SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neeka who wrote (23465)1/8/2004 4:32:05 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793721
 
Harkin plays Hamlet

To Endorse or Not to Endorse? An Iowa Power Broker Is Torn
By CARL HULSE

CUMMING, Iowa, Jan. 6 — The most sought-after Democratic caucus-goer in Iowa is agonizing in this hamlet of 150, torn over whether to make what could be the most important endorsement in the state's still shifting presidential contest.

"As we sit here right now, I honestly don't know what I'm going to do," said Senator Tom Harkin, whose support, in Iowa at least, has the potential to vastly overshadow endorsements by Al Gore, Bill Bradley or just about anyone else. "I am being pulled in a couple of different ways. I may not endorse anyone. I may just let it all play out."

But that outcome could be personally unsatisfying for Mr. Harkin, who has played caucus power broker in the past and won the voting in his own unsuccessful presidential bid in 1992. After all, what is the point of having a nationally significant political event in his home state if he cannot flex his substantial muscle?

"Tom, being Tom, loves to campaign and he wants to do whatever he can to see a Democrat in the White House," said Lorraine Voles, a former adviser who remains close to the senator. "I think he starts looking at the options out there."

It is a tricky business for Mr. Harkin, who has political allies sprinkled throughout the campaigns of the top contenders, longtime relationships with several of the candidates and a burning desire to make certain he is central to the political life of his state. His deliberations are front-page news in Des Moines, the campaigns have been calling, and the days are slipping by toward the Jan. 19 caucuses.

As he contemplates what to do, he can be found in the small, refurbished house he was born in here on the rural outskirts of Des Moines. From his living room, he can look out at the snow-covered cornfields, spin tales about local bootleg rye whiskey, show off his favorite shotguns and take aim at his next move.

The thinking is that if Mr. Harkin does make a public choice, it is likely to be Howard Dean, whose current take-no-prisoners brand of Democratic politics resembles Mr. Harkin's own populist style. Mr. Harkin acknowledges being "intrigued" by the former Vermont governor.

"It has been impressive what he has done," said Mr. Harkin, who invoked a late friend and fellow liberal in the Senate."Paul Wellstone and I always knew that if we continue to compete with the Republicans for the same shrinking pool of voters, we will lose. We have to expand that pool and Dean is doing that."

Dr. Dean, like any of the caucus competitors, would be thrilled with a Harkin stamp of approval, said his campaign manager, Joe Trippi. "It's pretty clear in Iowa that every candidate would love to have Senator Harkin's endorsement," Mr. Trippi said.

An endorsement of Dr. Dean would be a blow to the campaign of Representative Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri, who is relying on support from the same labor unions that are close to Mr. Harkin. Advisers to Mr. Gephardt concede it would not be good news but say that such a move at this late stage would probably limit the influence of Mr. Harkin's extensive organizational network.

For the other campaigns, their best hope may be that Mr. Harkin simply stays out of it. Sometimes, it is easy to forget that Mr. Harkin himself is not in the race, because most of the candidates slip a flattering reference to the lawmaker or his policies into their remarks at rallies, hoping to strike a bond with Iowans while currying favor with Mr. Harkin.

There is no doubt that his endorsement would be a significant development and could swing some voters.

"Harkin is the key state Democrat here," said Dennis Goldford, a professor at Drake University. "He does carry some weight."

His backing of Mr. Gore was credited with helping the vice president defeat Mr. Bradley in the 2000 caucuses. And Mr. Harkin sought early to carve out a role in the 2004 caucuses by being host at a series of 10 "Hear it from the Heartland" candidate forums and a steak fry that were treated as don't-miss events by the contenders last year. But no endorsement ensued, even though Mr. Harkin said his own neighbors were asking him for guidance.

Though he said he came close to announcing a choice in the last few days, Mr. Harkin is being urged by some of his chief advisers to stay neutral in the contest, as is another prominent Democrat, Gov. Tom Vilsack. The governor has indicated he would not announce a preference to maintain an aura of openness around the caucuses and to help Iowa keep its first-in-the-nation status.

