completed his doctorate between 1977 and 1984. They were years that bracketed Mr. Hussein's ascent to the presidency in 1979, and the Iraqi attack that began the war with Iran in 1980, leading by 1988 to a million dead on the two sides. As Dr. Moosawi told it, he left an Iraq at peace, in the middle of an oil boom that financed great progress in education, medicine and other fields, and returned on holiday in 1981 to a nightmare.

"I had a problem with Saddam right from the start," he said, speaking in a sometimes rusty, slightly Scottish-inflected English. "There were all those wounded people from the war, with no medical attention at all. There was no care for the families of the soldiers killed. On the radio, there were these songs with words that talked of the war as your lover. I was confused. War means killing, war means death. How can it be your lover?

"Everything had changed. The attitude was, 'Either you are fighting, or you are not an Iraqi citizen.' Everything was military, and everywhere the color was khaki. All your friends were in the army, or the people's militia. A lot of bad habits had been initiated among the ordinary people, like cheating, telling lies and spying. Schoolchildren were encouraged to spy on their parents, and wives on their husbands, and of course this led to the destruction of the family."

Back in Scotland, Dr. Moosawi spoke to fellow Iraqi students of his contempt for Mr. Hussein. Then, in June 1984, he returned to Iraq.

The first sign of trouble came when the Health Ministry refused to certify his Ph.D., barring him from working. Then, in December 1984, he said, 50 armed men from the secret police burst into the home of his older brother, Salih al-Moosawi, Mehdi's father, and arrested the two brothers, a cousin and two of Dr. Moosawi's nephews, one of them Mehdi.

His vision blinded by blackened, wraparound glasses, Dr. Moosawi said, he was driven to the General Security Directorate, which was then scattered around a score of old buildings in one of Baghdad's most historic sections and known as the White Palace, after a porticoed mansion once owned by a queen of Iraq. Long ago the houses had been owned by Jewish merchants; by the 1980's, the Jews were all gone, and the mansions had been converted to interrogation centers.

"They said, 'All of you have to be executed; all of you have to be destroyed,' " Dr. Moosawi said. " 'None of your family has to stay alive.'

"Before we got in the car, a very bad man pointed his gun at me and said, `You are to be killed now.' An officer came out and said, `What are you doing?' and he said, `He swore against Saddam Hussein.'

"It was not true, of course. The officer told the man to put his gun away."

At the interrogation center, the men were taken down stairs into a pitch-black basement, then separated. Dr. Moosawi's cell was just large enough for one man to sit, and two to stand, with an earthhole in the corner for a toilet. Mehdi was taken to another cell, and never seen again. It was bitterly cold and damp, Dr. Moosawi said, and women could be heard weeping somewhere in the dark.

Weeks passed, then months. Between interrogation sessions, the only contact with guards was when bread crusts were thrown into the cell.

"We didn't know if it was night or day," Dr. Moosawi said. "I told my nephew and my cousin, 'This is the time of our death, and we have to be patient, and strong.' "

Guards taunted them. "They said, 'Well, you are a doctor,' " he recalled. "I said, 'Yes,' and they laughed and said: 'Forget about it. It's all over for you. You will be buried here.' "

Finally, he was taken from the cell, up the stairs and into the presence of an officer, who told Dr. Moosawi he was to be released.

"Up the stairs I saw something I had forgotten, the sunlight," he said. "I thought, they will drive me to another place of execution. I said to the officer: 'Would you do me a favor, please: execute me here. I don't want to wait.' And he said: 'Dr. Taki, you are my friend. Honestly, you will not be executed. You are free.' "

Later, Dr. Moosawi learned that an Iraqi he had met in Britain — a cousin of Mr. Hussein's, though Dr. Moosawi says he did not know that — had visited his Baghdad home by chance, learned of his arrest, and intervened to have him released. Also freed were Mehdi's father and the two other men, but not Mehdi. Dr. Moosawi's name was placed on the secret police's special watch list of potential traitors.

