Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert E. Hall who wrote (36233)	1/7/2004 2:20:25 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39621

Robert. Why am I getting the impression that you are being evasive. In fact you did not answer my second post. Go to your reply and click on the post reference beside my name. You will be taken to my first post. I did not mention predestination in my second post and yet you repeated your fist answer in saying that you were glad I enjoyed the book. It's really not a big deal, but lets be honest with one another. I pointed out some "problems" with what you are saying and you point me to some rambling posts by somebody else? "What he said" is hardly a sufficient response to the issues I brought up in my second post. Col 2:9 indicates quite clearly that Christ still resided in the same body that He was raised in, at the time that Colossians was written. Christ was raised in the same physical body that was crucified. Do you deny this? If not how did he return without His body? Were the dead raised physically in 70 A.D.? Your position on predestination is irrelevant to the issue of Christ's resurrection. Denying the bodily resurrection makes you a non-Christian