SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (123008)1/11/2004 3:53:40 AM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Doesn't change the fact that US policy has favored Saddam's removal for years.

But that wasn't the point of O'Neill's comments. At the time that Bush took office the Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998 expressly prohibited the use of US Armed Forces; and the intent to invade Iraq occurred long before 9/11. Which contradicts Bush's statements after 9/11.

They are all facts.

jttmab



To: Brumar89 who wrote (123008)1/11/2004 3:53:40 AM
From: jttmab  Respond to of 281500
 
Edit: Deleted double post.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News