After the Dungeon

A Time of Searching, a Time of Hate

At home Dr. Moosawi found the women in black, mourning men they had presumed lost forever. Remembering that, he paused, and wept silently into a handkerchief. After a full minute, he resumed.

Eventually, Dr. Moosawi got a job teaching at Mustransiriya, but colleagues avoided him. Friends stopped contacting his family, except for a few who came late at night or telephoned using false names.

Payments were made to the secret police officer who promised to look after Mehdi. But asking about his whereabouts, at secret police headquarters and prisons, was dangerous. "We'd say, 'Give him to us, and let us have a gun, and we will kill him,' " Dr. Moosawi said. "Of course, it was a lie."

Another war came in 1991, after the Iraqi seizure of Kuwait, and Mr. Hussein's grip tightened still further. Economic conditions worsened under the United Nations sanctions imposed after the Kuwait invasion. Virtually the whole economy turned into a black market, controlled by Mr. Hussein and two of his sons. By the mid-1990's, with the Iraqi currency thoroughly devalued, Dr. Moosawi's salary as a full professor came to be worth barely $2 a month.

But he had something most Iraqis did not: a certain immunity to fear.

"I had learned, No. 1, that I wasn't afraid of death; No. 2, that I wasn't afraid of a hard life," he said. "I'd seen the worst, and I believed I should give as much as I can. I worked day and night at the medical school, and tried not to think about anything else."

A marked feature of Dr. Moosawi's account was that for long periods he barely mentioned the name of the fallen dictator, as though unwilling to invoke it.

Now, nine months after the American occupation began, mass graves are being exhumed all across the country, and charges of war crimes and genocide weighed against Mr. Hussein, whose secret police, by estimates of Iraqi human rights groups, may have killed 300,000 to one million Iraqis.

Though American troops captured Mr. Hussein in a bunker near Tikrit, many Iraqis say privately that he still casts a long shadow, and that his loyalists, insurgents now, can still strike with ambushes, assassinations and roadside bombs. Dr. Moosawi said any killer could enter his office in the throng of petitioners, and that, for his family's sake, he should be careful when saying anything about Mr. Hussein.

Still, the picture he painted of Iraq's last years under the dictator suggested that Mr. Hussein's psychological hold on Iraqis, through the terror, had eroded fast after the 1991 war over Kuwait.

"If you had come to me and asked me about Saddam Hussein a year ago, I would have told you that he was a hero, that the Iraqi people love him," Dr. Moosawi said, "because if I tell you the truth I'll be finished. They will kill me."

But secretly, Dr. Moosawi said, Iraqis had decided, after Kuwait, that the dictator had to go. "After the war with Iran ended, with nothing gained and everything lost, people thought Saddam would become like a priest, that he would pay for what he had done by becoming a very good man. Then, in two years, he attacked Kuwait, and even people who had doubted it understood that the government of Saddam was against the people."

Secretly, Dr. Moosawi said, he began meeting with others at the university, forming the nucleus of a group of intellectuals who have since formed a society to work for a re-birth of Iraq. At home, a year ago, he and his family watched the drumbeat of yet another approaching war, this time with the Americans coming to overthrow Mr. Hussein.

Their fear, he said, was that President Bush would compromise with Mr. Hussein at the last moment, giving him a reprieve of the kind he gained when American troops stopped at the Iraqi border in 1991.

"We wished that Saddam would leave without a war, but unfortunately this didn't happen," Dr. Moosawi said. "So we Iraqis came to a place where we said, 'We will have to sacrifice something to have our freedom,' and the war fought by the Americans was the price."

When American advance columns arrived in Baghdad on April 9, he said, and appeared on television assisting in the toppling of Mr. Hussein's statue in Firdos Square, there was joy among the Moosawis that there had not been since Mehdi disappeared.

"I went to my brother to congratulate him", he said, speaking of Salih, Mehdi's father. "It was like we were dreaming. There were tears and smiles. Everybody was laughing and crying."

But in the months since, the mood among the Moosawis has soured, and not only because of the bitterness of learning, after weeks of visiting virtually every secret police station in Iraq, and scanning lists of political prisoners posted on lampposts and trees, that Mehdi would not be coming back. The Americans, Dr. Moosawi said, have failed the high expectations of Iraqis and have sunk so low in popularity that most cannot wait to see them go home.

