SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Wesley Clark -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (1032)1/9/2004 11:28:04 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 1414
 
Kerry is 'bringing it on'
______________

By Patrick Healy
Boston Globe Staff
1/9/2004

PERRY, Iowa -- From Elks clubs to cramped diners across Iowa, John F. Kerry seems a changed man these days. As he promises to go head to head with President Bush on a signature Republican issue, national security, Kerry has been underscoring his resolve by challenging Bush to "bring it on," and audiences have begun saying the words with him.

ADVERTISEMENT

This spontaneous response is one of several signs, members of his campaign staff say, that the senator is gaining momentum in Iowa at the right moment -- 10 days before this state's presidential nominating caucuses, a period when a healthy minority of undecided voters settle on a candidate.

Kerry's crowds have grown larger since Christmas, from a typical 125 or so in a good-sized city to more than 200 at most events today. More undecided voters are coming out to take a look at him, according to campaign staff. About 200 people filled a church hall in Ames on Tuesday morning, when it was so cold that some cars wouldn't start.

Kerry's performance has sharpened, too, his staff says: less windy in his answers to voters, and more relaxed, despite the high stakes in a state where Kerry is hoping to exceed expectations of a third-place finish.

Three times recently, he has started late-night snowball fights and football tosses with aides. He strums tunes on his guitar at his daughter's request.

And he delights in recent evidence that Howard Dean, with his established lead in the polls, is eyeing him warily. A new Dean mailing to Iowa voters attacked Kerry directly, noting an opinion poll last year that indicated Kerry trailing in his home state of Massachusetts to Dean.

"Footsteps," Kerry said recently, suggesting that Dean had been jarred into attack mode because of momentum by Kerry.

Kerry's campaign, meanwhile, accused Dean's camp yesterday of sending spies to inquire about Kerry strategy at campaign offices. Late last night, Dean's Iowa campaign manager, Jeani Murray, announced she had fired two workers who had recently joined the campaign but had "misrepresented themselves and the campaign."

Whether Kerry has begun to surge in Iowa, or whether Iowa's many undecided voters are shopping around more, is a popular parlor game for political observers anticipating the first-in-the-nation caucuses Jan. 19. What's certain is that new attention is falling on Kerry.

"Part of Kerry's recent success is Iowans looking for an alternative to Dean, because they worry, as the caucuses arrive, that he may be unelectable," said Fred Antczak, professor of rhetoric and a political observer at the University of Iowa. "Kerry seems to have the gravitas that would make him a good alternative."

Kerry is returning to the state tomorrow with one of his most popular political allies, Senator Edward M. Kennedy. Kerry is scheduled to announce "a major endorsement" from "a prominent state leader" in Davenport today, according to his campaign. His aides said it would not be the state's senior senator, Tom Harkin. Kerry has been courting Representative Leonard Boswell, a fellow veteran who has appeared with Kerry on the campaign trail since fall, and Attorney General Tom Miller, who spent part of Sunday evening with Kerry.

Dean's camp has been eager to project anxiety about Kerry. Dean's Iowa advisers reveal that in their own polls Kerry has climbed into a second-place tie with Gephardt, with Dean in the lead.

A new Iowa poll released yesterday indicated Dean ahead, with 29 percent of the vote; Gephardt in second, at 22 percent; and Kerry, 21 percent. The margin of error was 4 percentage points.

Gephardt's polls indicate him leading, with Dean in second place, a Gephardt campaign official said. Still, a senior Dean adviser contended, "Kerry has turned Iowa into a real dogfight."

Dean aides have a motive to pump up Kerry, political observers note. Together, they can knock out Gephardt in the Iowa caucuses and strengthen Kerry's fight against retired Army General Wesley K. Clark in New Hampshire. Kerry plans to spend most of the next 10 days in Iowa courting undecided voters as well as about 93,000 Democrats and independents who, like himself, are veterans.



