SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Secret Squirrels hit! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Trumptown who wrote (9656)1/8/2004 5:14:33 PM
From: Tom Swift  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12872
 
11 M$ accounting irregularity. Not an Enron situation.

IBM Reports Receipt of SEC 'Wells Notice' Regarding Dollar General
Thursday January 8, 4:55 pm ET

ARMONK, N.Y.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 8, 2004--IBM today announced that it has received a "Wells Notice" from the staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in connection with the SEC's investigation of a customer of IBM's Retail Stores Solutions unit, which sells point-of-sale products. IBM disclosed the existence of this investigation on June 2, 2003. The IBM customer that is the subject of this investigation is Dollar General Corporation. It is IBM's understanding that an IBM employee in its Sales and Distribution unit has also received a Wells Notice from the SEC in connection with this matter.
The Wells Notice notifies IBM that the SEC staff is considering recommending that the SEC bring a civil action against IBM for possible violations of the U.S. securities laws relating to Dollar General's accounting for a specific transaction, by participating in and aiding and abetting Dollar General's misstatement of its 2000 results. In that transaction, IBM paid Dollar General $11M for certain used equipment as part of a sale of IBM replacement equipment in Dollar General's 2000 fourth fiscal quarter.

Under the SEC's procedures, IBM has the opportunity to respond to the SEC staff before the staff makes a formal recommendation regarding whether any action should be brought against IBM by the SEC.

IBM continues to cooperate fully with the investigation relating to Dollar General and the separate SEC investigation relating to the recognition of revenue by IBM in 2000 and 2001 primarily concerning certain types of customer transactions, which is not the subject of this Wells Notice.