"It is freedom the Americans have given us, but it is not good freedom," he said. "Yes, we wanted freedom against dictatorship, truth against lies, education and progress instead of pushing the intelligentsia down. But what have we got? There is no law, we live in the dark without electricity, there are no police to stop the thieves, nobody to control the traffic, no gasoline.

"In those respects, we say, 'Things were better under Saddam.' "

Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (23076)1/6/2004 4:24:08 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793672
 
Here's a ME Dictatorship we will continue to support.


Egypt Muzzles Calls for Democracy
Reformers Say Billions in U.S. Aid Prop Up Authoritarian Rule

By Glenn Frankel
Washington Post Foreign Service
Tuesday, January 6, 2004; Page A01

CAIRO -- The atmosphere in Courtroom 5 was relaxed, even cordial, as Ashraf Ibrahim entered the defendants' cage. While a dozen black-bereted policemen looked on impassively, friends and relatives took turns chatting with the 35-year-old computer programmer, a political activist, who was dressed in a white prison jumpsuit. Some even posed for photographs. Men in grease-stained waiter's jackets navigated the packed room selling soft drinks and snacks, delivering Ibrahim a steaming glass of tea through a small hole gouged out of the steel mesh between the iron bars.

Then the judge and prosecutors entered, and the room seemed to freeze.

Ashraf Ibrahim and four fugitive co-defendants, the chief prosecutor read aloud, were in court this December morning to face charges of plotting to overthrow the government, belonging to a banned communist organization and sending false reports to international organizations -- offenses punishable by up to 15 years' imprisonment under Egypt's harsh state security laws.

After the judge rejected a defense attorney's plea that his client should be freed on bail because he had done nothing more than videotape police brutality at a demonstration, Ibrahim was dispatched back to his cell in Cairo's notorious Mahkoum Tora security prison, where he has been held since April.

In what was widely regarded as one of his most important speeches of 2003, President Bush proclaimed in November that it was time for the United States to support democracy in the Middle East. He said the establishment of a free Iraq would be "a watershed event in the global democratic revolution." And he called upon Egypt, the Arab world's most populous country and the second-biggest recipient of U.S. military and economic aid, to be in the vanguard.

"The great and proud nation of Egypt has shown the way toward peace in the Middle East, and now should show the way toward democracy in the Middle East," Bush declared.

U.S. officials insist they are seeing slow but positive changes in human rights conditions here. But rights advocates, opposition politicians and analysts interviewed here paint a darker portrait: of an authoritarian government that tightens or loosens the screws of repression depending upon how it perceives threats, that is obsessed with its Islamic opposition and feels harassed by human rights activists, and that wields a powerful state security apparatus that operates under far-reaching emergency laws and often deals brutally with opponents.

And they contend that, contrary to Bush's pronouncements, U.S. aid -- nearly $2 billion per year over the past two decades -- has propped up an unpopular government, its army and police, and helped suppress democracy.

Once the most influential Arab nation, Egypt has struggled in recent decades with a stagnant economy, political violence from Islamic militants and the vicissitudes of highly centralized one-man rule. Its president, Hosni Mubarak, is 75 and has showed signs of ill health recently, and he is grooming his son to succeed him.

Opponents are hoping the succession will be an opportunity to transform the government and the economy, and some critics agree that the government has eased its grip on dissent. But state power is quick to assert itself when challenged. Ashraf Ibrahim and his supporters in Egypt's small but vocal human rights community say the real reason he was arrested was because he helped organize raucous demonstrations in March against the war in Iraq that were far larger than anyone had anticipated and had shaken and embarrassed the authorities. "They didn't expect so many people," Ibrahim said in a brief interview before the proceeding began. "That's why they want to punish us now."

In a Big Prison

On Nov. 6, the day Bush gave his speech, authorities returned the bruised body of Saad Sayed Qutb, a 43-year-old accountant, to his family. Qutb, a member of the banned Muslim Brotherhood, died in a local hospital after three days in custody. The Brotherhood accused authorities of torture, making Qutb the 14th alleged torture victim to die in Egyptian jails in the past two years.

