Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Winter in the Great White North -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (5439)	1/6/2004 10:46:11 PM
From: ralfph	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 8273

Hong yip yow - I know it is totaly politicaly incorrect but I am going to say it any way. I love the names some of those furiners have. Many are enough to put a smile on a guys face. Hong Yip Yow sounds like the hero in a childrens book. My keyboard really got trashed. It was creating symbols I had never seen before. Every time I hit the dot button I got some friggin down load to pop up. very strange. SUR- That one really hurt. WM-how about that Liz likes it. SWM- I was the idiot on the bid at 32 yesterday. I could not be bothered trying to place one with my busted keyboard this morning. TK- quiet move or base seems to be forming. It still has nothing in it that I am nutso over. JDU- its about time I looked at this one again. INM- Drilling in Februrary. ECU- holly cow batman. - This one has to be one of the great Sleeper stocks of 2003. If it breaks a buck this year that will be one heck of a ride for some. ORM- firming up while drilling is underway. CPT- zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. But it is a firm zzzzz. A quality ZZZZZ. Wildcat- this is the year. Period . Ec is going to turn over every darn stone and callin every marker he can to get a mine going. And if he does not get it rolling he will never write a mining article again or tell us how to get the job done . <GGG> I hear the insiders of Wildcat are so upbeat about the move into the public domain that they have a secret handshake. gotta run ralfph

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (5439)	1/8/2004 3:39:37 PM
From: marcos	Respond to of 8273

Here is why the Powers That Be could soon require identification of both parties in all gold transactions - 'WASHINGTON (AP) -- Authorities filed criminal charges Thursday against one of the largest gold refiners in the United States, accusing the company of participating in an illegal, $4.5 million money-laundering operation involving tainted gold from South America for at least four months. Prosecutors charged Metalor USA Refining Corp. of North Attleboro, Mass. ....' biz.yahoo.com It is the natural inclination of governments to want more information on the individual, under legislation like RICO and anti-terrorism etc they will of course demand it .... i've always wondered why drug-money launderers don't go into the 'gold-mining' business, turn some marginal operation into a money-maker with steady additions of bullion into the 'ore' ..... this probably happens already, in additions to placer gold which is widely bought/sold all over SA .... net effect to us will be loss of privacy, and of a major advantage gold has always had