To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (15832 ) 1/11/2004 1:01:51 PM From: kormac Respond to of 306849 Since the so called "free trade" is not the classical type, based on comparative advantage , in which only finished products were traded, its theoretical foundations need to be questioned. Today many factors of production cross national boundaries. Thus capital moves to countries where there is surplus labor of various skill level, low skilled work to China and services to India and even engineering to Russia. Chemical companies open factories where natural gas is accessible. This will change only after the absolute advantage disappears. This means dropping of the dollar until the pay for workers in these countries rise and US wages drop sufficiently to level on of the factors of production. Natural resources, and in particular energy supply, is a factor which favors Russia and the Persian Gulf. But then other factors in those countries are lacking, such as strong democratic institutions. Some of this stuff was recently discussed in a Brookings Institution Forum on Free Trade and an NYTimes Op Ed piece.c-span.org ; When listening to the clip note how Mr. Donahue is good story teller, but his analytical abilities are quite weak. Schumer, as a politician tries not to offend anyone by his rhetoric. The card-carrying economist, I believe and MIT-trained woman keeps looking at the data and does not see the forest from the trees. What I have written above comes from Roberts, from a conservative think-tank. He mentioned that president of Georgia Tech is convening a forum on engineering education, presumably to discuss what is its future. Many universities have now branch campuses in various parts of the world. The underlying thought is for a world government and dismantling of national boundaries. This is an utopian program which will end in grief.