"How could anyone in Egypt believe what Bush said?" asked Essam Erian, a leader of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Sudden disappearances and brutal interrogations are one way the government deals with dissidents, according to activists. Another is to keep them on edge about their legal status. The Brotherhood is the foremost Islamic political movement here and, like all religious groups, it is banned from entering parliamentary politics, although 17 of its followers serve as independents. For years it has operated through a network of mosques, charitable institutions, labor unions and professional associations. Sometimes the authorities crack down on the Brotherhood; other times they encourage its participation.

Erian, a clinical pathologist by trade, frequently appears on television to speak for the movement. He spent five years in prison in the mid-1990s -- a time when the government virtually decapitated the Brotherhood by imprisoning some of its most promising younger leaders -- and said he knows he could be arrested again at any time. "I came out of a small prison, now I'm in a big one," he said.

There are constant reminders of the limits under which Erian lives. He was scheduled last month to attend a conference in Kuwait City, hosted by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, on Middle Eastern democracy and the role of Islamic groups. Egypt refused to allow him to leave the country and Kuwait rejected his request for a visa. "I was banned by both countries from speaking about democracy," he said.

The influence of the Brotherhood, founded in the 1920s, can be found throughout the Muslim world. Its leaders insist they are committed to nonviolence and democracy, but the group has long been the breeding ground for more radical factions, including the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, which became a central component of Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network. Egyptian Islamic Jihad waged a holy war against the state in the early 1990s. Militants attacked police stations, banks, hotels and government offices, assassinating scores of policemen and officials. The climax was the massacre of 62 people, most of them foreign tourists, in Luxor in 1997.

The government responded with a harsh crackdown, killing hundreds of fighters and arresting thousands more. Torture was widespread, according to Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International. Backed by $1.3 billion in annual military aid from the United States, the security forces eventually prevailed. A senior Egyptian official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the trauma still affects the way the government deals with political dissent.

"What we do not want is a situation where the fundamentalists could come to power," he said. "We are trying to strike a balance between reform and security. The human rights situation is gradually improving, although perhaps not as fast or as far as some people would like."

Hafez Abu Saada has a $40,000 dilemma. The head of the Egyptian Organization for Human Rights received a grant from the U.S. government-funded National Endowment for Democracy in July to help his group monitor rights abuses here and produce its annual report. It is a big chunk of his annual budget of $100,000, but Abu Saada needs approval from the Ministry of Social Affairs before he can touch the money.

Six months have passed with no word. If Abu Saada taps the funds, he and his board of directors could face six months in jail. It's no idle threat: Five years ago Abu Saada was arrested, held for a week and charged with receiving money from foreign sources in order to defame Egypt's international reputation. He was never tried, but the charges could be reinstated at any time, he said.

"One of the goals of the government is to always keep you under pressure," Abu Saada said. "You learn to live with it."

An Egyptian Canary

Groups like Abu Saada's do not have widespread popular support here, but they serve as a sort of canary in the Egyptian mine shaft -- when the atmosphere turns more repressive, they are usually the first to feel it.

In recent years, critics acknowledge, the government has allowed an increased level of public debate and dissent. But as always, there are strings attached. Last year, officials enacted legislation requiring registration of all nongovernmental organizations and giving the Social Affairs Ministry the power to put any group out of business by rejecting its registration.

Two groups -- the New Women's Research Center and the Land Center for Human Rights -- have been rejected. Aida Seif El Dawla, a psychiatrist and human rights activist who helped found the women's center, said the ministry had ruled that the center was a threat to public order because it planned to lobby lawmakers to allow victims of torture or domestic abuse to sue their tormentors. "The public order is obviously very fragile," she said.

In facing a government with such broad powers, it doesn't always help to win in court. Saad Eddin Ibrahim, a democracy advocate, won a stunning legal victory last year when a judge overturned his conviction and that of the staff of his Ibn Khaldun Center for Development Studies on charges he had embezzled money, received foreign funds without permission and tarnished Egypt's image.