To: American Spirit who wrote (1032)1/10/2004 8:25:09 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 1414
 
Clark appearance boosting turnout for Democratic fund-raiser

mercurynews.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (1032)1/11/2004 9:57:25 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1414
 
Clark says he's vindicated by O'Neill book

sfgate.com

Clark says he's vindicated by O'Neill book
KATE McCANN, Associated Press Writer
Sunday, January 11, 2004
©2004 Associated Press

(01-11) 17:09 PST MANCHESTER, N.H. (AP) --

Democratic presidential hopeful Wesley Clark says a book by former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill vindicates what he has said all along about the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

While rallying campaign volunteers Sunday at his Manchester headquarters, Clark praised O'Neill for "The Price of Loyalty," which contends the United States began the war on Iraq just days after President Bush took office -- more than two years before the start of the overthrow of Saddam Hussein.

O'Neill was fired by Bush in December 2002.

Clark first met O'Neill when Clark worked at the White House during the Ford administration, and calls him a man with "100 percent, rock-solid commonsense judgment."

"When he writes that the Bush administration is planning and exchanging documents on how to go to war with Iraq as soon as they took office, that just confirms my worst suspicions about this administration," Clark said.

In Clark's book, "Winning Modern War", which came out in November, the retired Army general traced the plotting of the war in Iraq back to 1996, when he says a group left over from the first Bush administration recommended that Israel focus on removing Saddam from power.

Clark goes on to write that in 1998, the group of 20, which included Donald H. Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz, now Defense Secretary and Deputy Defense Secretary, respectively, wrote a letter to President Clinton, asking him to "aim, above all, at the removal of Saddam Hussein's regime from power."

"We went to a war in Iraq we didn't have to go to," Clark told a group of supporters. "I'm calling on the Congress of the United States to fully investigate exactly why this country went to a war it didn't have to fight."

Clark said he was in the Pentagon immediately after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, and heard officials joking that, "'if Saddam didn't do it, he should have, because if he didn't, we're going to get him anyway."'

©2004 Associated Press



To: American Spirit who wrote (1032)1/13/2004 8:46:43 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 1414
 
Clark beats Dean in Arizona poll

dailystar.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (1032)1/14/2004 10:44:04 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1414
 
from "Dude, Where's My Country?", p.210-213, By Michael Moore, written before September '03...

"Many months ago, in the days leading up to the Iraq
invasion, I was flipping through the channesls and I
came across a general talking on CNN. Assuming this
was just another one of those talking ex-miltary heads
who had sprung up all over our networks, I was ready
to keep flipping. But he said something that caught my
ear, and I continued to listen. He was actually
questioning the wisdom of Bush attacking Iraq. Long
before it came out the Bush & Co. were purposefully
deceiving the American people about "weapons of mass
destruction" in Iraq, he was questioning whether, in
fact, Iraq was a true threat to the United States.
Whoa. Who was this guy?
His name was Wesley Clark. Gen. Wesley Clark. First
in his class at West Point, a Rhodes Scholar at
Oxford, former Supreme Allied Commander of NATO, and a
Democrat from Arkansas...
...He is pro choice and a strong advocate for women's
rights...He is against the Bush tax cut...He is
against Patriot Act II and wants the first one
re-examined...He is for gun control...He is for
affirmative action...His pro-environment...He favors
working with our allies instead of pissing them off...
So, here's my question to the lame-o Democrats: Why
the hell aren't you running this guy? Is it because he
might WIN? Yeah, how bizarre would that be - a winner!
Don't want to try that do you?
Well, if I were looking for a strategy to beat Bush
the deserter, I'd run a friggin' four-star general
against him! ...Clark has been awarded the Silver Star,
Bronze Star, the Purple Heart, and the Presidential
Medal of Freedom. Thanks to the British and the Dutch,
he's also got a couple of honorary knighthoods!
..If it takes a pro-choice, pro-environment general
who believes in universal health care and who thinks
war is never the first answer to a conflict, if that
is what it takes to remove these bastards and do the
job the Democrats should have done in 2000 -- then
that is what I am prepared to do."