Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RealMuLan who wrote (34524)	1/8/2004 9:00:41 PM
From: lurqer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

As for Taiwan, I have said so many times already, it is China's domestic affair, and NO one, including the US, has the right to interfere. China will keep its word and its territory intact at any cost. It is not really relevant how many people in Taiwan want independence. Even if 100% of them want, comparing with 1.3 billion Mainlanders, 20 million are still absolute minority. No matter how many times you make an assertion, it's still an assertion. Repletion does not lend legitimacy. There are serious questions about any Chinese claim on Taiwan's territory. To maintain it's irrelevant what the wants of the indigenous people are, raises the specter of aggressive subjugation. Consider taiwandc.org Since the Taiwanese seemed to have entered the modern world under the Dutch; perhaps Amsterdam has a better claim than Beijing. Thanks for the link to Early Soviet Foreign Policy . I'm still "digesting" it. JMO lurqer