"There is something to be said for that," said Mr. Harkin, who is clearly finding it difficult to be on the sidelines. "But there is something to be said for the fact that we are political leaders, aren't we? There are a lot of undecided Democrats who are out there calling me and wondering what to do."

Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company



To: Neeka who wrote (23465)1/8/2004 8:32:31 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793721
 
I love to think of Waxman sweeping the floor around DeLay's new Buick. He looks just like the actor in that old ad.

The absolute best part of dynamic is the reduction of Henry Waxman to the status of third-tier cable guest.

Majority Party
The Texas redistricting decision is going to make it tough sledding for the Democrats to take back the House.
by Hugh Hewitt
Weekly Standard

NANCY PELOSI was upset after the federal appeals court upheld the new congressional districting map for the Lone Star State Tuesday: "This is just the latest attempt by President Bush, Tom Delay, and other Republicans to dismantle the Voting Rights Act. The Texas redistricting plan shows once again that when Republicans cannot win elections fair and square, they rig the rules."

Then Pelosi went Alamo: "We will fight to the finish for Texas."

That's a wonderful image: The hyper-lefty from San Francisco leading a crusade to turn Texas into a Democratic state. I hope someone brings a video camera. Sore loser rhetoric, of course, but amusing in the extreme considering that the redistricting battle has always been about undoing a deeply unfair incumbent protection plan cooked up by judges that saddled overwhelmingly Republican Texas with a Democratic majority in its Congressional delegation. What's lovely to watch is the attempt by the suddenly soon-to-be-retired Texas Democrats to hang their outrage on the Voting Rights Act.

Martin Frost, a now very endangered Texas Democrat, hit the highest note: "The real victims are some 3.6 million Hispanics and African-Americans in Texas, and minority Americans across the nation whose fundamental voting rights will no longer be protected by federal law if the U.S. Supreme Court allows this radical, dangerous, and far-reaching decision to stand."

The immediate political consequences of the new Texas map aren't getting enough study because of their inside-baseball nature. (It is an essay for another day how such self-serving rhetoric encourages minority communities to indulge in victim-think.)

The new map locks the current Republican domination of the House into place at least until 2012 and probably until 2022. It is hard to see where Democrats can find a population trend sufficiently large to undo the 30 to 40 seat margin the GOP should have after the dust clears in November.

K Street has done the math by now, and expect the checks to continue flowing to the victors and to increase in velocity and size. Republicans remember well what it was like to be the distinct minority in the House without a prayer of majority status. The lean years are coming to the House Democrats, and they won't be limited to seven. As a result, expect more retirements from the aging warriors of the left. The absolute best part of dynamic is the reduction of Henry Waxman to the status of third-tier cable guest.

Combine this breakthrough to enduring majority status in the House with the retirement of Democratic Senate incumbents in Florida, Georgia, both Carolinas, and Louisiana, the Thune challenge to Daschle in South Dakota, and the embarrassing candidacies of Murray and Boxer on the West Coast, and it would be amazing if Terry McAuliffe slept a wink last night. He already owns the title of worst national party chairman in history, and he's obliged to stay on through the fall.

It is funny listening to Wesley Clark talk about his tax plans. He wants to raise the top bracket to 45 percent, an idea which would be DOA in the next Congress. The same goes for all the sweeping plans of Dean, Kerry, et al. When will the media ask these statesmen-in-the-cocoon how, as president, they would deal with Tom DeLay after attempting to demonize him all these months?

The only threat to the GOP this year is George Soros and the shadowy 527 Committees he, Hollywood, and a few others are funding. But not even Soros has enough money to buy back Texas or a Democratic Senate majority. Which guarantees that the only downside for the GOP from Tuesday's decision is desperation on the left when it comes to the presidential campaign.

Hugh Hewitt is the host of The Hugh Hewitt Show, a nationally syndicated radio talkshow, and a contributing writer to The Daily Standard. His new book, In, But Not Of, has just been published by Thomas Nelson.



© Copyright 2004, News Corporation, Weekly Standard, All Rights Reserved.