But while the case is finished, the government's campaign against him is not. In recent weeks, Ibrahim has come under a vitriolic attack in the Egyptian press. Newspapers have accused him of conspiring with the Bush administration to undermine Egypt's international image. "Saad Eddin Ibrahim in Washington to incite against Egypt and the Arab World" read one front-page headline.

The newspapers also said Ibrahim -- who holds joint U.S.-Egyptian citizenship -- had received $2 million from U.S. aid funds earmarked for Egypt as a payoff for his betrayal. At least four members of the Ibn Khaldun board have resigned in recent weeks. Some of Ibrahim's old allies in the human rights movement are quietly distancing themselves from his cause, fearing he has grown too close to the United States.

Government officials contend they have no role in the press reports, but Ibrahim said he believes elements in the state security forces are orchestrating a campaign of character assassination. And he fears he may become a target for far worse. When in prison, he met inmates who had been convicted of the attempted assassination of Naguib Mahfouz, the Nobel Prize-winning novelist, in 1994.

"They told me they had not read a line by Mahfouz but they were incited, told he was against Islam, he was a heretic or a traitor," Ibrahim said. "And now I'm called a traitor. These things cannot be taken lightly."

One newspaper accused Ibrahim of writing Bush's Nov. 6 address on democracy, while another claimed the speech was inspired by Israel and its American supporters in order to undermine Egypt and other Arab states.

Anger Over Iraq War

Virtually all of the two dozen independent analysts, government officials, lawyers and journalists interviewed here in December were deeply angry about the U.S. occupation of Iraq, as well as the Bush administration's unflagging support for Israel. Few said they believed Bush truly wants democratic elections here, which would inevitably produce a government far more hostile to U.S. foreign policy than the current one. Several pointed to the U.S. practice of "rendition" -- the surreptitious shipment of an unknown number of suspected Arab terrorists to Egypt and other countries where police routinely practice torture -- as proof of U.S. bad faith on human rights issues.

Egyptian officials, who have always wielded a veto over which private organizations are allowed to receive U.S. aid, are unhappy about an American proposal to earmark $20 million for democratization. Mubarak, at a news conference, insisted that Egypt was the region's only real democratic state. "We do not need any pressure from anyone to adopt democratic principles," he declared.

The first day of the antiwar demonstrations last March was largely peaceful. But things got out of control the next afternoon, when thousands of worshipers poured out of the 1,000-year-old al-Azhar mosque after Friday prayers, chanting slogans and throwing stones and shoes at riot police. The police used long narrow clubs and metal pipes to beat back the crowd. More than 800 people were arrested and hundreds more were beaten, including two opposition lawmakers. Someone set a firetruck ablaze under the 6th of October Bridge, stopping traffic and causing panic on the bridge.

The protests were estimated to be the largest in this country since the bread riots of 1977, and they brought to the surface popular disaffection with the government. Demonstrators chanted against Mubarak and his family, as well as the United States and Israel. Ashraf Ibrahim, who for the past three years had been organizing small but vocal demonstrations on behalf of the Palestinian uprising, said he was stunned by the size of the crowd. He used his video camera to record scenes of police brutality.

Three weeks later, the authorities struck back, raiding Ibrahim's home and confiscating his computer and video camera, and arresting a dozen activists. Ibrahim, who was away at the time, turned himself in when he returned in mid-April. He has been held ever since.

'I Was Only Talking'

At his hearing Dec. 6 in the southern district of Cairo courthouse, Ibrahim was represented by Abu Saada and human rights advocate Ahmed Seif El Islam. Many of the stalwarts of the rights community came to observe, including Seif Dawla and representatives of Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, as did a handful of Western diplomats, among them a representative of the U.S. Embassy.

Looking at the crowded courtroom from the defendants' cage, Ibrahim expressed gratification -- and amazement that the government had singled him out for punishment.

"I am not a terrorist," he said. "I was only talking." Maybe, he added with a shy smile, "that is why they are afraid of me."

© 2004 The Washington Post Company